TakeAStepBack
Gold Member
- Mar 29, 2011
- 13,935
- 1,742
- 245
What free market system?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What free market system?
"Private ownership of the media" today means that only 7 massive corporations (two of which aren't even American) produce 80% of news, radio, television, movies, books, magazines, billboards, advertisements, and all other forms of mindless commercialistic gibberish that the American people see, hear and read on a daily basis.
7 corporations (Time-Warner, Disney, Viacom, News Corp, Bertlesmann, and Comcast/GE) produce 80% of American media. That is not Progressive. They are 1% billionaires who do not care about you. They feed you shit and tell you that it's delicious.
That's called FOX News and any other corporate-owned media. "Once corporate news convinces the easily led that they are simply looking out for you.... it's all over."Once they convince the easily led that they are simply looking out for you....
...it's all over.
Good news. The internet is a place for free exchange of thoughts and ideas, as well as for commerce. The internet extends far beyond American borders. You can't regulate something the whole world uses on a daily basis.
Courts strikes down the liberal misery known as Net Neutrality and they demand probable cause for digital content at borders. Who knows - maybe next they won't allow Obama to act like a dictator and bypass Congress!
U.S. appeals court strikes down FCC net neutrality rules | Reuters
Courts rule Reasonable Cause required for digital content | Computerworld
Rotty's correct...it was a good week for rights.
Oklahomas Ban on Gay Marriage Is Unconstitutional, Judge Rules
As we've already covered SW, gays have enjoyed every right that straights have since the begging of the U.S. They enjoyed free speech, right to bear arms, protection against seizure, and 100% of all other rights.
But, like all homosexuals and liberals, you believe you are special and entitled to more than the "little" people who are "beneath" you.
Now here is an idea - why don't you dodge that question again about how you plan to discriminate against (and I quote) "consenting adults" which happen to be muslim and want 17 wives. And I forget, what was your plan again when the muslim makes the claim that an employee not providing free healthcare for all 17 of those wives is "discrimination"? Yeah - ole [MENTION=24452]Seawytch[/MENTION] never wants to discuss these realities. Because she's smart enough to realize it exposes her as a deplorable hypocrite. She always ends with the evasive and nonsensical "I wish them luck".
"We already have the freest internet in the world" You'll have to say "had the freest internet in the world" if the principles of net neutrality are lost. I'd try to educate you on the subject but obviously your thick skull is already crammed to overflowing with fatuous Beckisms. One thing I can assure you if Verizon and their ilk have their way a lowly website like this won't survive the dollar driven bandwidth allotment.
It's all about the money. Basically, people have been getting smart, ditching their cable, signing up to Netflix. The same ISP's that carry cable and Netflix see themselves getting cut out of the action and want a piece of the pie.
You should really chill. The only regulations that are in place are to guarantee equal access. Tell me what is so terrible about that?"Private ownership of the media" today means that only 7 massive corporations (two of which aren't even American) produce 80% of news, radio, television, movies, books, magazines, billboards, advertisements, and all other forms of mindless commercialistic gibberish that the American people see, hear and read on a daily basis.
7 corporations (Time-Warner, Disney, Viacom, News Corp, Bertlesmann, and Comcast/GE) produce 80% of American media. That is not Progressive. They are 1% billionaires who do not care about you. They feed you shit and tell you that it's delicious.
If there are any others who believe that the excuses/explanations for 'regulating' the internet, consider this: the claims that would be used to ensure privacy, or protection of the citizenry are far outweighed by the massive potential for abuse.
Should that be a concept that any need mull over....look closely as the thug tactic employed by the current Leftist administration in using the Internal Revenue Service to stultify the activity of those organizations they felt might be antithetical to their machinations.
"IRS employees were acutely aware in 2010 that President Obama wanted to crack down on conservative organizations and were egged into targeting tea party groups by press reports mocking the emerging movement, according to an interim report being circulated Tuesday by House investigators."
: IRS officials thought Obama wanted crackdown on tea party groups, worried about negative press - Washington Times
Once they convince the easily led that they are simply looking out for you....
...it's all over.
"We already have the freest internet in the world" You'll have to say "had the freest internet in the world" if the principles of net neutrality are lost. I'd try to educate you on the subject but obviously your thick skull is already crammed to overflowing with fatuous Beckisms. One thing I can assure you if Verizon and their ilk have their way a lowly website like this won't survive the dollar driven bandwidth allotment.
Good news. The internet is a place for free exchange of thoughts and ideas, as well as for commerce. The internet extends far beyond American borders. You can't regulate something the whole world uses on a daily basis.
Huh? Why do you label Net Neutrality a "liberal misery"? You would prefer an internet commercialized like cable tv? The web has been revolutionary as a medium for the democratization of knowledge and information because it has been open and mostly unfettered. You like China's model better?
What an absolutely absurd thing to say. It always amazes me how ignorant and completely uninformed Dumbocrats are on a topic, yet their willingness to weigh in on that topic anyway.
We already have the freest internet in the world. It is not censored in any way like China and Iran. It is not blocked in any way like China and Iran. So what "problem" exists that Net Neutrality is addressing?
Net Neutrality is trying to implement China's model. Yet, you are so ignorant of what Net Neutrality actually is, you're supporting exactly what you're against (typical fuck'n moron Dumbocrat).