5 wealthiest Muslim nations refuse Syrian refugees -- fear terrorism

[Theowl32]

Five Wealthiest Muslim Nations REFUSE Syrian Refugees – Fear Terrorism

Jim Hoft Sep 7th, 2015 9:56 pm 39 Comments

On Monday Turkish Prime Minister Ahmed Davutoglu criticized the “ridiculously small” share of foreign refugees Europe was accepting, calling the continent the “Christian fortress of Europe.”

350,000 migrants have fled to Europe this year.
Almost 50,000 asylum-seekers reached Greece in July alone.

But the wealthiest Muslim nations – Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Oman and Kuwait have accepted NO SYRIAN REFUGEES!

Five Wealthiest Muslim Nations REFUSE Syrian Refugees - Fear Terrorism - The Gateway Pundit

Yeah, those muslims sure are good to one another. Then again the left will never blame them for a thing. I mean you ever hear the left blaming Egypt in how they dealt and mistreated the Palestinians when they owned the land? No, I do not remember that at all. Wait, back then the world did not even acknowledge Palestinians.

They especially never did acknowledge the Palestinians when Jordan killed 10s of thousands of them.

Oh......but now, they all of a sudden just love them oh soooo much.

Anyway, this situation is pretty much just like that one. Boy that Arab Spring thing has really worked out. Hasn't it?

 

[Sunni Man]

Why should the 5 Gulf States accept the refuges?

Europe and the US created the problem with their invasions and bombings.

Let them handle it. ......

 

[Claudette]

They don't want to be overrun by refugee's even if they are all Muslim. Who wants to pay for refugee's??

You can bet they are happy the dumb Europeans are letting them in.

 

[DarkFury]

Why should the 5 Gulf States accept the refuges?

Europe and the US created the problem with their invasions and bombings.

Let them handle it. ......

The five gulf states do not want the burden the crime nor the ignorance.

 

[Rotagilla]

no problem..obama will figure out a way to bring more of them here to colonize...anything to further destabilize america...

 

[Theowl32]

Do muslims feed and clothe the poor like Christians do and have been doing around the world for 2000 years?

Doesn't it forbid muslims to treat infidels with mercy?

Is there anything about liberals that is not despicable?

 

[pwjohn]

Why should the 5 Gulf States accept the refuges?

Europe and the US created the problem with their invasions and bombings.

Let them handle it. ......

Not true in Syria's case. That's all on third world Arab Muslim shithole people behaving badly.

 

[charwin95]

no problem..obama will figure out a way to bring more of them here to colonize...anything to further destabilize america...

Get ready then because they are looking very closely how US govt. can help. Estimates 30k.

 

[Rotagilla]

no problem..obama will figure out a way to bring more of them here to colonize...anything to further destabilize america...

Get ready then because they are looking very closely how US govt. can help.

I have no doubt. None at all. A re set seems imminent.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Five Wealthiest Muslim Nations REFUSE Syrian Refugees – Fear Terrorism

Jim Hoft Sep 7th, 2015 9:56 pm 39 Comments

On Monday Turkish Prime Minister Ahmed Davutoglu criticized the “ridiculously small” share of foreign refugees Europe was accepting, calling the continent the “Christian fortress of Europe.”

350,000 migrants have fled to Europe this year.
Almost 50,000 asylum-seekers reached Greece in July alone.

But the wealthiest Muslim nations – Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Oman and Kuwait have accepted NO SYRIAN REFUGEES!

Five Wealthiest Muslim Nations REFUSE Syrian Refugees - Fear Terrorism - The Gateway Pundit

Yeah, those muslims sure are good to one another. Then again the left will never blame them for a thing. I mean you ever hear the left blaming Egypt in how they dealt and mistreated the Palestinians when they owned the land? No, I do not remember that at all. Wait, back then the world did not even acknowledge Palestinians.

They especially never did acknowledge the Palestinians when Jordan killed 10s of thousands of them.

Oh......but now, they all of a sudden just love them oh soooo much.

Anyway, this situation is pretty much just like that one. Boy that Arab Spring thing has really worked out. Hasn't it?

typical....Arab nations do not allow Palestinians to enter their countries as well.

 

[charwin95]

Maduro of Venezuela agreed to take 25k of these refugees. Considering his country is already in trouble finding basic necessities for his own people.

 

[tyroneweaver]

The muslims don't need the refugees' cause they're all ending up here in Twin Falls, Idaho

 

[Claudette]

Of course they don't want refugee's. If they take them then they are responsible for them. Food, shelter and medical care.

Much better to let other idiots "help" them. Let someone else take responsibility for the care they will require.

Watch Europe bend over backwards taking them in and I sure hope we don't do the same.

We have enough Muslims in the US and they all aren't pursuing the American Dream.

 

[waltky]

Considering the consequences of refugee crisis...

Recent wave of migration could have disastrous consequences for Europe: FAO's India representative Shyam Khadka
Sep 8, 2015: UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has warned that the recent wave of migration could have disastrous consequences for Europe and cause acute food insecurity. In an exclusive interview to TOI's Kounteya Sinha, FAO's representative to India, Shyam Khadka says Europe can learn from India which has a rich experience in dealing with humanitarian crisis and also has experience of implementing the world's largest public distribution system for food

How serious is the migration crisis in Europe, especially for food security in the world?

The migration crisis we are seeing in Europe is very serious in humanitarian terms. Its impact on the overall food supply at the global level, however, would not be very pronounced at this stage. For the affected migrating families, however, food security is clearly an issue and in a large number of cases, the main reason behind their migration. Since war or war-like situation in places where from out-migration is taking place would affect food production and supply locally, we need to ensure improved security and assured means for livelihood in an urgent basis. Otherwise, this crisis will persist, may even escalate bringing disastrous consequences to Europe and potentially other parts of the world.

In what ways will Europe face the brunt over this migration?

As the number of migrants is still relatively low compared to the local population, Europe may not face a food crisis in short term. However, since the number of families uprooted in the countries of origin is much larger than those who have reached Europe so far, the potential problem is much larger than what we have seen so far. If all the uprooted families in the affected regions migrate, this crisis will become even more acute and this will have serious implications on food security as well as on other basic human needs such as shelter and healthcare in Europe.

Can lack of food instigate more tension in Europe?

Yes, if the current crisis escalates and leads to lack of food even at local level, it will create tension with the local population or even amongst local population. As the countries forced to receive migrants may continue to have differences, especially on burden sharing, it has the potentiality to affect relatively high level of economic integration achieved by Europe, and be disruptive. Under such scenario, food production and supply will also be negatively affected in Europe.

What are the ways in which Europe can mitigate this crisis?

Historically, especially after the World War II, global migration was driven by economic factors - a search for greener pastures. The current migration, however, is out of sheer desperation in which people would not mind risking their life in order to reach Europe. As it is a new phenomenon, we know very little about this and are sensing difficulty in finding a solution. In an ideal situation, the crisis needs to be tackled at the roots, by restoring peace and recreating livelihood opportunities in the war-ravaged or conflict-hit countries. Providing more resources to multi-lateral systems such as through the UN agencies can provide some cushion for a while. Agreeing on a common approach, especially on equitable burden-sharing amongst European countries is therefore the need of the hour.

How can India help Europe in such a crisis?

See also:

European Commission Proposes Quota Plan for Refugee Crisis
September 09, 2015 | European Commission Chief Jean-Claude Juncker has called on EU member states to resettle some 160,000 refugees, saying Greece, Italy, and Hungary can no longer handle the burden alone.

Speaking to the European Parliament Wednesday, Juncker urged Europe to face the current refugee crisis with solidarity. He said the granting of emergency relocation in 22 member states must be done "in a compulsory way" to avoid delay. "We Europeans should never forget why giving refuge and complying with fundamental right of asylum is so important," he said. He is urging EU interior ministers to endorse the resettlement plan next week at a meeting of EU interior ministers.

Syrian refugees rest at Greece's border with Macedonia, near the Greek village of Idomeni

Juncker also said he believes in allowing asylum-seekers to work while waiting for their asylum applications to be processed. He said he expects all member states to pitch in to an emergency trust fund to address future such refugee crises. The Commission's plan calls for an expanded country-by-country migrant quota plan throughout much of Europe, to accept thousands of asylum seekers from the Middle East over the next two years. Under the plan, Germany, France and Spain will take in the most, followed by Poland, the Netherlands, Romania, Belgium and Sweden.

Migrants wait for a bus to transport them to the metro station, after their arrival in Athens from the northeastern Greek island of Lesbos

Europe is facing its biggest stream of migrants since World War II, but the quota idea is controversial and adamantly opposed by Hungary and some other EU states. The adoption of quotas is uncertain, with European leaders already rejecting a proposal in June that covered just 40,000 refugees. The new distribution of asylum seekers would be based on a country's economic output, population, unemployment rate and the number of refugees each nation already had agreed to accept.

People make their way on the railway track at the border line between Serbia and Hungary near Roszke, southern Hungary

Chancellor Angela Merkel in Germany, where refugees have been welcomed with food, water and toys for children, has called Juncker's plan "a first important step." She said an EU requirement calling for asylum seekers to first be processed in the EU port in which they arrive "no longer works," because it means that Italy and Greece are handling the bulk of the influx escaping from the Middle East and Africa.

MORE