7 Injured As Settlers Attack Palestinian School Bus

[Billo_Really]

Oslo accords, that palistanians signed, don't contain provisions for whipping dumbass palistanian intifadas up. But palistanians don't give a damn about agreements they signed, of course.

The Israeli's were in breach of that aggreement, which basically ended its enforcement.

After palistanians breached the Accords there was no point for Israel to comply with them, of course.

Israel was the first to breach.

 

[docmauser1]

Now that's a bunch of drivel!

How so?

There's no such thing as a "Palestinian occupation".

It is common knowledge that palistanians occupy Judea and Samaria with their occupation, of course.

 

[Billo_Really]

How so?

There's no such thing as a "Palestinian occupation".

It is common knowledge that palistanians occupy Judea and Samaria with their occupation, of course.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Judea and Samaria in the West Bank?

 

[Lipush]

True.

There is Arab occupation

There's no arab occupation either.

There is an Israeli one. It's been going on for 45 years.

There is Arab occupation of course.

Israel is shrinking all the time.

 

[docmauser1]

I noticed you had to omit this...

How so?

...for your post to work. Nice try.

Ah. So, are we alluding now that Israel occupies the territory of another state and, thus, has a right of self-defence? Bth., what is that state?

The definition of an "occupation", is not dependant on occupying territory of another state.

Of course it is.

It is occupying land for which you have no sovereign title to.

In memorable words of Winnie Churchill "So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population." What "sovereign title" does a bunch of arab immigrants have?

 

[docmauser1]

The imaginary state of Palestine

I guess this settles the argument of who is trying to wipe out who?

Noone can "wipe out" the nonexistent, of course.

 

[P F Tinmore]

How so?Ah. So, are we alluding now that Israel occupies the territory of another state and, thus, has a right of self-defence? Bth., what is that state?

The definition of an "occupation", is not dependant on occupying territory of another state.

Of course it is.

It is occupying land for which you have no sovereign title to.

In memorable words of Winnie Churchill "So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population." What "sovereign title" does a bunch of arab immigrants have?

Didn't the voters give that lying drunk the boot after the war?

 

[docmauser1]

The Oslo agreement is null and void.

Good.

Israel failed to live up to their part of the agreement.

Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

Israel broke the agreement first.

There was no point in keeping with the agreement, when palistanians didn't live up to it, of course.

 

[docmauser1]

The Oslo agreement is null and void.

Good.

Israel failed to live up to their part of the agreement.

Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

What did the Palestinians renege on?

Everything, naturally, but that was a little later, the beginning was typically palistanian - a terrorist gangster attack barely 10 days into the Oslo Accords killed Yigal Vaknin. Eran Bahar and Dror Porer were murdered two weeks later. Terrorist attacks went on and more people had been murdered. 15 acts of terror by the of 1993. Doooh.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Good.Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

What did the Palestinians renege on?

Everything, naturally, but that was a little later, the beginning was typically palistanian - a terrorist gangster attack barely 10 days into the Oslo Accords killed Yigal Vaknin. Eran Bahar and Dror Porer were murdered two weeks later. Terrorist attacks went on and more people had been murdered. 15 acts of terror by the of 1993. Doooh.

Israel doesn't have any civilians to attack.

 

[Billo_Really]

Noone can "wipe out" the nonexistent, of course.

Much like your arguments!

 

[toastman]

What did the Palestinians renege on?

Everything, naturally, but that was a little later, the beginning was typically palistanian - a terrorist gangster attack barely 10 days into the Oslo Accords killed Yigal Vaknin. Eran Bahar and Dror Porer were murdered two weeks later. Terrorist attacks went on and more people had been murdered. 15 acts of terror by the of 1993. Doooh.

Israel doesn't have any civilians to attack.

Looks like dementia is creeping up on you old man

 

[P F Tinmore]

Everything, naturally, but that was a little later, the beginning was typically palistanian - a terrorist gangster attack barely 10 days into the Oslo Accords killed Yigal Vaknin. Eran Bahar and Dror Porer were murdered two weeks later. Terrorist attacks went on and more people had been murdered. 15 acts of terror by the of 1993. Doooh.

Israel doesn't have any civilians to attack.

Looks like dementia is creeping up on you old man

What I said is true. Look it up.

 

[docmauser1]

Palestinian Mentality : Israel started everything first !

The mentality of that statement is that of a 15 year old.

Palistanians seem to get old without, actually, growing up. Isn't that funny?

 

[docmauser1]

Complying with international law has nothing to do with surrendering.

And what may that "international law" be? Have palistanians complied with it?

The rocket attacks are war crimes. Other than that, no.

Palistanian criminals.

 

[toastman]

Israel doesn't have any civilians to attack.

Looks like dementia is creeping up on you old man

What I said is true. Look it up.

 

[docmauser1]

There are over 200 UN resolutions on Israeli violations of international law.

Who cares what the UN General Kangaroo Assembly ruled by arabs/muslims pushes.

Member states do, which Israel is one.

Yeah.

 

[docmauser1]

Yeah, I saw them shoot a tear gas canister directly at a BBC reporter in the OPT.

Well, it's his occupation and the baggage of hazards that comes with it, of course.

It's illegal to target members of the media.

See, being a journo is a risky occupation. Running around with a shoulder camcorder attracts attention of snipers, for example, who may consider it an aiming device. Dooh.

 

[Hossfly]

Israel doesn't have any civilians to attack.

Looks like dementia is creeping up on you old man

What I said is true. Look it up.

Tinnie, do I have your permission to use some of your gems of wisdom in my quotes? To make it legal, just make a statement to the effect and I will print it out for my copyright. Thanks in advance.

 

[docmauser1]

"conquer by conquest" has been outlawed since the end of WWII.

Did the USA, the GB and Rusia comply?

Since we have not annexed any territory, almost yes. If we get the fuck out of Afghanistan......well, actually, the USA, no; GB and Russia, yes.

So, we may put the "conquer" contention to rest in peace, of course.