Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nope. The prosecutor isn't saying what Brock knew or didn't know.where did you pull that statement from? your ass?
am I going to believe you or the prosecutor.
delivering/picking up packages is an established service that Uber provides
I’ve never heard of that either. Only thing I know of is Uber eats where the driver delivers food to you. Instacart is a company that delivers groceries and other supplies to folks from grocery stores and hardware stores, for exampleAre we supposed to know that for the NEXT Kidnapping - Ransom pickup? I've never heard of Uber package delivery- pickup. I've heard of FEDEX coming to your door or UPS un-announced.
You can't figure this out for yourself?The kidnappers still are not being paid and you keep saying that is endangering them. So shooting, detaining however you want to phrase it is by your own standards gambling with your loved ones life.
Nope. The prosecutor isn't saying what Brock knew or didn't know.
What else can he call the guy.
He wasn't actually a kidnapper.
So you can't even call him an alleged kidnapper.
He was a scammer...so that is how the prosecutor identified him.
That statement has zero bearing on what Brock knew at the time.
Surely you understand that and are just playing stupid.
That wont take longThe Uber driver did not demand shit.
The Uber driver did not even know about the scam.
This old fuck deserves to be in jail till the day he dies.
You’ve seen one too many Hollywood movies. You’re trying to play both sides claiming of you don’t pay you are endangering them but also claim by not paying you are helping them.You can't figure this out for yourself?
Your loved one is endangered if they have been kidnapped.
You pay them the money... you have nothing but hope that a criminal will honor your agreement.
You DON'T pay them the money, you have a criminal who you must hope WON'T honor his promise to kill your loved one.
If you have the accomplice, dead or alive, you have their Identity...their phone...their car...possibly with gps.
These things lead you to their home... their computer, their email, etc, etc...
And you've bought yourself time.
So that makes it okay to murder an innocent woman who was just doing her job responding to an Uber alert that popped up in her phone?Are we supposed to know that for the NEXT Kidnapping - Ransom pickup? I've never heard of Uber package delivery- pickup. I've heard of FEDEX coming to your door or UPS un-announced.
Yes…. You’ve never had autocorrect switch a word on you cause you typed something wrong?And yet "random" and "commuting" are words.
And yet, you seem to have zero sympathy for the poor woman who simply did her job responding to an Uber pingHow is any of that his fault?
He believed what he was told.
He's 81 years old ... not knowing about the existence of Uber rideshare service is not hard to believe and that he wouldn't be aware if their package service is even less difficult to believe
The self-identified kidnapper clearly stated that without the ransom his loved one would be murdered.
That's a pretty strong motivator to make sure his accomplice could neither leave nor contact the kidnapper...by any means necessary.
Sleepy don disagrees.and biden has got ground round for a brain.
Then Biden has something Trump doesn’t have at all.,and biden has got ground round for a brain.
Of course the uber driver was involved, to what extent, we do not know outside of an investigation. Involved, took part, phrase it any way you want. Criminals are incredible savvy. To flat out state that a man shot an uber driver is incorrect. She was participating in a crime, only a thorough investigation can conclude if she was not involved.Now wait a minute I haven’t read this. This would be groundbreaking. Are you saying that the Uber driver in the case of the original post… took part in a plot to try and rob the 81-year-old man?
Having a old man talking crazy to you holding a gun would make any reasonable person uneasy and want to fleeOf course the uber driver was involved, to what extent, we do not know outside of an investigation. Involved, took part, phrase it any way you want. Criminals are incredible savvy. To flat out state that a man shot an uber driver is incorrect. She was participating in a crime, only a thorough investigation can conclude if she was not involved.
Certainly, at the time she was shot, right or wrong, she was a suspect.
I still dont see a reason why the uber driver would try and flee when told that she was participating in a crime.
Yes, but a reasonable person would comply, instead of fleeing, resulting in their death. A shame we only get to see a few seconds and not the entire incident.Having a old man talking crazy to you holding a gun would make any reasonable person uneasy and want to flee
No a reasonable person would get the hell out of there. A idiot would stay.Yes, but a reasonable person would comply, instead of fleeing, resulting in their death. A shame we only get to see a few seconds and not the entire incident.
Why do you automatically think he had mental problems?
81-year-old Ohio man charged for the murder of Black Uber driver
William Brock shot unarmed 61-year-old Loletha Hall outside his home after confiscating her phone and blocking her from leaving.www.revolt.tv
he must have had some mental issue. at 81 if they can proove that he will go t o the nut house. terribly sad my gosh.
The SCAMMER dumbass.He has been charged with kidnapping and felonious assault.
Seems you have zero actual knowledge of the case.
i didnt.Why do you automatically think he had mental problems?
