7 Injured As Settlers Attack Palestinian School Bus

[toastman]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2hZ6SlSqq0

Your video cites UN resolution 242 as one of the reasons. However, they cherry-picked one line out of the entire resolution as their justification for holding onto the West Bank. That is out of context with 242.

The purpose of that resolution was to tell Israel to get the fuck out of the West Bank. They have no sovereign title to that land. After 45 years, you would think you'd catch the clue no one is buying your rap.

Nice deflection. Israel will never make itself indefensible !

 

[Hossfly]

The Palestinians refused the offer to surrender?

WOW, such a deal. Why doesn't Israel surrender?

Because if the Palestinians don't surrender, they can kiss their future country good bye, while living in a state of constant war

The Palestinians are not the surrender type.

Maybe they like people to read their epitaph, "They Died With Their Boots On".
Must give them pride during the afterlife.

 

[docmauser1]

Israel is in no way limiting the palistanian occupation with which palistanians occupy and oppress the international community, of course. Let us not mislead the general reading public with bogus excuses.

Now that's a bunch of drivel!

How so?

 

[Billo_Really]

Right....Because before 67 we had peace, right?

I'm talking about the hostility that is a result of the occupation.

Before '67, hostility involved other nations, not just with the Palestinian's.

But since you wanna go there, you've been treating the Pals like garbage since the zionist migration in the early 1900's.

 

[Billo_Really]

Israel is in no way limiting the palistanian occupation with which palistanians occupy and oppress the international community, of course. Let us not mislead the general reading public with bogus excuses.

Now that's a bunch of drivel!

How so?

There's no such thing as a "Palestinian occupation".

 

[toastman]

Right....Because before 67 we had peace, right?

I'm talking about the hostility that is a result of the occupation.

Before '67, hostility involved other nations, not just with the Palestinian's.

But since you wanna go there, you've been treating the Pals like garbage since the zionist migration in the early 1900's.

In the words of docmauser: DRIVEL !

 

[toastman]

loinboy, you never answered my question as to why Israel would make itself indefensible

 

[Billo_Really]

Nice deflection. Israel will never make itself indefensible !

No one is asking them to.

They just can't move their borders onto land they don't own.

 

[toastman]

Nice deflection. Israel will never make itself indefensible !

No one is asking them to.

They just can't move their borders onto land they don't own.

You clearly didn't watch the video

 

[Billo_Really]

loinboy, you never answered my question as to why Israel would make yourself indefensible

Make me indefensible?

I don't see what your point is.

 

[Billo_Really]

You clearly didn't watch the video

If I didn't, then how did I know they cherry-picked 242?

 

[Billo_Really]

In the words of docmauser: DRIVEL !

That's not drivel, that's a historical fact.

 

[Lipush]

Now that's a bunch of drivel!

How so?

There's no such thing as a "Palestinian occupation".

True.

There is Arab occupation

 

[toastman]

You clearly didn't watch the video

If I didn't, then how did I know they cherry-picked 242?

Because you are saying that withdrawing from the West Bank is not asking Israel to make itself indefensible . Maybe you did watch the video, but you probably ignored the facts that contradict your beliefs

 

[Billo_Really]

Because you are saying that withdrawing from the West Bank is not asking Israel to make itself indefensible . Maybe you did watch the video, but you probably ignored the facts that contradict your beliefs

This "indefensible border" crap is bullshit. It's just another excuse not to comply with international law.

Israel is the only nuclear power in the ME. That's pretty defensible to me.

They beat the shit out of Egypt in 6 days without these borders.

 

[Billo_Really]

True.

There is Arab occupation

There's no arab occupation either.

There is an Israeli one. It's been going on for 45 years.

 

[toastman]

Because you are saying that withdrawing from the West Bank is not asking Israel to make itself indefensible . Maybe you did watch the video, but you probably ignored the facts that contradict your beliefs

This "indefensible border" crap is bullshit. It's just another excuse not to comply with international law.

Israel is the only nuclear power in the ME. That's pretty defensible to me.

They beat the shit out of Egypt in 6 days without these borders.

I expected a comment like that from you !

 

[Billo_Really]

I expected a comment like that from you !

What do you want? A cookie?

 

[docmauser1]

Hopefully, forever, because the whole ICJ idiocy is that palistanians can't claim occupation, because they've never been a state. hehehehe

I noticed you had to omit this...

How so?

Quote: Originally Posted by docmauser1 [*]The ICJ ruled that the West Bank is an occupied territory.

...for your post to work. Nice try.

Ah. So, are we alluding now that Israel occupies the territory of another state and, thus, has a right of self-defence? Bth., what is that state?

 

[toastman]

Hopefully, forever, because the whole ICJ idiocy is that palistanians can't claim occupation, because they've never been a state. hehehehe

I noticed you had to omit this...

How so?

Quote: Originally Posted by docmauser1 [*]The ICJ ruled that the West Bank is an occupied territory.

...for your post to work. Nice try.

Ah. So, are we alluding now that Israel occupies the territory of another state and, thus, has a right of self-defence? Bth., what is that state?

The imaginary state of Palestine