7 Injured As Settlers Attack Palestinian School Bus

[Billo_Really]

Hopefully, forever, because the whole ICJ idiocy is that palistanians can't claim occupation, because they've never been a state. hehehehe

I noticed you had to omit this...

How so?

Quote: Originally Posted by docmauser1 [*]The ICJ ruled that the West Bank is an occupied territory.

...for your post to work. Nice try.

Ah. So, are we alluding now that Israel occupies the territory of another state and, thus, has a right of self-defence? Bth., what is that state?

The definition of an "occupation", is not dependant on occupying territory of another state.

It is occupying land for which you have no sovereign title to.

 

[Billo_Really]

The imaginary state of Palestine

I guess this settles the argument of who is trying to wipe out who?

 

[docmauser1]

The Oslo agreement is null and void.

Good.

Israel failed to live up to their part of the agreement.

Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

 

[Billo_Really]

The Oslo agreement is null and void.

Good.

Israel failed to live up to their part of the agreement.

Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

Israel broke the agreement first.

 

[toastman]

The Oslo agreement is null and void.

Good.

Israel failed to live up to their part of the agreement.

Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

Israel broke the agreement first.

Palestinian Mentality : Israel started everything first !

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Oslo agreement is null and void.

Good.

Israel failed to live up to their part of the agreement.

Why should Israel stick to an agreement, if palistanians do not?

What did the Palestinians renege on?

 

[docmauser1]

An unarmed person is just that; someone who is not armed.

But palistanians are a special case, sometimes they commit suicide by the IDF to attain martyrdom and, hopefully, virgins.

 

[Billo_Really]

An unarmed person is just that; someone who is not armed.

But palistanians are a special case, sometimes they commit suicide by the IDF to attain martyrdom and, hopefully, virgins.

That's not the reason for the suicides.

 

[docmauser1]

Complying with international law has nothing to do with surrendering.

And what may that "international law" be? Have palistanians complied with it?

 

[Billo_Really]

Palestinian Mentality : Israel started everything first !

The mentality of that statement is that of a 15 year old.

 

[Billo_Really]

Complying with international law has nothing to do with surrendering.

And what may that "international law" be? Have palistanians complied with it?

The rocket attacks are war crimes.

Other than that, no.

 

[docmauser1]

How can hostilities end, if the occupation is what's causing the hostilities?

Oh, that's simple, palistanians are welcome to pick another occupation, of course.

 

[docmauser1]

There are over 200 UN resolutions on Israeli violations of international law.

Who cares what the UN General Kangaroo Assembly ruled by arabs/muslims pushes.

 

[Billo_Really]

There are over 200 UN resolutions on Israeli violations of international law.

Who cares what the UN General Kangaroo Assembly ruled by arabs/muslims pushes.

Member states do, which Israel is one.

 

[Billo_Really]

How can hostilities end, if the occupation is what's causing the hostilities?

Oh, that's simple, palistanians are welcome to pick another occupation, of course.

Fuck off, asshole!

 

[docmauser1]

Yeah, I saw them shoot a tear gas canister directly at a BBC reporter in the OPT.

Well, it's his occupation and the baggage of hazards that comes with it, of course.

 

[Billo_Really]

Yeah, I saw them shoot a tear gas canister directly at a BBC reporter in the OPT.

Well, it's his occupation and the baggage of hazards that comes with it, of course.

It's illegal to target members of the media.

 

[docmauser1]

"conquer by conquest" has been outlawed since the end of WWII.

Did the USA, the GB and Rusia comply?

 

[docmauser1]

Oslo accords, that palistanians signed, don't contain provisions for whipping dumbass palistanian intifadas up. But palistanians don't give a damn about agreements they signed, of course.

The Israeli's were in breach of that aggreement, which basically ended its enforcement.

After palistanians breached the Accords there was no point for Israel to comply with them, of course.

 

[Billo_Really]

"conquer by conquest" has been outlawed since the end of WWII.

Did the USA, the GB and Rusia comply?

Since we have not annexed any territory, almost yes.

If we get the fuck out of Afghanistan...

...well, actually, the USA, no; GB and Russia, yes.