9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds

[HereWeGoAgain]

What the hell are you even talking about?
Nobody is disputing that the Twin Towers were hit by planes.

actually four buildings went down-------the two towers, ---the nearby office building
and a local church-------the ONLY buildings directly hit by the planes were the two
towers. --------how many people were directly hit by the atom bomb dropped in
Hiroshima? Did you pass high school physics? I did

I assume you're referring to building seven which of course is part of the tower complex.
It just caught fire and magically collapsed.....into its own footprint.

And you want to talk physics? How is it possible for two towers with more damage to one side fall straight down into their own foot prints?

What the hell are you even talking about?
Nobody is disputing that the Twin Towers were hit by planes.

actually four buildings went down-------the two towers, ---the nearby office building
and a local church-------the ONLY buildings directly hit by the planes were the two
towers. --------how many people were directly hit by the atom bomb dropped in
Hiroshima? Did you pass high school physics? I did

I assume you're referring to building seven which of course is part of the tower complex.
It just caught fire and magically collapsed.....into its own footprint.

And you want to talk physics? How is it possible for two towers with more damage to one side fall straight down into their own foot prints?

PHYSICS------blast injury------- what it does to PEOPLE----it also does to local structures.
Simple model for the simple minded------you don't have to be hit by a bomb in order to
DIE FROM A BOMB------in fact you do not have to be HIT by anything other than the force
of the explosion. The collapse of the towers created a HUGE OUTPUT OF ENERGY--

you remember ENERGY E

You do realize that not a single modern day high rise has ever collapsed due to fire right?

what are we calling a "modern high rise"??? and how many have been struck by passenger
planes?

The twin towers were built to withstand plane strikes.
You sure are lacking when it comes to info on this subject.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The plasco building in Tehran.

Apparently Google is only your friend when it suits you

I said modern day building construction.

And it was

LOL...they're no better than the chinese.
Besides it was built in 1962 and was fraught with code violations.
In America it would have been condemned.
So no dice,try again.

1962 is the modern era

You are wrong and ignorant proven fact

Do some research ya blithering idiot!
The building had a shitload of code violations and was built like shit.

You asked for one in the modern era and got it.

Now you have to move the goal posts and backpedal.

Even if no other building had ever burnt down it proves.,........nothing

 

[Soupnazi630]

actually four buildings went down-------the two towers, ---the nearby office building
and a local church-------the ONLY buildings directly hit by the planes were the two
towers. --------how many people were directly hit by the atom bomb dropped in
Hiroshima? Did you pass high school physics? I did

I assume you're referring to building seven which of course is part of the tower complex.
It just caught fire and magically collapsed.....into its own footprint.

And you want to talk physics? How is it possible for two towers with more damage to one side fall straight down into their own foot prints?

actually four buildings went down-------the two towers, ---the nearby office building
and a local church-------the ONLY buildings directly hit by the planes were the two
towers. --------how many people were directly hit by the atom bomb dropped in
Hiroshima? Did you pass high school physics? I did

I assume you're referring to building seven which of course is part of the tower complex.
It just caught fire and magically collapsed.....into its own footprint.

And you want to talk physics? How is it possible for two towers with more damage to one side fall straight down into their own foot prints?

PHYSICS------blast injury------- what it does to PEOPLE----it also does to local structures.
Simple model for the simple minded------you don't have to be hit by a bomb in order to
DIE FROM A BOMB------in fact you do not have to be HIT by anything other than the force
of the explosion. The collapse of the towers created a HUGE OUTPUT OF ENERGY--

you remember ENERGY E

You do realize that not a single modern day high rise has ever collapsed due to fire right?

what are we calling a "modern high rise"??? and how many have been struck by passenger
planes?

The twin towers were built to withstand plane strikes.
You sure are lacking when it comes to info on this subject.

No they were not.

They we're designed to theoretically survive such ACCIDENTS not to withstand deliberate attacks with planes.

Designs do not always work as theorized

 

[Soupnazi630]

The lawyers for 9/11 truth have lots of stuff
that is not public knowledge yet, including definitive evidence of nanothermite particles in the dust at ground zero, proving that at least one of the three collapses was a controlled demolition ( Bldg 7 ).

All this will be presented to an independent grand jury this year.
View attachment 240990

No they do not actually as the so called dust from ground zero has no chain of custody making it worthless as evidence.

 

[the other mike]

Do some research ya blithering idiot!
The building had a shitload of code violations and was built like shit.

Which is why they had to privatize it under someone like Larry Silverstein who could later collect the $7 billion insurance claim. The previous owners -the Port Authority would have gone bankrupt having to remove the asbestos from the twin towers alone.That's when you get into the elevator shaft access during 'fireproofing' on certain floors, and other suspicious activities and circumstances before 9/11 happened.

 

[the other mike]

No they do not actually as the so called dust from ground zero has no chain of custody making it worthless as evidence.

Obviously you have proof of this ?
A grand jury can and will reopen the case as a criminal investigation.
This is just a long-awaited first step. The fact that the FBI is withholding evidence won't mean shit anymore.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No they do not actually as the so called dust from ground zero has no chain of custody making it worthless as evidence.

Prove it. ( you cannot, but I'll listen briefly )

That is not how this works


They need to prove the chain of custody and cannot

 

[the other mike]

No they do not actually as the so called dust from ground zero has no chain of custody making it worthless as evidence.

Prove it. ( you cannot, but I'll listen briefly )

That is not how this works


They need to prove the chain of custody and cannot

And have some black ops make it disappear.
These lawyers are not as stupid as you wish they were. ( for whatever reason you're guilty of....)

 

[the other mike]

No they do not actually as the so called dust from ground zero has no chain of custody making it worthless as evidence.

Prove it. ( you cannot, but I'll listen briefly )

That is not how this works


They need to prove the chain of custody and cannot

And have some black ops make it disappear.
These lawyers are not as stupid as you wish they were. ( for whatever reason you're guilty of....you obviously have some reason for being so ignorant and so persistently wrong)

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I said modern day building construction.

And it was

LOL...they're no better than the chinese.
Besides it was built in 1962 and was fraught with code violations.
In America it would have been condemned.
So no dice,try again.

1962 is the modern era

You are wrong and ignorant proven fact

Do some research ya blithering idiot!
The building had a shitload of code violations and was built like shit.

You asked for one in the modern era and got it.

Now you have to move the goal posts and backpedal.

Even if no other building had ever burnt down it proves.,........nothing

Oh bullshit.
1962 Iranian building practices were hardly modern construction.

 

[the other mike]

One of my favorite Twin Towers movie clips....



Good documentary on the construction of the World Trade Center.

 

[candycorn]

From my OP;

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

Yet no way could a building be clandestinely rigged for demolition then, much less, have two jumbo jets slam into them and set off exactly zero of the demolition charges.

So until you can account for the wiring of the buildings with nobody noticing…you’re nowhere; just where you were 17 years ago.

 

[TomParks]

The buildings were death traps that’s the crime here.

 

[the other mike]

The buildings were death traps that’s the crime here.

The crime is that there was never a criminal investigation and evidence was destroyed ( a felony itself - Michael Chertoff would be the first fall guy there)

 

[the other mike]

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."
Translation;

 

[the other mike]

By the way....someone mentioned the 'chain of custody' regarding nanothermite particles found at ground zero.

If the Grand Jury sees enough evidence to rule in favor
of opening a criminal investigation, all we have to do is exhume any one of the bodies and retrieve samples from their lungs full of dust that could have come from nowhere else, and it will be admissible in court.

 

[irosie91]

The lawyers for 9/11 truth have lots of stuff
that is not public knowledge yet, including definitive evidence of nanothermite particles in the dust at ground zero, proving that at least one of the three collapses was a controlled demolition ( Bldg 7 ).

All this will be presented to an independent grand jury this year.
View attachment 240990

nano-thermite---is nothing more than a mixture of an oxide of two metals
---usually aluminum and iron---and another metal. "OXIDE OF METAL" ---
means RUST. ----It is very UNSTABLE (that means holds lots of energy) ---
guess what----after a massive high energy event in a huge building------there was
some rust dust around

 

[the other mike]

nano-thermite---is nothing more than a mixture of an oxide of two metals
---usually aluminum and iron---and another metal. "OXIDE OF METAL" ---
means RUST. ----It is very UNSTABLE (that means holds lots of energy) ---
guess what----after a massive high energy event in a huge building------there was
some rust dust around

Wrong again as usual.
It must get tiring.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center
[Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.]
https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

 

[irosie91]

nano-thermite---is nothing more than a mixture of an oxide of two metals
---usually aluminum and iron---and another metal. "OXIDE OF METAL" ---
means RUST. ----It is very UNSTABLE (that means holds lots of energy) ---
guess what----after a massive high energy event in a huge building------there was
some rust dust around

Wrong again as usual.
It must get tiring.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center
[Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.]
https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf[/QUOT

BS did you pass high school physics? How about plane geometry. In my
experience-----people like you have big trouble with Euclidean geometry

 

[the other mike]

BS did you pass high school physics?

I won the high jump every year.