911 Flight 77 "The Official Pentagon Light Pole Mower"

[daws101]

Pole-Safe® Omni-Directional Breakaway Supports for Poles

Transpo's "Double Neck" Pole-Safe® breakaway support system is designed for poles located within roadside clear zones and other locations vulnerable to vehicular impacts. The primary component of the system is a high-strength coupling, designed to break away quickly and cleanly upon impact, thus saving lives and reducing property damage. Pole-Safe® couplings are omni-directional, meaning the system breaks away with consistent, predictable behavior, regardless of the vehicle's angle of impact..






none of the light standards at the pentagon were sliced in half but broke at the base as they were designed to do..
The poles are built to break.Car hits it at 50 and the pole snaps and the car continues in motion for fractions of a second more, the force is greatly decreased. Still large, but not as much. How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force. missed it here's the answer again....How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force.

oh btw flight 77 did not have to hit the poles to knock them down the blast from the exhaust of any one of the engines would be more then enough..... The RollsRoyce RB211-524 engine is rated at 58,000 to 60,000 lbs of thrust...

 

[KokomoJojo]

Pole-Safe® Omni-Directional Breakaway Supports for Poles

Transpo's "Double Neck" Pole-Safe® breakaway support system is designed for poles located within roadside clear zones and other locations vulnerable to vehicular impacts. The primary component of the system is a high-strength coupling, designed to break away quickly and cleanly upon impact, thus saving lives and reducing property damage. Pole-Safe® couplings are omni-directional, meaning the system breaks away with consistent, predictable behavior, regardless of the vehicle's angle of impact..






none of the light standards at the pentagon were sliced in half but broke at the base as they were designed to do..
The poles are built to break.Car hits it at 50 and the pole snaps and the car continues in motion for fractions of a second more, the force is greatly decreased. Still large, but not as much. How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force. missed it here's the answer again....How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force.

oh btw flight 77 did not have to hit the poles to knock them down the blast from the exhaust of any one of the engines would be more then enough..... The RollsRoyce RB211-524 engine is rated at 58,000 to 60,000 lbs of thrust...

the knife is a balanced vertical upright, no mount.

geezus, try taking the stoopid hat off before posting in this thread k.

If you cant at least read one or 2 pages back so you have a fucking clue what is going on here.

We saw the freaking planes hit the towers. Brave Americans reported to friends and loved ones that they were hijacked before they brought the plane down in a remote area in Pa. WTF are people thinking when they claim that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon? If you want to play the conspiracy game pick a conspiracy that make sense for God's sake.

you saw a tv show!



yeh troughers would have you believe this is true:









I posted a real plane but that doesnt seem to make any difference

I ain't got a clue about the video but most stable people would consider that an aerodynamic stable mass of 225,000 lbs hurtling through the air at 500 mph will surely throw light posts out of the way when it crashes into a stable mass seconds later. We have hundreds of juicy conspiracies that we could deal with but the tin foil left seems to want to dispute video and empirical evidence in favor of a political conspiracy. You can almost laugh when the conspiracy theorists desperately want to keep the Clinton administration out of the conspiracy.

So to assist everyone in determining who is who out here I posted this very simply little high school physics problem to see who was an expert at physics and who was not

So riddle me this batman;




the knife is balanced vertical upright, no mount.









thats where we left off.

 

[Gamolon]

there is no error, you may disagree with the question, to bad, however it has a single correct answer that can be expressed mathematically. be my guest.

Oh yes there are!



Two GLARING mistakes that make you look foolish.

My disagreeing with your question has nothing to do with the fact that you messed up the particulars of the question.

What a joke.



Now are you versed enough in physics/mathematics to find out what your two issues are?

hey, no one is forcing you to figure out a problem you do not understand k. No pressure, no one expects you to answer in the first place much less actually get it correct, so dont worry about it. Sooner or later someone who is qualified may come along then we can continue trashing troughers and their police state movement.

Can't figure out where your errors are?

Pathetic for someone who is implying they "think" they know what they are talking about.

Why don't you ask your "troofer" brethren to help you out?

 

[KokomoJojo]

Oh yes there are!



Two GLARING mistakes that make you look foolish.

My disagreeing with your question has nothing to do with the fact that you messed up the particulars of the question.

What a joke.



Now are you versed enough in physics/mathematics to find out what your two issues are?

hey, no one is forcing you to figure out a problem you do not understand k. No pressure, no one expects you to answer in the first place much less actually get it correct, so dont worry about it. Sooner or later someone who is qualified may come along then we can continue trashing troughers and their police state movement.

Can't figure out where your errors are?

Pathetic for someone who is implying they "think" they know what they are talking about.

Why don't you ask your "troofer" brethren to help you out?

heard you the first time.

stop dodging, grow a pair, and take your best shot at inventing an error.

then its my turn.

waiting.

 

[Gamolon]

hey, no one is forcing you to figure out a problem you do not understand k. No pressure, no one expects you to answer in the first place much less actually get it correct, so dont worry about it. Sooner or later someone who is qualified may come along then we can continue trashing troughers and their police state movement.

Can't figure out where your errors are?

Pathetic for someone who is implying they "think" they know what they are talking about.

Why don't you ask your "troofer" brethren to help you out?

heard you the first time.

stop dodging, grow a pair, and take your best shot at inventing an error.

then its my turn.

waiting.

Inventing an error?



Does this mean you don't know where you screwed up? There are two glaring errors that you should see within your "fizix" question. What are they Mr. Mathematician?

Did you make that question up all by yourself?

 

[daws101]

Pole-Safe® Omni-Directional Breakaway Supports for Poles

Transpo's "Double Neck" Pole-Safe® breakaway support system is designed for poles located within roadside clear zones and other locations vulnerable to vehicular impacts. The primary component of the system is a high-strength coupling, designed to break away quickly and cleanly upon impact, thus saving lives and reducing property damage. Pole-Safe® couplings are omni-directional, meaning the system breaks away with consistent, predictable behavior, regardless of the vehicle's angle of impact..






none of the light standards at the pentagon were sliced in half but broke at the base as they were designed to do..
The poles are built to break.Car hits it at 50 and the pole snaps and the car continues in motion for fractions of a second more, the force is greatly decreased. Still large, but not as much. How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force. missed it here's the answer again....How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force.

oh btw flight 77 did not have to hit the poles to knock them down the blast from the exhaust of any one of the engines would be more then enough..... The RollsRoyce RB211-524 engine is rated at 58,000 to 60,000 lbs of thrust...

the knife is a balanced vertical upright, no mount.

geezus, try taking the stoopid hat off before posting in this thread k.

If you cant at least read one or 2 pages back so you have a fucking clue what is going on here.

We saw the freaking planes hit the towers. Brave Americans reported to friends and loved ones that they were hijacked before they brought the plane down in a remote area in Pa. WTF are people thinking when they claim that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon? If you want to play the conspiracy game pick a conspiracy that make sense for God's sake.

you saw a tv show!



yeh troughers would have you believe this is true:









I posted a real plane but that doesnt seem to make any difference

I ain't got a clue about the video but most stable people would consider that an aerodynamic stable mass of 225,000 lbs hurtling through the air at 500 mph will surely throw light posts out of the way when it crashes into a stable mass seconds later. We have hundreds of juicy conspiracies that we could deal with but the tin foil left seems to want to dispute video and empirical evidence in favor of a political conspiracy. You can almost laugh when the conspiracy theorists desperately want to keep the Clinton administration out of the conspiracy.

So to assist everyone in determining who is who out here I posted this very simply little high school physics problem to see who was an expert at physics and who was not

So riddle me this batman;




the knife is balanced vertical upright, no mount.









thats where we left off.

wow the long dodge..

 

[daws101]

D. S. Khavkin, from the eighth floor of a high-rise building:
"... knocked down a number of street lamp poles"
BBC NEWS | Talking Point | More eyewitness accounts of the attack on the US

Kirk Milburn, a construction supervisor for Atlantis Co. was on the exit of Interstate 395.
"... saw debris flying. I guess it was hitting light poles."
washingtonpost.com
Afework Hagos, 26, of Arlington, stuck in a traffic jam on Columbia Pike,
"It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lamp posts .."
Pentagon eyewitness accounts | World news | The Guardian
Kat Gaines, a Fairfax County Fire & Rescue technician was heading south on Route 110, by the parking lots to the south when she saw a "low-flying jetliner strike the top of nearby telephone poles." She "then heard the plane power up" and plunge into the Pentagon.
http://www.fccc.org/News/valor.htm
Vin Narayanan, a reporter for USA TODAY was driving near the Pentagon
USATODAY.com - 'I fear for my daughter'
"The tail of the plane clipped the overhanging exit sign above me"
USATODAY.com - 'Tomorrow always belongs to us'
Rodney Washington, a systems engineer for a Pentagon contractor, was stuck in the traffic a few hundred yards away:
"... knocking over light poles "
Boston Globe Online / Nation | World / After assault on Pentagon, orderly response
Steve Riskus took pictures less then 1 minute after the impact
http://www.criticalthrash.com/terror/crashthumbnails.html
"It knocked over a few light poles on its way..."
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/s11-media/et7.jpg
Father Stephen McGraw was waiting on the northbound side of Washington Boulevard. driving to a graveside service at Arlington
"The plane clipped the top of a light pole just before it got to us, injuring a taxi driver, whose taxi was just a few feet away from my car.
http://www.dcmilitary.com/army/pentagram/6_39/local_news/10772-1.html
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/Pentagon_crash_eyewitness_comforted_victims.html

Jim R. Cissell, a former photojournalist, drives past the Pentagon every day on his way to work at the Newseum in Arlington, Va.
Tristate residents touched by tragedy
.".. taking out telephone and power lines on its way in, hit the building."
http://www.cincypost.com/attack/cissel091201.html
Noel Sepulveda, a Master Sgt. was walking back to his motorcycle in the Pentagon South Car Park
It "The plane’s right wheel struck a light pole, causing it to fly at a 45-degree angle.".", he said.
The plane tried to recover, but hit a second light pole and continued flying at an angle. "You could hear the engines being revved up even higher,"
http://www.af.mil/news/Apr2002/n20020415_0585.shtml
Colonel Bruce Elliott, a World War II and Korean War Chemical Mortar Battalion veteran and a former commander of the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant wasalso in the Parking Lot
"... the craft clipped a utility pole guide wire, which may have slowed it down a bit"
http://www.thehawkeye.com/features/911/IdxThur.html
Air Force Honor Guard members were at the end of the cemetery directly across the highway from the Pentagon.
" They had heard, some had seen a plane coming in skimming trees and light poles."
Upcoming Events | Converge Worldwide
Mark Bright, 32, a traffic patrol officer was the first to arrive at the scene after seeing the plane from his guard booth by the Mall Entrance.
"-- at the height of the street lights. It knocked a couple down."
He also said he heard the plane "power-up"
http://www.dcmilitary.com/marines/hendersonhall/6_39/local_news/10797-1.html
http://206.181.245.163/ebird/e20011108vivid.htm
Wanda Ramey, a DPS master patrol office watched from the Mall plaza booth.
"I saw the wing of the plane clip the light post, and it made the plane slant. Then the engine revved up."
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/Pentagon_policeman.html
Michael Anthony K (aka 'Mimi Angelica') a 42-year-old firefighter-paramedic saw
"...poles lying on the ground that had apparently been knocked over by the plane as it headed for the building."
http://www.angelfire.com/grrl/mimiangelica/advocate.html
Mike Walter, 46, a USA Today reporter, said
"...It turned and then it went around ..it clipped one of these light poles."
Recorded interview - quick load Recorded interview - best quality
Richard Benedetto, another USA TODAY reporter said,
The only thing we saw on the ground outside there was a piece of a ... the tail of a lamp post.
Recorded interview - quick load / May 2002. Recorded interview - best quality / May 2002.
A Pentagon Navy Admiral said,
"It was a good size jet aircraft. I saw it clip a light pole but keep coming ..."
Houston Chronicle, 9/11/01 - Michael Hedges
(mirror) http://www2.hawaii.edu/~julianr/lexisnexis/clark.txt
Don Fortunato, a plainclothes detective with the Arlington (Va.) Police Department, was walking into his office when he heard a muffled explosion. He dashed to the scene.
“Traffic was at a standstill, so I parked on the shoulder, not far from the scene and ran to the site. Next to me was a cab from D.C., its windshield smashed out by pieces of lampposts. There were pieces of the plane all over the highway, pieces of wing, I think.”

LaVern L Schueller, a Military Chaplain surveyed the scene after the event.
"The top of a light pole was knocked off on an overpass. The FBI had marked it as evidence. The top of a light pole had been knocked off on the street that goes by the Pentagon. It too was marked as evidence. And finally, it took out the entire light pole near the sidewalk.
http://www.aapc.org/prayer.htm
http://www.nwfdailynews.com/archive/bill_campbell/010923col1.html
Frank Probst, dove to the ground to avoid a passing jet engine.
"On either side of him, three streetlights had been sheared in half by the airliner's wings at 12 to 15 feet above the ground. An engine had clipped the antenna off a Jeep Grand Cherokee stalled in traffic not far away."
http://www.militarycity.com/sept11/fortress1.html

 

[KokomoJojo]

Pole-Safe® Omni-Directional Breakaway Supports for Poles

Transpo's "Double Neck" Pole-Safe® breakaway support system is designed for poles located within roadside clear zones and other locations vulnerable to vehicular impacts. The primary component of the system is a high-strength coupling, designed to break away quickly and cleanly upon impact, thus saving lives and reducing property damage. Pole-Safe® couplings are omni-directional, meaning the system breaks away with consistent, predictable behavior, regardless of the vehicle's angle of impact..






none of the light standards at the pentagon were sliced in half but broke at the base as they were designed to do..
The poles are built to break.Car hits it at 50 and the pole snaps and the car continues in motion for fractions of a second more, the force is greatly decreased. Still large, but not as much. How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force. missed it here's the answer again....How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force.

oh btw flight 77 did not have to hit the poles to knock them down the blast from the exhaust of any one of the engines would be more then enough..... The RollsRoyce RB211-524 engine is rated at 58,000 to 60,000 lbs of thrust...

the knife is a balanced vertical upright, no mount.

geezus, try taking the stoopid hat off before posting in this thread k.

If you cant at least read one or 2 pages back so you have a fucking clue what is going on here.



you saw a tv show!



yeh troughers would have you believe this is true:









I posted a real plane but that doesnt seem to make any difference

I ain't got a clue about the video but most stable people would consider that an aerodynamic stable mass of 225,000 lbs hurtling through the air at 500 mph will surely throw light posts out of the way when it crashes into a stable mass seconds later. We have hundreds of juicy conspiracies that we could deal with but the tin foil left seems to want to dispute video and empirical evidence in favor of a political conspiracy. You can almost laugh when the conspiracy theorists desperately want to keep the Clinton administration out of the conspiracy.

So to assist everyone in determining who is who out here I posted this very simply little high school physics problem to see who was an expert at physics and who was not

So riddle me this batman;




the knife is balanced vertical upright, no mount.









thats where we left off.

wow the long dodge..

still clueless how the world works, you can stick your witnesses where the sun dont shine if what they seen does not match the material evidence.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Pole-Safe® Omni-Directional Breakaway Supports for Poles

Transpo's "Double Neck" Pole-Safe® breakaway support system is designed for poles located within roadside clear zones and other locations vulnerable to vehicular impacts. The primary component of the system is a high-strength coupling, designed to break away quickly and cleanly upon impact, thus saving lives and reducing property damage. Pole-Safe® couplings are omni-directional, meaning the system breaks away with consistent, predictable behavior, regardless of the vehicle's angle of impact..






none of the light standards at the pentagon were sliced in half but broke at the base as they were designed to do..
The poles are built to break.Car hits it at 50 and the pole snaps and the car continues in motion for fractions of a second more, the force is greatly decreased. Still large, but not as much. How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force. missed it here's the answer again....How strong the force ends up being is the inverse square of the time it takes to apply the force.

oh btw flight 77 did not have to hit the poles to knock them down the blast from the exhaust of any one of the engines would be more then enough..... The RollsRoyce RB211-524 engine is rated at 58,000 to 60,000 lbs of thrust...

the knife is a balanced vertical upright, no mount.

geezus, try taking the stoopid hat off before posting in this thread k.

If you cant at least read one or 2 pages back so you have a fucking clue what is going on here.



you saw a tv show!



yeh troughers would have you believe this is true:









I posted a real plane but that doesnt seem to make any difference

I ain't got a clue about the video but most stable people would consider that an aerodynamic stable mass of 225,000 lbs hurtling through the air at 500 mph will surely throw light posts out of the way when it crashes into a stable mass seconds later. We have hundreds of juicy conspiracies that we could deal with but the tin foil left seems to want to dispute video and empirical evidence in favor of a political conspiracy. You can almost laugh when the conspiracy theorists desperately want to keep the Clinton administration out of the conspiracy.

So to assist everyone in determining who is who out here I posted this very simply little high school physics problem to see who was an expert at physics and who was not

So riddle me this batman;




the knife is balanced vertical upright, no mount.









thats where we left off.

wow the long dodge..

I expect you will forever dodge it.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Can't figure out where your errors are?

Pathetic for someone who is implying they "think" they know what they are talking about.

Why don't you ask your "troofer" brethren to help you out?

heard you the first time.

stop dodging, grow a pair, and take your best shot at inventing an error.

then its my turn.

waiting.

Inventing an error?



Does this mean you don't know where you screwed up? There are two glaring errors that you should see within your "fizix" question. What are they Mr. Mathematician?

Did you make that question up all by yourself?

still waiting for your expert spin

 

[Gamolon]

heard you the first time.

stop dodging, grow a pair, and take your best shot at inventing an error.

then its my turn.

waiting.

Inventing an error?



Does this mean you don't know where you screwed up? There are two glaring errors that you should see within your "fizix" question. What are they Mr. Mathematician?

Did you make that question up all by yourself?

still waiting for your expert spin

Is that it? SPIN?



Your own question has errors in it. It's a joke! Errors that you don't see because you have no clue about what you are talking about. Why don't you take your "fizix" question to some teachers. Maybe THEY can point you in the right direction.

The fact that you can't see them speaks VOLUMES.

Keep on running...

 

[Gamolon]

Hey Koko.

Can you explain why your OWN animated gif shows the plane wing snapping the pole in two WITHOUT shearing the wing?

You debunked your own claim?

How delicious!

 

[KokomoJojo]

Inventing an error?



Does this mean you don't know where you screwed up? There are two glaring errors that you should see within your "fizix" question. What are they Mr. Mathematician?

Did you make that question up all by yourself?

still waiting for your expert spin

Is that it? SPIN?



Your own question has errors in it. It's a joke! Errors that you don't see because you have no clue about what you are talking about. Why don't you take your "fizix" question to some teachers. Maybe THEY can point you in the right direction.

The fact that you can't see them speaks VOLUMES.

Keep on running...

everyone is on the edge of their seats

waiting

 

[KokomoJojo]

Hey Koko.

Can you explain why your OWN animated gif shows the plane wing snapping the pole in two WITHOUT shearing the wing?

You debunked your own claim?

How delicious!

what gif? you mean the dc7?
yeh I already explained that, apparently something so simplistic as that is too difficult for you is that it.

 

[daws101]

the knife is a balanced vertical upright, no mount.

geezus, try taking the stoopid hat off before posting in this thread k.

If you cant at least read one or 2 pages back so you have a fucking clue what is going on here.



you saw a tv show!



yeh troughers would have you believe this is true:









I posted a real plane but that doesnt seem to make any difference







So to assist everyone in determining who is who out here I posted this very simply little high school physics problem to see who was an expert at physics and who was not

So riddle me this batman;




the knife is balanced vertical upright, no mount.









thats where we left off.

wow the long dodge..

still clueless how the world works, you can stick your witnesses where the sun dont shine if what they seen does not match the material evidence.

the irony ...the irony..
you have no material evidence....

 

[daws101]

the knife is a balanced vertical upright, no mount.

geezus, try taking the stoopid hat off before posting in this thread k.

If you cant at least read one or 2 pages back so you have a fucking clue what is going on here.



you saw a tv show!



yeh troughers would have you believe this is true:









I posted a real plane but that doesnt seem to make any difference







So to assist everyone in determining who is who out here I posted this very simply little high school physics problem to see who was an expert at physics and who was not

So riddle me this batman;




the knife is balanced vertical upright, no mount.









thats where we left off.

wow the long dodge..

I expect you will forever dodge it.

nothing to dodge...you're not even asking the right questions...seem you can't state them correctly or you would.

 

[KokomoJojo]

wow the long dodge..

I expect you will forever dodge it.

nothing to dodge...you're not even asking the right questions...seem you can't state them correctly or you would.

more of the same from you!

what a fucking maroon

LMAO

 

[Gamolon]

so you really believe that a 400 pound pole hit at 500 mph that is snapped in 1/2 just bounced right on off the wing do ya?

When a teenee lil ole birdie goes right on through it at 1/2 the speed?

Do tell us what miracle applies then?

​

More contradictions from you? You don;t seem to keep track of the bullshit you keep spewing. Let's see. That teenie weenie little bird went right through the wing BETWEEN the engine and fuselage right?

So explain how, in your animated gif of the DC7, the wing snapped that pole in half and didn't shear?

again:

[/COLOR]

​

What a dope.

You keep debunking yourself!

 

[Gamolon]

I gave you pole data, you said you understood physics then tell us about how a 2.4 pound bird can go in one side out the other and a 400 pound pole just bounces off, unless you want to claim a plane did not go in.

Answer your own question dumbass. You posted PROOF that shows your understanding of physics, materials, and structural integrity are minimal at best.

That bird above hit between the engine and the fuselage. One of the poles in your animated gif also hits between the engine and the fuselage, but the wing snaps the pole in have yet does not shear off.

Please explain.

You're contradicting yourself in a BIG way.

 

[KokomoJojo]

so you really believe that a 400 pound pole hit at 500 mph that is snapped in 1/2 just bounced right on off the wing do ya?

When a teenee lil ole birdie goes right on through it at 1/2 the speed?

Do tell us what miracle applies then?

​

More contradictions from you? You don;t seem to keep track of the bullshit you keep spewing. Let's see. That teenie weenie little bird went right through the wing BETWEEN the engine and fuselage right?

So explain how, in your animated gif of the DC7, the wing snapped that pole in half and didn't shear?

again:

[/COLOR]

​

What a dope.

You keep debunking yourself!

stop blaming your inability to comprehend the meaning of simple sentences on to me.