Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Now you are acting goofyActually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesPerhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
What we like to call.......the good ole days
You can keep trying to wear that mask, but it in no way fits. You people would have your noses securely Crazy-Glue'd to the King's anus just as you do Obama's.
Once again......your historical revisionism fails miserably
It was the conservatives who backed the crown. As usual they followed the money
At that time, you people were the conservatives. Playing shell games with word definitions doesn't change that.
Liberals were conservative and Conservatives were liberal
Thomas Jefferson was secretly a Tory.Now you are acting goofyActually, our founders used to tar and feather conservatives
What we like to call.......the good ole days
You can keep trying to wear that mask, but it in no way fits. You people would have your noses securely Crazy-Glue'd to the King's anus just as you do Obama's.
Once again......your historical revisionism fails miserably
It was the conservatives who backed the crown. As usual they followed the money
At that time, you people were the conservatives. Playing shell games with word definitions doesn't change that.
Liberals were conservative and Conservatives were liberal
Gosh, all those racist Democrats who ran for the Republican Party after the Civil Right Act vote in 1964.
It's a nice fantasy for you, but doesn't change the facts.
Big talk from a libtard trying to prove something that is wrong.Nonsense.It is the leftwingbats that don't understand the Constitution.Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
That is just a fallacy perpetrated by the NRA to dupe gun fetishists into purchasing more guns than they need.
/thread fail
Liberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
There most certainly is. Congress is constitutionally restricted to creating gun control legislation that does not infring upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms.Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
This is entirely nonsense. It's always some superstitious gun-queer that advances this notion that the NRA is lobbying arm for the firearms industry. Invariably they illegitimately reverse the cart and horse to make their point, but their dumb is transparent.That is just a fallacy perpetrated by the NRA to dupe gun fetishists into purchasing more guns than they need.
/thread fail
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
The militia is not requisite for the right.
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
The militia is not requisite for the right.
The Constitution recognizes the vital need for well regulated militias to defend the security of a free state
Registering guns and gun owners is well within the bounds of regulating a militia
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
The militia is not requisite for the right.
The Constitution recognizes the vital need for well regulated militias to defend the security of a free state
Registering guns and gun owners is well within the bounds of regulating a militia
And yet, the militia is not requisite for the right. Shall we keep pounding that in? Any chance it will stick?
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Why do you CONSISTANTLY ignore this part?
`the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
NOT the right of the militia, the right of the people.
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Why do you CONSISTANTLY ignore this part?
`the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
NOT the right of the militia, the right of the people.
I am talking about the well regulated militia
Nothing you have said and no court decision has struck down the right of the state to form well regulated militias. Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
The militia is not requisite for the right.
The Constitution recognizes the vital need for well regulated militias to defend the security of a free state
Registering guns and gun owners is well within the bounds of regulating a militia
And yet, the militia is not requisite for the right. Shall we keep pounding that in? Any chance it will stick?
According to Heller, it is not
But it does not negate the need for the state to form well regulated militias
Nothing in the Constitution prevents gun control.
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Why do you CONSISTANTLY ignore this part?
`the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
NOT the right of the militia, the right of the people.
I am talking about the well regulated militia
Nothing you have said and no court decision has struck down the right of the state to form well regulated militias. Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
no, they are not.
Males under the age of 16, older than 45, and all women were not eligible to be in the militia.
but they are part of the PEOPLE
"THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Why do you CONSISTANTLY ignore this part?
`the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
NOT the right of the militia, the right of the people.
I am talking about the well regulated militia
Nothing you have said and no court decision has struck down the right of the state to form well regulated militias. Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
no, they are not.
Males under the age of 16, older than 45, and all women were not eligible to be in the militia.
but they are part of the PEOPLE
You obviously do not understand what well regulated is
How can we regulate our militias if we do not know who has guns and what type of gun they have?
Seems obvious
Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
That is just a fallacy perpetrated by the NRA to dupe gun fetishists into purchasing more guns than they need.
/thread fail
"A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state"
Demands gun control. How can we maintain a well regulated militia without knowing who has guns and what kind of guns they have?
Why do you CONSISTANTLY ignore this part?
`the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
NOT the right of the militia, the right of the people.
I am talking about the well regulated militia
Nothing you have said and no court decision has struck down the right of the state to form well regulated militias. Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
no, they are not.
Males under the age of 16, older than 45, and all women were not eligible to be in the militia.
but they are part of the PEOPLE
You obviously do not understand what well regulated is
How can we regulate our militias if we do not know who has guns and what type of gun they have?
Seems obvious
"Well regulated"
MEN between the ages of 16-45.
NO males UNDER the age of 16, NO males OVER the age of 45.
NO females
Even in those days, you didn't have to belong to a militia to own a firearm.
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Why do you CONSISTANTLY ignore this part?
`the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
NOT the right of the militia, the right of the people.
I am talking about the well regulated militia
Nothing you have said and no court decision has struck down the right of the state to form well regulated militias. Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
Gun and owner registration are all part of a well regulated militia
no, they are not.
Males under the age of 16, older than 45, and all women were not eligible to be in the militia.
but they are part of the PEOPLE
You obviously do not understand what well regulated is
How can we regulate our militias if we do not know who has guns and what type of gun they have?
Seems obvious
"Well regulated"
MEN between the ages of 16-45.
NO males UNDER the age of 16, NO males OVER the age of 45.
NO females
Even in those days, you didn't have to belong to a militia to own a firearm.
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
But you had to own a firearm to belong to the militia. They had to kinow who was armed and what type of weapon they had
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
But you had to own a firearm to belong to the militia.
They had to know who was armed and what type of weapon they had
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
