Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No. it is in fact correct.Wrong"A Democrat's Understanding Of The Constitution"
...is the correct and accurate understanding of the Constitution until the Supreme Court rules otherwise.
From today's Washington Post
Cue Laff-Trak:
In eulogy, Cuomo calls for national gun control: New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) renewed his call for national gun control legislation Saturday when he delivered a eulogy for a state attorney who was fatally wounded by a stray bullet in Brooklyn earlier this month.
Nonsense.It is the leftwingbats that don't understand the Constitution.Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
That is just a fallacy perpetrated by the NRA to dupe gun fetishists into purchasing more guns than they need.
/thread fail
I actually agree concealed carry should be like a drivers license and recognized across state linesactually based on recent supreme court twistings of the constitution, if some states recognizes the right to carry, then all states must recognize the right to carry.Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
That is just a fallacy perpetrated by the NRA to dupe gun fetishists into purchasing more guns than they need.
/thread fail
Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
This fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy.someone gets shot in a city with some of the tightest gun control in the country,
and he thinks gun control will work nationwide?
Liberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
This fails as a confusion of correlation and causation fallacy.someone gets shot in a city with some of the tightest gun control in the country,
and he thinks gun control will work nationwide?
It seems the Dems here are running around like proverbial headless chickens.
Our founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
Liberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Our founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
Liberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Our founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
Liberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Actually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesOur founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
Liberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Perhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights? What does it do?
Actually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesOur founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
Liberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Perhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
What we like to call.......the good ole days
Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights? What does it do?
Why don't you enroll in your local community college for adult remedial social studies and learn for yourself since your home schooling obviously failed to teach you the basics.
Actually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesOur founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals perfectly understand the Constitution because they acknowledge and respect the Constitution and its case law, and correctly understand that the Constitution exists solely in the context of that case law, as determined by the Supreme Court, in accordance with the original intent and understanding of the Framing Generation.
Liberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Perhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
What we like to call.......the good ole days
You can keep trying to wear that mask, but it in no way fits. You people would have your noses securely Crazy-Glue'd to the King's anus just as you do Obama's.
Actually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesOur founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but ToriesLiberals by classic definition? Yes, as the Founding Fathers who composed it.
Our modern misnamed "liberal" Progressives? Not even close. They detest the thing as the primary obstacle in the way of their intent to "fundamentally change the United States of America", and undermine it by increment every chance they get.
Perhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
What we like to call.......the good ole days
You can keep trying to wear that mask, but it in no way fits. You people would have your noses securely Crazy-Glue'd to the King's anus just as you do Obama's.
Once again......your historical revisionism fails miserably
It was the conservatives who backed the crown. As usual they followed the money
Typical gun fetishist OP's ignorance of the Constitution.
There is no constitutional restriction on national gun control legislation.
What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights? What does it do?
Why don't you enroll in your local community college for adult remedial social studies and learn for yourself since your home schooling obviously failed to teach you the basics.
TRANSLATION: "I cannot tell you what is it is or what it does because I myself have not been told those things by my usual sheepherders. Hence no answer, save a nonsensical attempt at humor."
I was not home schooled. Catholic education. First the nuns, then the Franciscans, then the Jesuits.
Actually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesOur founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but Tories
Perhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
What we like to call.......the good ole days
You can keep trying to wear that mask, but it in no way fits. You people would have your noses securely Crazy-Glue'd to the King's anus just as you do Obama's.
Once again......your historical revisionism fails miserably
It was the conservatives who backed the crown. As usual they followed the money
At that time, you people were the conservatives. Playing shell games with word definitions doesn't change that.
Now you are acting goofyActually, our founders used to tar and feather conservativesOur founding fathers would be repulsed by today's conservatives .....nothing but Tories
Perhaps, but they would line up the Democrats and shoot them as traitors.
What we like to call.......the good ole days
You can keep trying to wear that mask, but it in no way fits. You people would have your noses securely Crazy-Glue'd to the King's anus just as you do Obama's.
Once again......your historical revisionism fails miserably
It was the conservatives who backed the crown. As usual they followed the money
At that time, you people were the conservatives. Playing shell games with word definitions doesn't change that.
