9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds

Whatever you say Huckleberry.
If you want to be another rodeo monkey
I know some people you'll like when you make it down to hell.



Another video nobody will watch.

One would think that you’d realize by now nobody cares about these vids. Put it in writing; what you think happened. I’m sure it will be amusing.

Ignorant by choice. Interesting concept.


You’re not that interesting.
 
March 12, 2019
Today, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry — with whom AE911Truth has partnered in our ongoing Grand Jury Investigation Project — announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information material to the federal grand jury investigation of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition on September 11, 2001.

The 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.

A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.

Lawyers' Committee 'Names Names' in New 9/11 Grand Jury Filing
 
March 12, 2019
Today, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry — with whom AE911Truth has partnered in our ongoing Grand Jury Investigation Project — announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information material to the federal grand jury investigation of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition on September 11, 2001.

The 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.

A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.

Lawyers' Committee 'Names Names' in New 9/11 Grand Jury Filing

Tw months ago, and yet nothing?
 
March 12, 2019
Today, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry — with whom AE911Truth has partnered in our ongoing Grand Jury Investigation Project — announced the filing of a “petition supplement” naming persons who may have information material to the federal grand jury investigation of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition on September 11, 2001.

The 33-page document contains 15 different categories of persons who may have information material to the investigation, including contractors and security companies that had access to the WTC Towers before 9/11, persons and entities who benefited financially from the WTC demolitions, and persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks.

A names-redacted version of the petition supplement, which was filed with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 14, 2019, has been made available to the public. The un-redacted version filed with the U.S. Attorney today will remain undisclosed in the interest of maintaining the secrecy, security, and integrity of the grand jury proceeding.

Lawyers' Committee 'Names Names' in New 9/11 Grand Jury Filing

Hang on for a minute. I'll need to get a tinfoil hat before I can properly read your post.
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint one of which only caught fire,modern high rise building dont collapse due to fire.
And to have the twin towers fall into their own footprint when one side received the most damage makes zero sense.
Common sense tells us they would have toppled in the direction of the damage.
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint one of which only caught fire,modern high rise building dont collapse due to fire.
And to have the twin towers fall into their own footprint when one side received the most damage makes zero sense.
Common sense tells us they would have toppled in the direction of the damage.

Well, except for that it makes perfect sense considering the structures of buildings, the towers had basically entire floors in a cross section of the building wiped out by the collision of the aircraft, and that gravity fucking works! This isn't a fucking Jenga game!

Only one of which caught fire? Are you that seriously retarded?
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint one of which only caught fire,modern high rise building dont collapse due to fire.
And to have the twin towers fall into their own footprint when one side received the most damage makes zero sense.
Common sense tells us they would have toppled in the direction of the damage.

Well, except for that it makes perfect sense considering the structures of buildings, the towers had basically entire floors in a cross section of the building wiped out by the collision of the aircraft, and that gravity fucking works! This isn't a fucking Jenga game!

Only one of which caught fire? Are you that seriously retarded?

One of which ONLY caught fire.
Fucken dumbass.
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint one of which only caught fire,modern high rise building dont collapse due to fire.
And to have the twin towers fall into their own footprint when one side received the most damage makes zero sense.
Common sense tells us they would have toppled in the direction of the damage.

Well, except for that it makes perfect sense considering the structures of buildings, the towers had basically entire floors in a cross section of the building wiped out by the collision of the aircraft, and that gravity fucking works! This isn't a fucking Jenga game!

Only one of which caught fire? Are you that seriously retarded?

One of which ONLY caught fire.
Fucken dumbass.

All three buildings were on fire, fuckwad!

Stop taking "How stupid can you get?" as a challenge!
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint one of which only caught fire,modern high rise building dont collapse due to fire.
And to have the twin towers fall into their own footprint when one side received the most damage makes zero sense.
Common sense tells us they would have toppled in the direction of the damage.

Well, except for that it makes perfect sense considering the structures of buildings, the towers had basically entire floors in a cross section of the building wiped out by the collision of the aircraft, and that gravity fucking works! This isn't a fucking Jenga game!

Only one of which caught fire? Are you that seriously retarded?

One of which ONLY caught fire.
Fucken dumbass.

All three buildings were on fire, fuckwad!

Are ya fucken stupid!!
ONE OF WHICH ONLY CAUGHT FIRE!!!!
To people with a brain that would indicate it wasnt hit by a fucken jumbo jet you dumbshit!!!
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint
Why the fuck do you idiots keep saying that the buildings fell into their own footprint?

Are you fucking blind?



All someone had to do was suggest that the building fell into it's own footprint, and you fucking idiots believe it despite the clear video evidence that proves that is NOT what happened.

You are a feeble-minded brainwashed idiot.
 
Last edited:
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint
Why the fuck do you idiots keep saying that the buildings fell into their own footprint?

Are you fucking blind?

Because they did.
The video evidence shows that you are wrong. The video clearly shows that gigantic pieces fell off to the side and into the fucking street. However, since you are incredibly feeble-minded, the power of suggestion has you convinced you otherwise.
 
,falling in their own foot print,
Why do you nutjobs always say that?

Because it defies logic to have three buildings fall into their own footprint
Why the fuck do you idiots keep saying that the buildings fell into their own footprint?

Are you fucking blind?

Because they did.
The video evidence shows that you are wrong. The video clearly shows that gigantic pieces fell off to the side and into the fucking street. However, since you are incredibly feeble-minded, the power of suggestion has you convinced you otherwise.

WOW!!!
Two 1368 foot buildings collapse and some debris fall into the street. Which of course is common with controlled demolitions.
Where the fuck do you think some of the debris are going to go when you're piling a 1368 foot structure into a city block?
 
Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.


On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants
I understand the hijackers were wearing MAGA hats.
 

Forum List

Back
Top