Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell you what you mandate that every car has to have a breathalyzer ignition lock out and that everyone must retrofit all existing cars on the road because obviously if a person drives drunk the people who don't drive drunk are responsible for it
I'd have no problem making breathalizyers standard equipment on cars.
Thing is, if we banned all cars tomorrow, our economy would collapse.
If we banned all guns tomorrow.... the only people who'd know the difference are the gun nuts contending with their tiny dicks.
If someone told me people that say something should be done a certain way but won't do a damn thing themselves about it, I'd think of you.
Somehow, given the fact you are here all day and don't seem to have a job, I suspect you aren't doing anything for yourself.
I've already shown another one of you idiots that the guns used in the 2nd deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history weren't the kind you say people have to have in order to have mass shootings.
No, but they were used in teh 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th...
Yet, you're right here at the same time.
I have people working for me. They don't have the same shitty attitude you have or they wouldn't be working FOR me.
The problem is when what is the 2nd was the 1st, and it was until recently, you idiots used the same arguments you use now.
No. The problem is that *you* don't think anything is reasonable
We have thousands of reasonable gun laws on the books already
well, not in all states. which is why guns come from the south up into NYC
the system of background checks should be good enough to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, crazies, abusers and people on the terrorist watch list.
and perhaps the way to view it is this.... about 90% of the people in this country agree on the above parameters. should they be thwarted because the NRA gives money to the people responsible for the governance of our country?
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Criminals can't pass background checks...so they use people who can pass background checks....right now, for federal background checks..that is how they are getting guns to New York....so what will you do to improve background checks for people who can pass them already?
the 90% are uniformed on the issue..they take people like you for their word, not realizing that what you really want is gun registration like in Germany, Britain and Australia, which will then allow you to ban and confiscate guns at a later date.......
so much stupid in that post its comical.
what on earth does who the killer's father supports have to do with anything? my father is a republican. and??? idiot.
the rest of what you said is nonsense....
I want a background check rigorous enough to know who is on the terrorist watch list so that if they get a gun, the FBI and homeland security know about it.
I want gun laws rigorous enough to keep the guns from the southern states out of our state.
I want the controls that 90% of this country asked for and support..... without the obstruction of the NRA shills.
d'uh.
I would be disappointed if my daughters turned out to be Liberals. They were taught better.
Mine taught me at a young age that when you want something, you have two options. Shit in one hand, want in the other, and see which one fills up quicker. All that means is you don't necessarily get what you want.
As far as that 90%, apply the if you don't want one don't get one mindset those of us that aren't women are told to apply when it comes to abortions.
Yet, you're right here at the same time.
I have people working for me. They don't have the same shitty attitude you have or they wouldn't be working FOR me.
No, I'm here on my lunch break... you just aren't very smart, are you?
Somehow, I wouldn't be very inspired by a boss who was sitting in his office all day ranting like a crazy person on line while I was out doing the hard work.
Obviously, "Leading by example" isn't one of those things you've heard of.
We have thousands of reasonable gun laws on the books already
well, not in all states. which is why guns come from the south up into NYC
the system of background checks should be good enough to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, crazies, abusers and people on the terrorist watch list.
and perhaps the way to view it is this.... about 90% of the people in this country agree on the above parameters. should they be thwarted because the NRA gives money to the people responsible for the governance of our country?
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Criminals can't pass background checks...so they use people who can pass background checks....right now, for federal background checks..that is how they are getting guns to New York....so what will you do to improve background checks for people who can pass them already?
the 90% are uniformed on the issue..they take people like you for their word, not realizing that what you really want is gun registration like in Germany, Britain and Australia, which will then allow you to ban and confiscate guns at a later date.......
so much stupid in that post its comical.
what on earth does who the killer's father supports have to do with anything? my father is a republican. and??? idiot.
the rest of what you said is nonsense....
I want a background check rigorous enough to know who is on the terrorist watch list so that if they get a gun, the FBI and homeland security know about it.
I want gun laws rigorous enough to keep the guns from the southern states out of our state.
I want the controls that 90% of this country asked for and support..... without the obstruction of the NRA shills.
d'uh.
I would be disappointed if my daughters turned out to be Liberals. They were taught better.
Mine taught me at a young age that when you want something, you have two options. Shit in one hand, want in the other, and see which one fills up quicker. All that means is you don't necessarily get what you want.
As far as that 90%, apply the if you don't want one don't get one mindset those of us that aren't women are told to apply when it comes to abortions.
then you're an idiot.
given your posts, I doubt you had anything to teach.
and your 90% analogy to reproductive choices is absurd. if a woman chooses to terminate a pregnancy, it's none of your business and doesn't affect you.
if because you're an NRA shill, guns come to NY, then it affects us here.
as to your purported rights, a) until Scalia polluted our body of caselaw with Heller, there was no individual rigfht of gun ownership (that whole "well-regulated militia" thing); and b) even under Heller, reasonable regulation is permissible so long as it isn't a ban.... same as with reproductive choice....which is why the heavy handed BS passed by the Texas legislature got the ax. Best decision for reproductive rights in ages.
see what happens when rightwingnuts overplay their hands.
btw, if your daughters' politics could "disappoint" you, you're disgusting. just saying. me and my dad? we've discussed issues our whole lives. we'd be bored if we agreed.
but then again, he's not an ass.
Tell you what you mandate that every car has to have a breathalyzer ignition lock out and that everyone must retrofit all existing cars on the road because obviously if a person drives drunk the people who don't drive drunk are responsible for it
I'd have no problem making breathalizyers standard equipment on cars.
Thing is, if we banned all cars tomorrow, our economy would collapse.
If we banned all guns tomorrow.... the only people who'd know the difference are the gun nuts contending with their tiny dicks.
The problem is when what is the 2nd was the 1st, and it was until recently, you idiots used the same arguments you use now.
Yawn, guy. Point was, yes, I guess you can find that case where someone who never, ever should have had a gun didn't use a machine gun to kill lots of unarmed people... but the fact is, he still never should have had a gun.
This is a guy whose behavior was considered so disturbing on campus that the facutly had to have him privately tutored because he scared the shit out of the coeds.
But he was able to walk into a gun store, pretty as you please and buy a bunch of guns and ammo...
It was not a badly written anything. It was a guarantee that the people could always have a means to reject a tyrannical gov't.
Again, by that logic, then, Mateen was expressing his "rights". I mean, right. If your purpose is to use violence to acheive an end, Mateen was a hero by you guys.
First show me anyone who walked out of a gun store with a machine gun and 100 round clip.
Second, did he seem "clearly disturbed" in the gun store? Or was that just later?
Third, as I have asked before, is this what he looked like in the gun store?
Good point. We should have all gun sales videotaped. If you can't produce a videotape of the gun sale, it's assumed you did something wrong when you sold it to him, and OFF TO PRISON YOU GO, BUDDY!!!!
Tell you what you mandate that every car has to have a breathalyzer ignition lock out and that everyone must retrofit all existing cars on the road because obviously if a person drives drunk the people who don't drive drunk are responsible for it
I'd have no problem making breathalizyers standard equipment on cars.
Thing is, if we banned all cars tomorrow, our economy would collapse.
If we banned all guns tomorrow.... the only people who'd know the difference are the gun nuts contending with their tiny dicks.
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Then those FBI agents should be fired. Tomorrow. GROSS INCOMPETENCE should be stamped on their files.
And we keep firing people until they do it right.
well, not in all states. which is why guns come from the south up into NYC
the system of background checks should be good enough to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, crazies, abusers and people on the terrorist watch list.
and perhaps the way to view it is this.... about 90% of the people in this country agree on the above parameters. should they be thwarted because the NRA gives money to the people responsible for the governance of our country?
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Criminals can't pass background checks...so they use people who can pass background checks....right now, for federal background checks..that is how they are getting guns to New York....so what will you do to improve background checks for people who can pass them already?
the 90% are uniformed on the issue..they take people like you for their word, not realizing that what you really want is gun registration like in Germany, Britain and Australia, which will then allow you to ban and confiscate guns at a later date.......
so much stupid in that post its comical.
what on earth does who the killer's father supports have to do with anything? my father is a republican. and??? idiot.
the rest of what you said is nonsense....
I want a background check rigorous enough to know who is on the terrorist watch list so that if they get a gun, the FBI and homeland security know about it.
I want gun laws rigorous enough to keep the guns from the southern states out of our state.
I want the controls that 90% of this country asked for and support..... without the obstruction of the NRA shills.
d'uh.
I would be disappointed if my daughters turned out to be Liberals. They were taught better.
Mine taught me at a young age that when you want something, you have two options. Shit in one hand, want in the other, and see which one fills up quicker. All that means is you don't necessarily get what you want.
As far as that 90%, apply the if you don't want one don't get one mindset those of us that aren't women are told to apply when it comes to abortions.
then you're an idiot.
given your posts, I doubt you had anything to teach.
and your 90% analogy to reproductive choices is absurd. if a woman chooses to terminate a pregnancy, it's none of your business and doesn't affect you.
if because you're an NRA shill, guns come to NY, then it affects us here.
as to your purported rights, a) until Scalia polluted our body of caselaw with Heller, there was no individual rigfht of gun ownership (that whole "well-regulated militia" thing); and b) even under Heller, reasonable regulation is permissible so long as it isn't a ban.... same as with reproductive choice....which is why the heavy handed BS passed by the Texas legislature got the ax. Best decision for reproductive rights in ages.
see what happens when rightwingnuts overplay their hands.
btw, if your daughters' politics could "disappoint" you, you're disgusting. just saying. me and my dad? we've discussed issues our whole lives. we'd be bored if we agreed.
but then again, he's not an ass.
If I legally own one gun or one thousand it's none of your business and does not affect you
Let's clarify things a bit. By definition, a "machine gun" continues to fire as long as you hold the trigger back and have ammo.
If the gun cannot do that, it is not a machine gun. You could say "as far as I am concerned, a horse is a fish". But it doesn't change the facts of what a horse is.
Yawn, guy, Mateen was able to kill 49 people with his machine gun. Joker holmes killed 17 and wounded another 50 before his jammed.
Looks like that horse is a pretty good swimmer.
We have thousands of reasonable gun laws on the books already
well, not in all states. which is why guns come from the south up into NYC
the system of background checks should be good enough to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, crazies, abusers and people on the terrorist watch list.
and perhaps the way to view it is this.... about 90% of the people in this country agree on the above parameters. should they be thwarted because the NRA gives money to the people responsible for the governance of our country?
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Criminals can't pass background checks...so they use people who can pass background checks....right now, for federal background checks..that is how they are getting guns to New York....so what will you do to improve background checks for people who can pass them already?
the 90% are uniformed on the issue..they take people like you for their word, not realizing that what you really want is gun registration like in Germany, Britain and Australia, which will then allow you to ban and confiscate guns at a later date.......
so much stupid in that post its comical.
what on earth does who the killer's father supports have to do with anything? my father is a republican. and??? idiot.
the rest of what you said is nonsense....
I want a background check rigorous enough to know who is on the terrorist watch list so that if they get a gun, the FBI and homeland security know about it.
I want gun laws rigorous enough to keep the guns from the southern states out of our state.
I want the controls that 90% of this country asked for and support..... without the obstruction of the NRA shills.
d'uh.
I would be disappointed if my daughters turned out to be Liberals. They were taught better.
Mine taught me at a young age that when you want something, you have two options. Shit in one hand, want in the other, and see which one fills up quicker. All that means is you don't necessarily get what you want.
As far as that 90%, apply the if you don't want one don't get one mindset those of us that aren't women are told to apply when it comes to abortions.
then you're an idiot.
given your posts, I doubt you had anything to teach.
and your 90% analogy to reproductive choices is absurd. if a woman chooses to terminate a pregnancy, it's none of your business and doesn't affect you.
if because you're an NRA shill, guns come to NY, then it affects us here.
as to your purported rights, a) until Scalia polluted our body of caselaw with Heller, there was no individual rigfht of gun ownership (that whole "well-regulated militia" thing); and b) even under Heller, reasonable regulation is permissible so long as it isn't a ban.... same as with reproductive choice....which is why the heavy handed BS passed by the Texas legislature got the ax. Best decision for reproductive rights in ages.
see what happens when rightwingnuts overplay their hands.
btw, if your daughters' politics could "disappoint" you, you're disgusting. just saying. me and my dad? we've discussed issues our whole lives. we'd be bored if we agreed.
but then again, he's not an ass.
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Criminals can't pass background checks...so they use people who can pass background checks....right now, for federal background checks..that is how they are getting guns to New York....so what will you do to improve background checks for people who can pass them already?
the 90% are uniformed on the issue..they take people like you for their word, not realizing that what you really want is gun registration like in Germany, Britain and Australia, which will then allow you to ban and confiscate guns at a later date.......
so much stupid in that post its comical.
what on earth does who the killer's father supports have to do with anything? my father is a republican. and??? idiot.
the rest of what you said is nonsense....
I want a background check rigorous enough to know who is on the terrorist watch list so that if they get a gun, the FBI and homeland security know about it.
I want gun laws rigorous enough to keep the guns from the southern states out of our state.
I want the controls that 90% of this country asked for and support..... without the obstruction of the NRA shills.
d'uh.
I would be disappointed if my daughters turned out to be Liberals. They were taught better.
Mine taught me at a young age that when you want something, you have two options. Shit in one hand, want in the other, and see which one fills up quicker. All that means is you don't necessarily get what you want.
As far as that 90%, apply the if you don't want one don't get one mindset those of us that aren't women are told to apply when it comes to abortions.
then you're an idiot.
given your posts, I doubt you had anything to teach.
and your 90% analogy to reproductive choices is absurd. if a woman chooses to terminate a pregnancy, it's none of your business and doesn't affect you.
if because you're an NRA shill, guns come to NY, then it affects us here.
as to your purported rights, a) until Scalia polluted our body of caselaw with Heller, there was no individual rigfht of gun ownership (that whole "well-regulated militia" thing); and b) even under Heller, reasonable regulation is permissible so long as it isn't a ban.... same as with reproductive choice....which is why the heavy handed BS passed by the Texas legislature got the ax. Best decision for reproductive rights in ages.
see what happens when rightwingnuts overplay their hands.
btw, if your daughters' politics could "disappoint" you, you're disgusting. just saying. me and my dad? we've discussed issues our whole lives. we'd be bored if we agreed.
but then again, he's not an ass.
If I legally own one gun or one thousand it's none of your business and does not affect you
not if you aren't a criminal, an abuser, a crazy or on the terrorist watch list.
did I say I wanted to limit your ability to buy a gun? unless you are one of the above, then I don't think anyone said any such thing.
You do realize that the Orlando Night club shooter, the guy who murdered 49 men....whose father supports hilary clinton.......went through 3 background checks....one for his work as a security guard......one, 10 month deep investigation by the FBI......and one for each gun he purchased.....plus he had 3 interviews with 3 trained FBI interrogators......and they still gave him a pass...
How much more rigorous do you want background checks to be?
Criminals can't pass background checks...so they use people who can pass background checks....right now, for federal background checks..that is how they are getting guns to New York....so what will you do to improve background checks for people who can pass them already?
the 90% are uniformed on the issue..they take people like you for their word, not realizing that what you really want is gun registration like in Germany, Britain and Australia, which will then allow you to ban and confiscate guns at a later date.......
so much stupid in that post its comical.
what on earth does who the killer's father supports have to do with anything? my father is a republican. and??? idiot.
the rest of what you said is nonsense....
I want a background check rigorous enough to know who is on the terrorist watch list so that if they get a gun, the FBI and homeland security know about it.
I want gun laws rigorous enough to keep the guns from the southern states out of our state.
I want the controls that 90% of this country asked for and support..... without the obstruction of the NRA shills.
d'uh.
I would be disappointed if my daughters turned out to be Liberals. They were taught better.
Mine taught me at a young age that when you want something, you have two options. Shit in one hand, want in the other, and see which one fills up quicker. All that means is you don't necessarily get what you want.
As far as that 90%, apply the if you don't want one don't get one mindset those of us that aren't women are told to apply when it comes to abortions.
then you're an idiot.
given your posts, I doubt you had anything to teach.
and your 90% analogy to reproductive choices is absurd. if a woman chooses to terminate a pregnancy, it's none of your business and doesn't affect you.
if because you're an NRA shill, guns come to NY, then it affects us here.
as to your purported rights, a) until Scalia polluted our body of caselaw with Heller, there was no individual rigfht of gun ownership (that whole "well-regulated militia" thing); and b) even under Heller, reasonable regulation is permissible so long as it isn't a ban.... same as with reproductive choice....which is why the heavy handed BS passed by the Texas legislature got the ax. Best decision for reproductive rights in ages.
see what happens when rightwingnuts overplay their hands.
btw, if your daughters' politics could "disappoint" you, you're disgusting. just saying. me and my dad? we've discussed issues our whole lives. we'd be bored if we agreed.
but then again, he's not an ass.
If I legally own one gun or one thousand it's none of your business and does not affect you
not if you aren't a criminal, an abuser, a crazy or on the terrorist watch list.
did I say I wanted to limit your ability to buy a gun? unless you are one of the above, then I don't think anyone said any such thing.
The problem is when what is the 2nd was the 1st, and it was until recently, you idiots used the same arguments you use now.
Yawn, guy. Point was, yes, I guess you can find that case where someone who never, ever should have had a gun didn't use a machine gun to kill lots of unarmed people... but the fact is, he still never should have had a gun.
This is a guy whose behavior was considered so disturbing on campus that the facutly had to have him privately tutored because he scared the shit out of the coeds.
But he was able to walk into a gun store, pretty as you please and buy a bunch of guns and ammo...
