Eaglewings
Platinum Member
Vast-ectomy is still in denial that the trolls even did anything, and calling the Dems snowflakes because Clinton lost from a year ago..First point - Mueller has just laid out, chapter and verse, who did what. I don't see how that is supposed to be read as "mistakes." I suppose you could be saying that the FBI has just been sitting at their desks making this shit up and taking names out of the Moscow phonebook, but I don't believe that. You can if you want.Thanks for telling me who I trust. It's so helpful.I already told you, I believe the intelligence agencies that say this is well beyond anything they've done before and I don't take kindly to their hacking and then leaking the information out during the campaign. If Russia has done anything like this before, I didn't hear about it. I doubt if you have either.It still is theft. Of money, investigating what we already know. You keep shifting the focus of the topic. It’s at that point you should rethink the basis of your position. It’s only difficult if your a partisan hack...
You don't believe the intelligence agencies and you seem to think this is SOP since 1945. We disagree.
When the intelligence agencies haven't actually been allowed to examine the DNC server and are basing their opinion purely on the word of a political party, then yes, I find their opinion to be dubious.
Just like you found the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq story to be dubious. Don't go born-again-CIA-worshipper just because the guys currently in the crosshairs of the intelligence machine is someone you don't like, you know good and God damn well that you don't trust those shit heads either.
Fair enough, but my main three points remain.
First point - The intelligence community has both been wrong before and completely bullshitted the American people before.
Second point - The DNC never turned over the server to the FBI. The intelligence consensus is based entirely on the say-so of the DNC
Third point - The DNC just rigged their own primary. Their integrity is hardly beyond reproach.
Thus, when I assumed you were being insincere to support your political argument, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. The alternative is that you're sincerely explaining that you have faith in the word of proven liars based on the word of proven liars.
Second point--the FBI received an exact copy of the servers in question which fulfilled their requirements. Exact copy. This is a total nonpoint.
Third point--I find it terribly amusing that Dems are expected to flock to the Trump tent -- because Dems lie and none of that happens in the WH? LMFAO
Better arguments than Vastator, though, I'll give you that.
It hard for some to get there stick out of the mud.
Don't waste your time.
Sent from my XT1575 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app