A Feminist's Master Plan for World Revolution - Imprison All The Men

[ChrisL]

Well if you still feel that way about women, what does that say about your 2nd wife? Will you be moving on to wife #3 soon? And I see that you lay ALL the blame at the ex-wife's feet. That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.

To understand my ex is to understand her father.

Don't go there.

I've seen the face of evil in both him and his daughter.

Today I'm where I belong. And this is where I will stay to the end of my days.

Well you brought it up.

Do shut the fuck up.

Come on, let's fight. I'm ready.

I've gone through a shit-load of pain in my life. Don't fuck with me.

Good grief! Do you think you are the ONLY one with a sad story? I'm only joking. Lighten up Francis.

 

[WinterBorn]

It's always scary to peek into the dreams of feminists. Go here if you're brave enough, or curious enough, to see how they and their cat-mates plan world domination:

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle. . . .

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities. . .

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.
​

Go read the manifesto. Long Live The Revolution!

​

And this concerns you? Lol.

White single women are enthusiastic supporters of Democrats, at odds with every other white demographic. Something odd is going on. The Zombie Apocalypse has to start somewhere!!!!

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

 

[Rikurzhen]

That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.

Battered women deserved it???

Don't know what you're talking about.

Sorry about that, I appear to have edited too severely. Here's the full text of your remark:

And I see that you lay ALL the blame at the ex-wife's feet. That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.
​

Battered women tend to lay ALL the blame at the feet of their husband. Is it wrong for them to do so?

 

[ChrisL]

It's always scary to peek into the dreams of feminists. Go here if you're brave enough, or curious enough, to see how they and their cat-mates plan world domination:

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle. . . .

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities. . .

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.
​

Go read the manifesto. Long Live The Revolution!

​

And this concerns you? Lol.

White single women are enthusiastic supporters of Democrats, at odds with every other white demographic. Something odd is going on. The Zombie Apocalypse has to start somewhere!!!!

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

I clicked on it too. I don't get it either.

 

[Mr. H.]

To understand my ex is to understand her father.

Don't go there.

I've seen the face of evil in both him and his daughter.

Today I'm where I belong. And this is where I will stay to the end of my days.

Well you brought it up.

Do shut the fuck up.

Come on, let's fight. I'm ready.

I've gone through a shit-load of pain in my life. Don't fuck with me.

Good grief! Do you think you are the ONLY one with a sad story? I'm only joking. Lighten up Francis.

Don't call me Francis, surely.

 

[ChrisL]

That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.

Battered women deserved it???

Don't know what you're talking about.

Sorry about that, I appear to have edited too severely. Here's the full text of your remark:

And I see that you lay ALL the blame at the ex-wife's feet. That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.
​

Battered women tend to lay ALL the blame at the feet of their husband. Is it wrong for them to do so?

Where does he say he was "battered?" Jump to conclusions much? "Abusive" does not necessarily mean "battered." It can mean that she called him mean names. Some people consider that abusive.

 

[Rikurzhen]

It's always scary to peek into the dreams of feminists. Go here if you're brave enough, or curious enough, to see how they and their cat-mates plan world domination:

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle. . . .

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities. . .

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.
​

Go read the manifesto. Long Live The Revolution!

​

And this concerns you? Lol.

White single women are enthusiastic supporters of Democrats, at odds with every other white demographic. Something odd is going on. The Zombie Apocalypse has to start somewhere!!!!

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

That's odd, I just clicked the link and it took me directly to the comment I linked to.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Well you brought it up.

Do shut the fuck up.

Come on, let's fight. I'm ready.

I've gone through a shit-load of pain in my life. Don't fuck with me.

Good grief! Do you think you are the ONLY one with a sad story? I'm only joking. Lighten up Francis.

Don't call me Francis, surely.

Don't call her Shirley.

 

[ChrisL]

Well you brought it up.

Do shut the fuck up.

Come on, let's fight. I'm ready.

I've gone through a shit-load of pain in my life. Don't fuck with me.

Good grief! Do you think you are the ONLY one with a sad story? I'm only joking. Lighten up Francis.

Don't call me Francis, surely.

That's Shirley to you! Seriously though, I didn't mean to offend you. However, I did take issue with your remarks about "women" when you should have said "some women." Just like some men, some women are assholes, but not ALL women.

 

[ChrisL]

And this concerns you? Lol.

White single women are enthusiastic supporters of Democrats, at odds with every other white demographic. Something odd is going on. The Zombie Apocalypse has to start somewhere!!!!

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

That's odd, I just clicked the link and it took me directly to the comment I linked to.

It took me to a post by a poster named Candy Corn that had nothing to do with this topic as far as I could tell. What's the connection? Just TELL us.

 

[Rikurzhen]

White single women are enthusiastic supporters of Democrats, at odds with every other white demographic. Something odd is going on. The Zombie Apocalypse has to start somewhere!!!!

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

That's odd, I just clicked the link and it took me directly to the comment I linked to.

It took me to a post by a poster named Candy Corn that had nothing to do with this topic as far as I could tell. What's the connection? Just TELL us.

Comment #112. I wonder why the link takes me there but you guys got the first page?

Yet in a measure of the party's vulnerability, even that advantage rests on an unsteady foundation: National Pew Research Center and ABC/Washington Post polls conducted in October found that college-educated white women, though strongly preferring Democrats on issues relating to women's health, actually trust Republicans more on both managing the economy and safeguarding the nation's security.​

 

[ChrisL]

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

That's odd, I just clicked the link and it took me directly to the comment I linked to.

It took me to a post by a poster named Candy Corn that had nothing to do with this topic as far as I could tell. What's the connection? Just TELL us.

Comment #112. I wonder why the link takes me there but you guys got the first page?

Yet in a measure of the party's vulnerability, even that advantage rests on an unsteady foundation: National Pew Research Center and ABC/Washington Post polls conducted in October found that college-educated white women, though strongly preferring Democrats on issues relating to women's health, actually trust Republicans more on both managing the economy and safeguarding the nation's security.​

It probably depends on how you have your pages set up, and which windows program you use, etc. I'll go look again.

 

[WinterBorn]

That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.

Battered women deserved it???

Don't know what you're talking about.

Sorry about that, I appear to have edited too severely. Here's the full text of your remark:

And I see that you lay ALL the blame at the ex-wife's feet. That's interesting, because a relationship normally involves TWO people.
​

Battered women tend to lay ALL the blame at the feet of their husband. Is it wrong for them to do so?

If the husband hits his wife, then yes, he has all the blame. If she hits him, she has all the blame.

I've known too many battered wives who walked on eggshells waiting for their husband to explode. If he is beating her, he is to blame.

 

[bodecea]

I have seen the videos from this nutball. But I think she represents mainstream feminists about like Westboro Baptist represents mainstream Christianity.

Exactly.

 

[ChrisL]

Perhaps they don't pay attention to any "white demographic", but want someone in office who will listen to their voices. The Republicans have catered to old white men and christian fundamentalists, to the exclusion of virtually every other group. So those other groups stopped waiting to be noticed.

Background information here.

The link went to a page of posts on this forum. No idea what it was supposed to mean.

That's odd, I just clicked the link and it took me directly to the comment I linked to.

It took me to a post by a poster named Candy Corn that had nothing to do with this topic as far as I could tell. What's the connection? Just TELL us.

Comment #112. I wonder why the link takes me there but you guys got the first page?

Yet in a measure of the party's vulnerability, even that advantage rests on an unsteady foundation: National Pew Research Center and ABC/Washington Post polls conducted in October found that college-educated white women, though strongly preferring Democrats on issues relating to women's health, actually trust Republicans more on both managing the economy and safeguarding the nation's security.​

Well, I still don't see how any of that relates to your OP about feminist women "taking over the world." Lol.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Women are bat-shit crazy. If it weren't for the moon, they would have no menstrual cycle.

But put a group of them in the same room for a couple months, and they eventually bleed on the same day.

My sister is the only female I've ever known that absolutely hates women. She knows herself and sees herself for what she is. Vindictive, vengeful, acerbic, and without mercy to the male population. Cold, calculating, retributive, and just plain mean.

With or without words, women can and will bring men to their feet.

But you just gotta love their naughty bits.

My wife cannot stand women either. She sees it at work.
They are catty. Jealous. Self entitled. Always looking for short cuts to success. Use their kids as a weapon against their husbands and use them as an excuse to get out of work.
I would HATE to be single right now. The typical female who is single and over 30 has desperation on her mind. They are extremely high maintenance and even more demanding. They are always looking for the guy who will set them up financially.
The guy could be a total jerk, but if he's got money and a decent career, he's fair game. But AH HA.....That's not the whole plan. Lately, these same women already have an exit strategy. After having a couple kids, getting them through infancy and their first few years of school, they sue their husbands for divorce. Get the house and half of his net worth.
And they soon take off in pursuit of their next victim. \
No, I'm not a misogynist. Women in general are better company than guys. As friends only though.
All through my 20's and 30's I had more female friends than male friends. Of course we shared similar interests. Which kind of friends don't?

 

[thereisnospoon]

I have seen the videos from this nutball. But I think she represents mainstream feminists about like Westboro Baptist represents mainstream Christianity.

Yeah...This is a real out there fringe type. She's trying for what will be about 15 seconds of fame.

 

[WinterBorn]

Women are bat-shit crazy. If it weren't for the moon, they would have no menstrual cycle.

But put a group of them in the same room for a couple months, and they eventually bleed on the same day.

My sister is the only female I've ever known that absolutely hates women. She knows herself and sees herself for what she is. Vindictive, vengeful, acerbic, and without mercy to the male population. Cold, calculating, retributive, and just plain mean.

With or without words, women can and will bring men to their feet.

But you just gotta love their naughty bits.

My wife cannot stand women either. She sees it at work.
They are catty. Jealous. Self entitled. Always looking for short cuts to success. Use their kids as a weapon against their husbands and use them as an excuse to get out of work.
I would HATE to be single right now. The typical female who is single and over 30 has desperation on her mind. They are extremely high maintenance and even more demanding. They are always looking for the guy who will set them up financially.
The guy could be a total jerk, but if he's got money and a decent career, he's fair game. But AH HA.....That's not the whole plan. Lately, these same women already have an exit strategy. After having a couple kids, getting them through infancy and their first few years of school, they sue their husbands for divorce. Get the house and half of his net worth.
And they soon take off in pursuit of their next victim. \
No, I'm not a misogynist. Women in general are better company than guys. As friends only though.
All through my 20's and 30's I had more female friends than male friends. Of course we shared similar interests. Which kind of friends don't?

I am 54 years old and I find women to be wonderful. Yes, there are the catty drama queens. Just like there are the competitive jerks in the male gender. But I don't see them as the majority in either sex.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Women are bat-shit crazy. If it weren't for the moon, they would have no menstrual cycle.

But put a group of them in the same room for a couple months, and they eventually bleed on the same day.

My sister is the only female I've ever known that absolutely hates women. She knows herself and sees herself for what she is. Vindictive, vengeful, acerbic, and without mercy to the male population. Cold, calculating, retributive, and just plain mean.

With or without words, women can and will bring men to their feet.

But you just gotta love their naughty bits.

Yikes! Someone seems a little bitter! Lol.

I spent 13 years of my young life married to a verbally, emotionally, and mentally abusive woman. And our three children summarily suffered.

Bitter? Not really. Sorry? Yes, for her. And for our children. But the four of us turned out better than ok.

She moved on to re-marry, as did I. And she continues to to abuse. And I continue to... amuse.

My sister is an emasculating witch. She lorded over her first husband as though she were the strictest of parents. She was up his ass about everything. If the weather was shitty, she'd bitch at him. She liked to spend money. Money she and her husband did not have. She psent it anyway. Drove then into tremendous debt. 25 years later, she is still not fully out of the woods.
He ended up leaving her because he just could not take any more shit from her.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Rik that woman is NUTS , but a minority, surely you agree.

I bet a million dollars she goes ape shit anytime someone suggests doing similar with Muslims though.