Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed.NO, they don't.
PRA is a law.
NARA governs them but when a subpoena is issued, the DOJ takes over, to return them to the rightful owner.
Seeing how the orange retard didn't comply with NARA, the DOJ filed charges.
www.wsj.com
Whataboutism doesn’t work in court.Agreed.
Trump fucked-up. However, he still has quite a good hand to play.
I hope the stupid fuck gets burned, but it will be an interesting court fight.
Opinion | Trump’s Boxes and Clinton’s Sock Drawer
A president chooses what records to return or keep and the National Archives can’t do anything about it.
FOS opinion.Agreed.
Trump fucked-up. However, he still has quite a good hand to play.
I hope the stupid fuck gets burned, but it will be an interesting court fight.
Opinion | Trump’s Boxes and Clinton’s Sock Drawer
A president chooses what records to return or keep and the National Archives can’t do anything about it.
Its not whataboutism, its about legal precedent.Whataboutism doesn’t work in court.
How...ironic. JD Vance responds to Trump being held accountable by staging a political motivated protest.
How DO these tards stand the stench of their own hypocrisy?
Nearly half the country supports Trump federal indictment, but believes politics were involved
I would guess nearly 90 percent of the country has not read the indictment.
If they did, the percentage of supporters of the indictment would skyrocket.
Got a cite for the “Sock Drawer” suit?Its not whataboutism, its about legal precedent.
OK, I agree with that.FOS opinion. The NARA decides which "documents" the president gets to keep.
Specifically, the PRA:
- Establishes public ownership of all Presidential records and defines the term Presidential records.
- Requires that Vice-Presidential records be treated in the same way as Presidential records.
- Places the responsibility for the custody and management of incumbent Presidential records with the President.
- Requires that the President and his staff take all practical steps to file personal records separately from Presidential records.
- Allows the incumbent President to dispose of records that no longer have administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value, once the views of the Archivist of the United States on the proposed disposal have been obtained in writing.
Got a cite for the “Sock Drawer” suit?
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/XOL7EBHPOJKBXMEQDQITGVZZ5U.jpg)
www.reuters.com
They did.OK, I agree with that.
So why didn't NARA do its job?
Sure ............WHERE did the captions come from?See thread "This tells you everything you need to know about the "classified document hoax"
I highly recommend you actually read the case they’re referring to because this political hack of a lawyer is leaving a lot of details out and lying about other details.But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them.Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and âClinton's sock drawerâ defense
If you believe the most ardent defenders of newly indicted former president Donald Trump, there’s a silver bullet hiding in Bill Clinton’s sock drawer.
“The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
That language, as I’ll explain, has emboldened Trump supporters who contend that under Jackson's analysis, the Justice Department had no authority to seize documents from Mar-a-Lago.
That only applies to documents he generated, not those generated by others and classified.But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them.Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and âClinton's sock drawerâ defense
If you believe the most ardent defenders of newly indicted former president Donald Trump, there’s a silver bullet hiding in Bill Clinton’s sock drawer.
“The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
That language, as I’ll explain, has emboldened Trump supporters who contend that under Jackson's analysis, the Justice Department had no authority to seize documents from Mar-a-Lago.
If Trump dies in prison its his own damn fault.They did.
Sure ............WHERE did the captions come from?
Inserted by who?
A RWNJ teabagger?
Same picture, no captions.
FAIL.
You may be right. Barr said Trump is toast. But there are a few legal points to consider, like precedent.That only applies to documents he generated, not those generated by others and classified.
www.wsj.com
Good research. This will be an interesting legal case to follow. I'm betting that it will be delayed and delayed and delayed until after the 2024 election.I highly recommend you actually read the case they’re referring to because this political hack of a lawyer is leaving a lot of details out and lying about other details.
Judicial Watch lost the case because the court couldn’t force the archivist to do what they wanted.
The case notes that there is an enforcement mechanism in the law, and that mechanism is solely at the discretion of the archivist.
From the decision:
View attachment 795055
Yes, delaying the trial is a sign of weakness. As are the lies about case law coming from Trump supporters. As is the ridiculous assertions that defy logic and common sense regarding the idea that military documents are in fact “personal”.Good research. This will be an interesting legal case to follow. I'm betting that it will be delayed and delayed and delayed until after the 2024 election.
If the other living presidents aren't charged, then Trump shouldn't. They all did the same thing.So, mishandling classified documents is OK with you?!?!
If Trump dies in prison its his own damn fault. That said, the "law" isn't always cut-and-dried. Look at Hillary as an example. Look at her lack of "intent", etc.Yes, delaying the trial is a sign of weakness. As are the lies about case law coming from Trump supporters. As is the ridiculous assertions that defy logic and common sense regarding the idea that military documents are in fact “personal”. Trump has a serious uphill battle and his best hope is to delay and prey for a pardon or electoral victory. He doesn’t have the law on his side. He has to go around the law.
They made up Russian collusion to take Trump out, you think they won't fabricate some else to take him out? You loons are full of hate.NO, they don't.
PRA is a law.
NARA governs them but when a subpoena is issued, the DOJ takes over, to return them to the rightful owner.
Seeing how the orange retard didn't comply with NARA, the DOJ filed charges.
