ABikerSailor
Diamond Member
Were they disquialified from purchasing/ownership/posession by federal law?The second amendment does not limit the right to keep and bear arms only to some people.
So, in other words, you don't have a problem with people like Cho and Laughtner (who were proven to have mental problems) owning guns?
Due Process.How about convicted felons? Can they own guns too?
If people are as disturbed as Cho and Laughtner were, then no, they shouldn't be allowed to have guns, especially if they are found to be mentally deficient somehow by a certified psychologist.