Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What liberal has apologized for acts of terrorism?
Must I teach you the English language, as well as politics, history, economics, ethics,...and life????
Egad!
a·pol·o·gist
əˈpäləjəst/
noun
a person who defends or supports something (such as a religion, cause, or organization) that is being criticized or attacked by other people
- a person who offers an argument in defense of something controversial.
"an enthusiastic apologist for fascism in the 1920s"
synonyms: defender, supporter, upholder, advocate, proponent, exponent,propagandist, champion, campaigner;
informalcheerleader
"one of Eisenhower's better-known apologists"
Definition of APOLOGIST
From the OP:
c. And this is the sort of response one can expect from the boilerplate Leftists:
"I work with them as a job, I get to see first hand what suffering they have endured, what horrors they have fled and iy highlights what heartless and evil c*nts the people who bang on about them being a swarm of terrorists actually are." The Irish... And Who Didn't 'Help' Them Succeed
The question was, who are the Liberal apologists for the terrorism?
You didn't name any.
The following is obvious to those who think, and who learn....
9. "Another point, obvious but inconvenient, is that Islam is not a religion of peace. There are ways of interpreting Islam that could make it something other than a call to war. But even these benign constructions do not make it a call to peace. Verses such as “Fight those who believe not in Allah,” and “Fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war,” are not peaceful injunctions, no matter how one contextualizes.
Although this came as a revelation to me, it should not have. After all, it is not as if Western civilization had no experience dealing with Islamic supremacism—what today we call “Islamist” ideology, the belief that sharia must govern society." Islam—Facts or Dreams?
10. For substantiation, consider the importance of Saudi Arabia....the keeper of the holiest sites in Islam, the destination of the Hajj for all devout Muslims.
Take a good look at the Saudi flag:
Is that a dove you see at the bottom?
Straw man fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy - more ignorance, fear, and bigotry from the right.1. Without fail, no matter how horrific the savagery, there will be a Lemming-like horde of Liberals fighting to be the first to apologize for and excuse the crime.
This sort of crime:
a. Tashfeen Malik and Syed Rizwan Farook, are among the immigrants welcomed with open arms by the gracious folks of America....they were given a baby shower by his fellow workers, and, so, they returned with automatic weapons and slaughtered those very same workers at a Christmas party.
and this....
b. In Pakistan yesterday, at a peaceful Christian Easter celebration..."Twenty nine children among 72 killed as Taliban suicide bomber blows himself up next to SWINGS at a park in Pakistan... a splinter group affiliated with the Pakistani Taliban, has claimed responsibility for the attack, adding: 'The target was Christians.' "
Mothers and children among 70 killed in suicide bombing in Pakistan
c. And this is the sort of response one can expect from the boilerplate Leftists:
"I work with them as a job, I get to see first hand what suffering they have endured, what horrors they have fled and iy highlights what heartless and evil c*nts the people who bang on about them being a swarm of terrorists actually are." The Irish... And Who Didn't 'Help' Them Succeed
2. Somehow, the mental disease known as either Liberalism, or political correctness, demands that everyone ignore the existential danger that Islam represents. That's right....mainstream Islam.
a." In truth, even a tiny minority of "1%" of Muslims worldwide translates to 15 million believers - which is hardly an insignificant number. However, the "minority" of Muslims who approve of terrorists, their goals, or their means of achieving them is much greater than this. In fact, it isn't even a true minority in some cases, depending on how goals and targets are defined. Muslim Opinion Polls
3. Andrew McCarthy penned the following revelation about Islam, while clarifying the difference between Islam and Muslims. For 18 years, he was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York, and from 1993-95 he led the terrorism prosecution against Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, and his expertise in this area cannot be denied.....
...but it will be, by those with the above mentioned mental condition.
The subject of McCarthy's prosecution was the terror cell of Omar Abdel Rahman, infamously known as the Blind Sheikh,that had bombed the World Trade Center and was plotting an even more devastating strike—simultaneous attacks on the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, the United Nations complex on the East River, and the FBI’s lower Manhattan headquarters.
At the start of the trial, McCarty was convinced of what Liberals still believe: "we should read nothing into the fact that all the men in this terrorist cell were Muslims; that their actions were not representative of any religion or belief system; and that to the extent they were explaining their atrocities by citing Islamic scripture, they were twisting and perverting one of the world’s great religions, a religion that encourages peace."
Islam—Facts or Dreams?
How and why he changed his opinion....the story will follow.
Straw man fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy - more ignorance, fear, and bigotry from the right.1. Without fail, no matter how horrific the savagery, there will be a Lemming-like horde of Liberals fighting to be the first to apologize for and excuse the crime.
This sort of crime:
a. Tashfeen Malik and Syed Rizwan Farook, are among the immigrants welcomed with open arms by the gracious folks of America....they were given a baby shower by his fellow workers, and, so, they returned with automatic weapons and slaughtered those very same workers at a Christmas party.
and this....
b. In Pakistan yesterday, at a peaceful Christian Easter celebration..."Twenty nine children among 72 killed as Taliban suicide bomber blows himself up next to SWINGS at a park in Pakistan... a splinter group affiliated with the Pakistani Taliban, has claimed responsibility for the attack, adding: 'The target was Christians.' "
Mothers and children among 70 killed in suicide bombing in Pakistan
c. And this is the sort of response one can expect from the boilerplate Leftists:
"I work with them as a job, I get to see first hand what suffering they have endured, what horrors they have fled and iy highlights what heartless and evil c*nts the people who bang on about them being a swarm of terrorists actually are." The Irish... And Who Didn't 'Help' Them Succeed
2. Somehow, the mental disease known as either Liberalism, or political correctness, demands that everyone ignore the existential danger that Islam represents. That's right....mainstream Islam.
a." In truth, even a tiny minority of "1%" of Muslims worldwide translates to 15 million believers - which is hardly an insignificant number. However, the "minority" of Muslims who approve of terrorists, their goals, or their means of achieving them is much greater than this. In fact, it isn't even a true minority in some cases, depending on how goals and targets are defined. Muslim Opinion Polls
3. Andrew McCarthy penned the following revelation about Islam, while clarifying the difference between Islam and Muslims. For 18 years, he was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York, and from 1993-95 he led the terrorism prosecution against Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, and his expertise in this area cannot be denied.....
...but it will be, by those with the above mentioned mental condition.
The subject of McCarthy's prosecution was the terror cell of Omar Abdel Rahman, infamously known as the Blind Sheikh,that had bombed the World Trade Center and was plotting an even more devastating strike—simultaneous attacks on the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, the United Nations complex on the East River, and the FBI’s lower Manhattan headquarters.
At the start of the trial, McCarty was convinced of what Liberals still believe: "we should read nothing into the fact that all the men in this terrorist cell were Muslims; that their actions were not representative of any religion or belief system; and that to the extent they were explaining their atrocities by citing Islamic scripture, they were twisting and perverting one of the world’s great religions, a religion that encourages peace."
Islam—Facts or Dreams?
How and why he changed his opinion....the story will follow.
At the start of the trial, McCarty was convinced of what Liberals still believe: "we should read nothing into the fact that all the men in this terrorist cell were Muslims; that their actions were not representative of any religion or belief system; and that to the extent they were explaining their atrocities by citing Islamic scripture, they were twisting and perverting one of the world’s great religions, a religion that encourages peace."
Islam—Facts or Dreams?
.
What president since the amnesty maker Reagan has the US ever not had an open border policy?
Having received their marching orders from the dunce in the White House, Lock-Step Liberals are ready and willing to give up their and our right to survival, and freedom. "Defend the sociopaths in Islam" Obama says....and they repeat..."It shall be done!"
7. Now for the bad news....especially for those apologists who rely on some imagined view that only a "few" Muslims support the terrorists....
....even Muslims who are not orthodox or fundamentalist pose a problem, as they inherently support those who are. We saw that in Brussels, when whole Muslim communities rallied around the savages who blew up innocents in the airport and subway terminal....
"Missiles thrown at police in Molenbeek by Salah Abdeslam 'supporters' - their sick 'HERO'" Missiles thrown at police in Molenbeek by Salah Abdeslam 'supporters' - their sick 'HERO'
8. This is the terrible truth that McCarthy learned at the blind Sheikh's trial...
"Another disturbing aspect of the trial against the Blind Sheikh and his fellow jihadists was the character witnesses who testified for the defense. Most of these people were moderate, peaceful Muslim Americans who would no more commit terrorist acts than the rest of us. But when questions about Islamic doctrine would come up—“What does jihad mean?” “What is sharia?” “How might sharia apply to a certain situation?”—these moderate, peaceful Muslims explained that they were not competent to say. In other words, for the answers, you’d have to turn to Islamic scholars like the Blind Sheikh.
Now, understand: there was no doubt what the Blind Sheikh was on trial for. And there was no doubt that he was a terrorist—after all, he bragged about it. But that did not disqualify him, in the minds of these moderate, peaceful Muslims, from rendering authoritative opinions on the meaning of the core tenets of their religion. No one was saying that they would follow the Blind Sheikh into terrorism—but no one was discrediting his status either."
Op. Cit.
c. And this is the sort of response one can expect from the knee-jerk Leftists:
"I work with them as a job, I get to see first hand what suffering they have endured, what horrors they have fled and iy highlights what heartless and evil ***** the people who bang on about them being a swarm of terrorists actually are." The Irish... And Who Didn't 'Help' Them Succeed
Yes, not all Catholics were terrorists, just because of the IRA.
Let's be clear....I never said "all."
Your mistake was in saying "few."
Again, when I say "few," I'm talking about those living in Western Civilization, and those choosing to come here to live.
In the rest of the world, it is "some"
What president since the amnesty maker Reagan has the US ever not had an open border policy?
Open border means loss of sovereignty.
Hence....the end of nationhood.
..
"....a few backward stragglers notwithstanding."
Are you referring to Islamists???
Would you mind defining "few"?
It refers to all those that cling to a backward world view--including the Islamic far-right.
You seem to be floundering....
(sigh...) I waited patiently for the apologist for the indefensible to support his post....the claim that a mere "few" Muslims are engaged in the horrific terrorist acts found abundantly in the headlines, from beheadings, to targeted assassinations of Christian children...
...but our apolgist....who is often the same sort of apologist for the failure in the White House....seems to be reluctant to provide support for his contention.
But....ever magnanimous....I am here to help!
The claim by "8" was that it is only a "few" Muslims....
"few
Generally means three. No less than three can be slightly more. Three is the most common number associated with few."
Urban Dictionary: few
But perhaps our pal means "a few.....as a percentage of the Ummah"
Welll ....3% of the Muslim world population would be nearly 50 million Muslims homicidal maniacs.
And that is certainly not a number of pathological criminals to ignore.....contrary to the suggestion inherent in the use of "few."
And, unfortunately,....polls of Muslims who subscribe to violence puts the percentage far higher.
Another apologist argument down the drain.
The few I was referring to, were those among western civilization who the Enlightenment left behind. I went on to include the few members of the islamic far-right who now live in western countries.
Are you now claiming that the "few" referred to in your series of post are not the seventh century maniacs whose raison d'être is the slaughter of every single human being who does not subscribe to the exact same doctrines that they do?
Is that your claim?
If so....
1....one can only wonder why it appears in this thread...
and
2. ...that you seem to be very much at odds with truth.
I have no doubt that anyone reading your series of posts will recognize that you tried to shield the barbarians, realized that you could not...and are now attempting to beat a hasty retreat.
Just not hasty enough.
Your implication is that support for Sharia is analogous to violent extremism. Is that so?
Now....about the Liar-in-Chief... Does Obama recognize the problems of lack of assimilation? And that sharia is the very antithesis of the US Constitution?
So....why is he in such a rush to bring thousands of Middle Eastern Muslims here?
Why?
14. " Sharia rejects freedom of speech as much as freedom of religion. It rejects the idea of equal rights between men and women as much as between Muslim and non-Muslim. It brooks no separation between spiritual life and civil society. It is a comprehensive framework for human life, dictating matters of government, economy, and combat, along with personal behavior such as contact between the sexes and personal hygiene. Sharia aims to rule both believers and non-believers, and it affirmatively sanctions jihad in order to do so.
.... under it, Muslim converts to Christianity have been subjected to capital trials for apostasy.
Even if this is not the only construction of Islam, it is absurd to claim—as President Obama did during his recent visit to a mosque in Baltimore—that it is not a mainstream interpretation. In fact, it is the mainstream interpretation in many parts of the world.
Last year, Americans were horrified by the beheadings of three Western journalists by ISIS. American and European politicians could not get to microphones fast enough to insist that these decapitations had nothing to do with Islam. Yet within the same time frame, the government of Saudi Arabia beheaded eight people for various violations of sharia—the law that governs Saudi Arabia." Islam—Facts or Dreams?
Any who are not the indelibly indoctrinated can see the truth.....and the danger.
Democrats/Liberals have sold us put for their own benefit.
Now....about the Liar-in-Chief... Does Obama recognize the problems of lack of assimilation? And that sharia is the very antithesis of the US Constitution?
So....why is he in such a rush to bring thousands of Middle Eastern Muslims here?
Why?
14. " Sharia rejects freedom of speech as much as freedom of religion. It rejects the idea of equal rights between men and women as much as between Muslim and non-Muslim. It brooks no separation between spiritual life and civil society. It is a comprehensive framework for human life, dictating matters of government, economy, and combat, along with personal behavior such as contact between the sexes and personal hygiene. Sharia aims to rule both believers and non-believers, and it affirmatively sanctions jihad in order to do so.
.... under it, Muslim converts to Christianity have been subjected to capital trials for apostasy.
Even if this is not the only construction of Islam, it is absurd to claim—as President Obama did during his recent visit to a mosque in Baltimore—that it is not a mainstream interpretation. In fact, it is the mainstream interpretation in many parts of the world.
Last year, Americans were horrified by the beheadings of three Western journalists by ISIS. American and European politicians could not get to microphones fast enough to insist that these decapitations had nothing to do with Islam. Yet within the same time frame, the government of Saudi Arabia beheaded eight people for various violations of sharia—the law that governs Saudi Arabia." Islam—Facts or Dreams?
Any who are not the indelibly indoctrinated can see the truth.....and the danger.
Democrats/Liberals have sold us put for their own benefit.
That may be, just as it may be for all those who want to put their idea of Christianity above civil laws, but that isn't a threat in a plural society, strongly guarded by a written constitution and a Supreme Court that believes in upholding the prohibitions therein in an absolute manner.
The only threat could come if more Scalias and Thomases were to be appointed.