44% of March 15 GOP Voters Won't Vote For Trump! (Probably White People(?)!)

[mascale]

Someone on CNN noted that Trump is not liked in no-uncertain terms by Republicans. It is elsewhere noted that the Chicago, relatively high Democratic Party turnout, had nothing to do with Sanders or Clinton, but with a local issue over police behavior remedies. And so the national election may turn into a referendum with basis in the "Anti" Enthusiasm Gap(?)! That may have basis in the fact that there is no such thing, enthusiastically stated(?)! Mainly, Trump and Clinton both appear to be apparently, "Low Energy!" Trump mainly wins the "anti" appellation, way more than does Secretary Clinton.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html?_r=0

The New York Times mainly notes that neither leading candidate is widespread adored. Trump is way more distrusted than is Secretary Clinton. Trump is far less well-regarded than is Secretary Clinton. Toward the bottom of the link, Liberal former Republican Senator, Lowell Weicker, is on record: Definitely voting for Clinton over Trump.

In a primary election, in fact this year, there has been a great deal of inclusive, multi-racial turnout. What advantages the Democrats may have actually turn on how disgracefully U. S. Nationals are treated at the hands of police--in local jurisdictions nationwide. For others it may turn on how disgracefully U. S. nationals are likely to be treated, rounded up as illegal immigrants. Real illegal immigrants have been leaving for years, but still the press corps seems to report that maybe there are millions, still around.

Unlike the era of the Nixon "Silent Majority," there is now a post-Obama era of the "Angry Minorities," White, Hispanic, Black, Moslem, Liberal, and others too numerous for Donald Trump to mention--the way he does.

One headline from Trump can even be construed as disparaging Catholics and Conservatives alike: "Americans Need Protection!" says the Donald. Even little kids of both sexes have likely known that for years! Trump, however, may mean giant fences. . .instead of "Protection," widely needed(?)! Even little kids probably know about that, by now, too!

Serious low energy is now becoming Trump, trying to create a coalition(?)! That somehow gets translated to getting Mexico to pay for U.S. "Protection(?)!"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Making America Imperialist Again: Starts with Demanding Tribute Money for pretty fences(?)!)

 

[GHook93]

Someone on CNN noted that Trump is not liked in no-uncertain terms by Republicans. It is elsewhere noted that the Chicago, relatively high Democratic Party turnout, had nothing to do with Sanders or Clinton, but with a local issue over police behavior remedies. And so the national election may turn into a referendum with basis in the "Anti" Enthusiasm Gap(?)! That may have basis in the fact that there is no such thing, enthusiastically stated(?)! Mainly, Trump and Clinton both appear to be apparently, "Low Energy!" Trump mainly wins the "anti" appellation, way more than does Secretary Clinton.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html?_r=0

The New York Times mainly notes that neither leading candidate is widespread adored. Trump is way more distrusted than is Secretary Clinton. Trump is far less well-regarded than is Secretary Clinton. Toward the bottom of the link, Liberal former Republican Senator, Lowell Weicker, is on record: Definitely voting for Clinton over Trump.

In a primary election, in fact this year, there has been a great deal of inclusive, multi-racial turnout. What advantages the Democrats may have actually turn on how disgracefully U. S. Nationals are treated at the hands of police--in local jurisdictions nationwide. For others it may turn on how disgracefully U. S. nationals are likely to be treated, rounded up as illegal immigrants. Real illegal immigrants have been leaving for years, but still the press corps seems to report that maybe there are millions, still around.

Unlike the era of the Nixon "Silent Majority," there is now a post-Obama era of the "Angry Minorities," White, Hispanic, Black, Moslem, Liberal, and others too numerous for Donald Trump to mention--the way he does.

One headline from Trump can even be construed as disparaging Catholics and Conservatives alike: "Americans Need Protection!" says the Donald. Even little kids of both sexes have likely known that for years! Trump, however, may mean giant fences. . .instead of "Protection," widely needed(?)! Even little kids probably know about that, by now, too!

Serious low energy is now becoming Trump, trying to create a coalition(?)! That somehow gets translated to getting Mexico to pay for U.S. "Protection(?)!"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Making America Imperialist Again: Starts with Demanding Tribute Money for pretty fences(?)!)

In your wet dreams brah!

44% say that now, they won't say that when they are looking at a Clinton Presidency.

 

[mascale]

Tongue-In-Cheek, what with a lifetime of Sanders reading from out-dated texts(?): Even Wall Street is comfortable with the prospect of a Clinton presidency. The plan to enrich the public college faculty--more or less exclusively chosen(?)--out of all the rest is economic myopia. It is in its third or fourth Millennium of created atrocity. The guise is "free tuition," as in "More pay for the already prosperous, public college teachers. The problem is in Deuteronomy 23:19-20, wherein Israel is told to screw all the foreigners with usury, just (more or less), like that. That is exposed in Matthew 25:14-30. The rich income servant gets the more Talents. The low income servant gets thrown out of the household, into whatever was foreclosure. Not so stated, the famous Jewish House of Lehman Brothers, comes Tumbling on Down.

The remedy is in Matthew 20:1-16, a basis for the "Make Work Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit." A basis for that Credit is likely in the Clinton Equal Amount Per Child Income Tax Credit, still on the books. A basis for that credit is likely the raised and indexed Standard Deduction and Personal Exemptions in the 1986 Income Tax Reform. The Times were Ivy League. Mostly people were mainly thrown off the income tax rolls, completely and in the altogether. The basis lawsuits were actually protests in Tax Court, away from Ivy League radar, completely.

The Refundable Credit was more like a pay raise. It was not for just the Chosen People(s), but for the economic community--multi-racial, Multi-Religious, and Multi-Cultural. There exists a world with no deities at all, even right here in the United States!

The exit poll findings are likely of moderate Republicans, more or less turning away like former Senator Weicker, or probably a lot of Mormons(?) The Republicans seem to want to avoid Utah, in the coming debate, now cancelled. Trump supporters are not into dissent and protesters from organized religion, like in the history of religion based in Utah. Some religions are different from the others(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Evangelical Mormons(?)! Hmmmmm! People know about Evangelical Moslems, already, on the other hand! Jihad!)

 

[waltky]

Granny says dat's okay...

... dat leaves 56% dat will.

 

[mascale]

Even, or especially, at GOP: Granny would likely be said Jewish. Janet Yellen is Jewish. Senator Sanders is Jewish. 56% of the minority party would be said up against half its own party, but all the voters in all the other parties.

Usury, in Medieval History, was not allowed among Christians, and so it was left up to the Jews, thought foreign, who gouged and gouged along for centuries. Many find the basis anti-Semitism created to be the basis of German Holocaust, of the Third Republic. Even the rabbis seemed, "All Aboard!" with that--and so the death trains all departed. So in the United States--most prominently, most recently, Economist Milton Friedman was for fixed percentage usury-like pay boosts. He had mentored Alan Greenspan, favorite of fixed percentage usurers. Yellen is currently Head Usurer in Charge.

Trump likes mainly to go the bankruptcy route, as though that were better. He does note that in America, that is also lawful. Clearly Senator Sanders is a law and order kind of guy, with greedy, self-serving followers--about as smart as the Jews. . . .or even the Koreans.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Make better sense. . .Stand young warrior in front of tree. . . .shoot fruity things from hair. . .three sheets to the wind!)