Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
Breitbart and Infowars are in the pink on the Right and so is Occupy Democrats on the left.The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
That Briebart is with infowars, and Occupy democrats isnt off the left side of the chart shows this for what it is, more left partisan attempts at equivocation.
And CNN in the center? Really? The Times in the center, Really?
Worthless Chart is Worthless.
Breitbart and Infowars are in the pink on the Right and so is Occupy Democrats on the left.The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
That Briebart is with infowars, and Occupy democrats isnt off the left side of the chart shows this for what it is, more left partisan attempts at equivocation.
And CNN in the center? Really? The Times in the center, Really?
Worthless Chart is Worthless.
Either you can't read a chart of you are being deliberately a deliverer of 'fake news.'
The defenders of the Fake News of the conservatives are loud this morning.
Sorry Jake, I just noticed that you intended for this to be a clean discussion.The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
Vanessa Otero @vlotero
TinyTachyon @tinytachyon 22h22 hours ago Vanessa Otero @vlotero 20h20 hours ago
Nonsense. I agree that CNN does not belong in the middle. The other poster is a global conspiracy guy, so he is disregarded and on silent ignore for this thread from here on out.Breitbart and Infowars are in the pink on the Right and so is Occupy Democrats on the left.The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
That Briebart is with infowars, and Occupy democrats isnt off the left side of the chart shows this for what it is, more left partisan attempts at equivocation.
And CNN in the center? Really? The Times in the center, Really?
Worthless Chart is Worthless.
Either you can't read a chart of you are being deliberately a deliverer of 'fake news.'
The defenders of the Fake News of the conservatives are loud this morning.
How is Briebart "fake" news. briebart doesn't shy away from the fact that it is biased, but to put it at the level of infowars and Occupy democrats is proof of bias in the chart, even if puitting CNN and the Times in the "middle" isn't enough of a giveaway. The chart is more fake than Briebart ever is.
Nonsense. I agree that CNN does not belong in the middle. The other poster is a global conspiracy guy, so he is disregarded and on silent ignore for this thread from here on out.Breitbart and Infowars are in the pink on the Right and so is Occupy Democrats on the left.The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
That Briebart is with infowars, and Occupy democrats isnt off the left side of the chart shows this for what it is, more left partisan attempts at equivocation.
And CNN in the center? Really? The Times in the center, Really?
Worthless Chart is Worthless.
Either you can't read a chart of you are being deliberately a deliverer of 'fake news.'
The defenders of the Fake News of the conservatives are loud this morning.
How is Briebart "fake" news. briebart doesn't shy away from the fact that it is biased, but to put it at the level of infowars and Occupy democrats is proof of bias in the chart, even if puitting CNN and the Times in the "middle" isn't enough of a giveaway. The chart is more fake than Briebart ever is.
The placings are of course debatable, based on solid facts and evidence, but not fake nes.
I don't have to. You have to show how it is not. Neither the crazy liberals nor the nutty conservatives are going to get away with 'fake news' again.Nonsense. I agree that CNN does not belong in the middle. The other poster is a global conspiracy guy, so he is disregarded and on silent ignore for this thread from here on out.Breitbart and Infowars are in the pink on the Right and so is Occupy Democrats on the left.The following description makes some sense from Liberal Utter Garbage/Conspiracy Theories to Conservative Utter Garbage/Liberal Theories. I am interested what board members think of the Mainstream (minimal partisan bias) list: The Wall Street Journal, etc.
That Briebart is with infowars, and Occupy democrats isnt off the left side of the chart shows this for what it is, more left partisan attempts at equivocation.
And CNN in the center? Really? The Times in the center, Really?
Worthless Chart is Worthless.
Either you can't read a chart of you are being deliberately a deliverer of 'fake news.'
The defenders of the Fake News of the conservatives are loud this morning.
How is Briebart "fake" news. briebart doesn't shy away from the fact that it is biased, but to put it at the level of infowars and Occupy democrats is proof of bias in the chart, even if puitting CNN and the Times in the "middle" isn't enough of a giveaway. The chart is more fake than Briebart ever is.
The placings are of course debatable, based on solid facts and evidence, but not fake nes.
Again, show me how Briebart is fake news.
Terrific.Almost all institutions of higher education are gearing up for a logic and information class mandatory for all freshmen and all those there now. It will teach students and faculty and staff how to parse information sources and recognize 'fake news.' Good on them. Almost all will be in place by first term of summer.
Yes, you do. You are now spamming and warned. Stop. Tell us 'why' you think Breitbart is legitimate.No, i don't. you posted a chart placing it with sites known to post puff pieces and made up opinions masquerading as fact. It's up to you to defend it.
To the uninformed reader, yes.Most poster's definition of fake news - Any news source that disagrees with me.
