A Democrat's Understanding Of The Constitution

[Derideo_Te]

Thank you for admitting that your home schooling failed to teach you basic reading comprehension and as such you have disqualified yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

Obvious projection. The emphasis you added to your support source servers only to emphasize your patent lack of reading comprehension.

You simply cannot refute my point, nor can you admit that your very own source validates my point while utterly failing to uphold yours.

You are clownshoes, Cupcake. Clown.Shoes.

You could not refute the regulations in the Militia Acts so instead you resort to spurious insults. That is a tacit admission of failure on your part.

Have a nice day.

Clown shoes.

As I said earlier...yes, "Regulate" in the sense of requiring that private citizens possess arms suitable for military use; that such arms are compatible with contemporary military equipment--not "regulate" in the restrictive statist anti-rights sense that superstitious gun-queers use the term.

As far as "register" is concerned... again, no bueno, Cupcake.

You are transparent in your strategy to conflate the meanings of the term "regulate" to suit your retarded notions of what the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights says.

Go play in the street.

the definition of regulation

noun
1.
a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority,especially to regulate conduct.

adjective
6.
prescribed by or conforming to regulation:

the definition of register

noun
1.
a book in which records of acts, events, names,etc., are kept.
2.
a list or record of such acts, events, etc.
3.
an entry in such a book, record, or list.
4.
an official document issued to a merchant ship asevidence of its nationality.
5.
registration or registry.

Cupcake, you remain Clown shoes.

More importantly for the comprehension-challenged, it is the militia that's to be well regulated, NOT the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

So, even if in some retard universe we're to be obligated to accepting your intellectually dishonest usage of the term "regulated", you're still misapplying the term in order satisfy your authority-hugging fetish.

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

 

[LOki]

Obvious projection. The emphasis you added to your support source servers only to emphasize your patent lack of reading comprehension.

You simply cannot refute my point, nor can you admit that your very own source validates my point while utterly failing to uphold yours.

You are clownshoes, Cupcake. Clown.Shoes.

You could not refute the regulations in the Militia Acts so instead you resort to spurious insults. That is a tacit admission of failure on your part.

Have a nice day.

Clown shoes.

As I said earlier...yes, "Regulate" in the sense of requiring that private citizens possess arms suitable for military use; that such arms are compatible with contemporary military equipment--not "regulate" in the restrictive statist anti-rights sense that superstitious gun-queers use the term.

As far as "register" is concerned... again, no bueno, Cupcake.

You are transparent in your strategy to conflate the meanings of the term "regulate" to suit your retarded notions of what the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights says.

Go play in the street.

the definition of regulation

noun
1.
a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority,especially to regulate conduct.

adjective
6.
prescribed by or conforming to regulation:

the definition of register

noun
1.
a book in which records of acts, events, names,etc., are kept.
2.
a list or record of such acts, events, etc.
3.
an entry in such a book, record, or list.
4.
an official document issued to a merchant ship asevidence of its nationality.
5.
registration or registry.

Cupcake, you remain Clown shoes.

More importantly for the comprehension-challenged, it is the militia that's to be well regulated, NOT the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

So, even if in some retard universe we're to be obligated to accepting your intellectually dishonest usage of the term "regulated", you're still misapplying the term in order satisfy your authority-hugging fetish.

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

 

[Derideo_Te]

You could not refute the regulations in the Militia Acts so instead you resort to spurious insults. That is a tacit admission of failure on your part.

Have a nice day.

Clown shoes.

As I said earlier...yes, "Regulate" in the sense of requiring that private citizens possess arms suitable for military use; that such arms are compatible with contemporary military equipment--not "regulate" in the restrictive statist anti-rights sense that superstitious gun-queers use the term.

As far as "register" is concerned... again, no bueno, Cupcake.

You are transparent in your strategy to conflate the meanings of the term "regulate" to suit your retarded notions of what the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights says.

Go play in the street.

the definition of regulation

noun
1.
a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority,especially to regulate conduct.

adjective
6.
prescribed by or conforming to regulation:

the definition of register

noun
1.
a book in which records of acts, events, names,etc., are kept.
2.
a list or record of such acts, events, etc.
3.
an entry in such a book, record, or list.
4.
an official document issued to a merchant ship asevidence of its nationality.
5.
registration or registry.

Cupcake, you remain Clown shoes.

More importantly for the comprehension-challenged, it is the militia that's to be well regulated, NOT the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

So, even if in some retard universe we're to be obligated to accepting your intellectually dishonest usage of the term "regulated", you're still misapplying the term in order satisfy your authority-hugging fetish.

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

 

[LOki]

Clown shoes.

As I said earlier...yes, "Regulate" in the sense of requiring that private citizens possess arms suitable for military use; that such arms are compatible with contemporary military equipment--not "regulate" in the restrictive statist anti-rights sense that superstitious gun-queers use the term.

As far as "register" is concerned... again, no bueno, Cupcake.

You are transparent in your strategy to conflate the meanings of the term "regulate" to suit your retarded notions of what the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights says.

Go play in the street.

the definition of regulation

noun
1.
a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority,especially to regulate conduct.

adjective
6.
prescribed by or conforming to regulation:

the definition of register

noun
1.
a book in which records of acts, events, names,etc., are kept.
2.
a list or record of such acts, events, etc.
3.
an entry in such a book, record, or list.
4.
an official document issued to a merchant ship asevidence of its nationality.
5.
registration or registry.

Cupcake, you remain Clown shoes.

More importantly for the comprehension-challenged, it is the militia that's to be well regulated, NOT the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

So, even if in some retard universe we're to be obligated to accepting your intellectually dishonest usage of the term "regulated", you're still misapplying the term in order satisfy your authority-hugging fetish.

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

View attachment 51299

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

 

[Derideo_Te]

the definition of regulation

noun
1.
a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority,especially to regulate conduct.

adjective
6.
prescribed by or conforming to regulation:

the definition of register

noun
1.
a book in which records of acts, events, names,etc., are kept.
2.
a list or record of such acts, events, etc.
3.
an entry in such a book, record, or list.
4.
an official document issued to a merchant ship asevidence of its nationality.
5.
registration or registry.

Cupcake, you remain Clown shoes.

More importantly for the comprehension-challenged, it is the militia that's to be well regulated, NOT the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

So, even if in some retard universe we're to be obligated to accepting your intellectually dishonest usage of the term "regulated", you're still misapplying the term in order satisfy your authority-hugging fetish.

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

View attachment 51299

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

 

[LOki]

Cupcake, you remain Clown shoes.

More importantly for the comprehension-challenged, it is the militia that's to be well regulated, NOT the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

So, even if in some retard universe we're to be obligated to accepting your intellectually dishonest usage of the term "regulated", you're still misapplying the term in order satisfy your authority-hugging fetish.

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

View attachment 51299

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

View attachment 51339
View attachment 51340

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

 

[Derideo_Te]

The entire world is wrong and only you know what those terms actually mean.

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

View attachment 51299

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

View attachment 51339
View attachment 51340

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 expose you as a liar.

 

[LOki]

No Cupcake, the world is correct--we all understand the meanings of words... you're just wrong.

View attachment 51299

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

View attachment 51339
View attachment 51340

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 expose you as a liar.

Only in your retarded universe, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 indict you. Sorry about your retarded luck.

 

[Derideo_Te]

View attachment 51299

The OP topic must be referring to you since you obviously lack comprehension across the board.

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

View attachment 51339
View attachment 51340

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 expose you as a liar.

Only in your retarded universe, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 indict you. Sorry about your retarded luck.

Ironic since they just exposed your rampant dishonesty yet again.

Since you are utterly incapable of making any meaningful contribution to the OP topic your subsequent drivel will be ignored.

Have a nice day.

 

[LOki]

Yet you cannot demonstrate with valid logic applied to verifiable facts of reality. Why is that, Cupcake?

Why do you insist upon denying the definition of "regulate" as it was used by the author of the 2nd Amendment in favor of the one you prefer? Is it that you cannot make any coherent point without such dishonesty?

Why is it you insist upon ignoring the OBVIOUS fact that the term "regulate" is not applied to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but rather to the militia? Are you just incompetent, or resolutely dishonest?

View attachment 51339
View attachment 51340

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 expose you as a liar.

Only in your retarded universe, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 indict you. Sorry about your retarded luck.

Ironic since they just exposed your rampant dishonesty yet again.

It's quite literally impossible that you've exposed any dishonesty on my part. You're obviously delusional... pathologically projecting your embarrassing character flaws upon others.

Since you are utterly incapable of making any meaningful contribution to the OP topic your subsequent drivel will be ignored.

I accept your resolute denial of reality as your admission of defeat.

Have a nice day.

Consider your capitulation accepted.

 

[Derideo_Te]

View attachment 51339
View attachment 51340

Since I have provided links and facts and you have provided nothing but mindless denials the onus is on you to prove your position.

So far you have failed to do so in every single response.

Therefore you have no credibility whatsoever.

Have a nice day.

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 expose you as a liar.

Only in your retarded universe, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 indict you. Sorry about your retarded luck.

Ironic since they just exposed your rampant dishonesty yet again.

It's quite literally impossible that you've exposed any dishonesty on my part. You're obviously delusional... pathologically projecting your embarrassing character flaws upon others.

Since you are utterly incapable of making any meaningful contribution to the OP topic your subsequent drivel will be ignored.

I accept your resolute denial of reality as your admission of defeat.

Have a nice day.

Consider your capitulation accepted.

Enjoy your long stay in Cyberia. Too bad that it is only a one way ticket.

 

[rightwinger]

The appalling ignorance of the gun fetishists is always readily apparent.

The Militia Acts of 1792 clearly regulated and registered guns belonging to We the People.

http://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm

It has always been and will always be within the powers of Congress to register and regulate firearms.

Funny. Nothing in there asserts any power of of Congress to register or regulate firearms.

Typical dishonesty of anti-rights statists to declare supremacy of powers over rights where none exists.

The Militia Acts of 1792 were Acts of Congress registering and regulating the firearms of private individuals.

That you cannot understand how Congress passes laws is not my problem.

I understand it precisely, Cupcake. Such registering and regulating the firearms of private individuals is not even mentioned.

The fact remains that the Militia Acts of 1792 were Acts of Congress that in no way were about the registering and regulating the firearms of private individuals.

Ask an adult to explain to you what the following means;

That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided,

and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes.

VI. And be it further enacted, That there shall be an adjutant general appointed in each state, whose duty it shall be to distribute all orders for the Commander in Chief of the State to the several corps; to attend all publick reviews, when the Commander in Chief of the State shall review the militia, or any part thereof; to obey all orders from him relative to carrying into execution, and perfecting, the system of military discipline established by this Act; to furnish blank forms of different returns that may be required; and to explain the principles of which they should be made; to receive from the several officers of the different corps throughout the state, returns of the militia under their command, reporting the actual situation of their arms, accoutrements, and ammunition, their delinquencies,

X. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the brigade inspector, to attend the regimental and battalion meeting of the militia composing their several brigades, during the time of their being under arms, to inspect their arms, ammunition and accoutrements; superintend their exercise and maneuvres and introduce the system of military discipline before described, throughout the brigade, agreeable to law, and such orders as they shall from time to time receive from the commander in Chief of the State; to make returns to the adjutant general of the state at least once in every year, of the militia of the brigade to which he belongs, reporting therein the actual situation of the arms, accoutrement, and ammunition, of the several corps,​

Right, as I've said earlier... "Regulate" in the sense of requiring that private citizens possess arms suitable for military use; that such arms are compatible with contemporary military equipment--not "regulate" in the restrictive statist anti-rights sense that superstitious gun-queers use the term.

As far as "register" is concerned... again, no bueno, Cupcake.

Sounds like a definition of unregulated

 

[LOki]

What are you talking about, Cupcake?

If you've actually provided such links, you'll be able to do so again.

The problem you're going to have to overcome is, you've posted your nonsense where the whole world is witness to the fact that no such links have been provided. No such links exist except in the retarded universe where only you decide the meaning of terms used by others.

Sorry about your retarded luck, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 expose you as a liar.

Only in your retarded universe, Cupcake.

Posts #63, #72 and #78 indict you. Sorry about your retarded luck.

Ironic since they just exposed your rampant dishonesty yet again.

It's quite literally impossible that you've exposed any dishonesty on my part. You're obviously delusional... pathologically projecting your embarrassing character flaws upon others.

Since you are utterly incapable of making any meaningful contribution to the OP topic your subsequent drivel will be ignored.

I accept your resolute denial of reality as your admission of defeat.

Have a nice day.

Consider your capitulation accepted.

Enjoy your long stay in Cyberia. Too bad that it is only a one way ticket.

View attachment 51378

View attachment 51379

The weather here just got awesome!

 

[Rustic]

How come more gun control is always called for by the weakest and most spineless of politicians?

 

[LOki]

How come more gun control is always called for by the weakest and most spineless of politicians?

 

[Rustic]

Same ol' story federal government crapping on its citizens to save them from themselves...

The "man" knows best... Taking and taking one freedom at a time, blood sucking leaches.

 

[rdean]

When Americans are shot dead, they say we need more guns.

When Americans die from lack of health care, Republicans say let them die.

When poor Americans can't get enough to eat, Republicans say cut their food stamps.

When did Republicans become Satan?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Funny. Nothing in there asserts any power of of Congress to register or regulate firearms.

Typical dishonesty of anti-rights statists to declare supremacy of powers over rights where none exists.

The Militia Acts of 1792 were Acts of Congress registering and regulating the firearms of private individuals.

That you cannot understand how Congress passes laws is not my problem.

I understand it precisely, Cupcake. Such registering and regulating the firearms of private individuals is not even mentioned.

The fact remains that the Militia Acts of 1792 were Acts of Congress that in no way were about the registering and regulating the firearms of private individuals.

Ask an adult to explain to you what the following means;

That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided,

and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes.

VI. And be it further enacted, That there shall be an adjutant general appointed in each state, whose duty it shall be to distribute all orders for the Commander in Chief of the State to the several corps; to attend all publick reviews, when the Commander in Chief of the State shall review the militia, or any part thereof; to obey all orders from him relative to carrying into execution, and perfecting, the system of military discipline established by this Act; to furnish blank forms of different returns that may be required; and to explain the principles of which they should be made; to receive from the several officers of the different corps throughout the state, returns of the militia under their command, reporting the actual situation of their arms, accoutrements, and ammunition, their delinquencies,

X. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the brigade inspector, to attend the regimental and battalion meeting of the militia composing their several brigades, during the time of their being under arms, to inspect their arms, ammunition and accoutrements; superintend their exercise and maneuvres and introduce the system of military discipline before described, throughout the brigade, agreeable to law, and such orders as they shall from time to time receive from the commander in Chief of the State; to make returns to the adjutant general of the state at least once in every year, of the militia of the brigade to which he belongs, reporting therein the actual situation of the arms, accoutrement, and ammunition, of the several corps,​

Right, as I've said earlier... "Regulate" in the sense of requiring that private citizens possess arms suitable for military use; that such arms are compatible with contemporary military equipment--not "regulate" in the restrictive statist anti-rights sense that superstitious gun-queers use the term.

As far as "register" is concerned... again, no bueno, Cupcake.

Sounds like a definition of unregulated

The idiots want to unregulate everything and do away with government. That is truly how fucking stupid they're.

 

[Rustic]

When Americans are shot dead, they say we need more guns.

When Americans die from lack of health care, Republicans say let them die.

When poor Americans can't get enough to eat, Republicans say cut their food stamps.

When did Republicans become Satan?

Cry me river...

 

[ScienceRocks]

How come more gun control is always called for by the weakest and most spineless of politicians?

If we didn't encourage so many guns we wouldn't have nearly as many mass shootings.