A logical, simple truth with profound meaning

[ding]

You don’t know that. You are agnostic.

Red shift and background radiation don’t point to an invisible being. I’m sure of that.

Red shift and cosmic background radiation is proof the universe was created.

No it’s not. It’s only proof of expansion and an explosive start.

That’s where the SLoT dynamics come in.

Together all three tell us the universe was created from nothing.

No they don’t. You seem dumber than usual lately, are you ok?

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

 

[ding]

But you don’t know that there isn’t a consciousness without form that is responsible for creating space and time.

Those 2 things don’t point towards your invisible friend

But being agnostic you don’t know they don’t because red shift and cosmic background radiation proves the universe was created from nothing.

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

That’s because you have no understanding of scientific principles. There are no 100% efficient processes. None. Zero. Zilch.

 

[ding]

But you don’t know that there isn’t a consciousness without form that is responsible for creating space and time.

Those 2 things don’t point towards your invisible friend

But being agnostic you don’t know they don’t because red shift and cosmic background radiation proves the universe was created from nothing.

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

 

[Taz]

Red shift and background radiation don’t point to an invisible being. I’m sure of that.

Red shift and cosmic background radiation is proof the universe was created.

No it’s not. It’s only proof of expansion and an explosive start.

That’s where the SLoT dynamics come in.

Together all three tell us the universe was created from nothing.

No they don’t. You seem dumber than usual lately, are you ok?

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

Science says that it can’t see all the way back to the BB. So that’s a no.

 

[Taz]

Those 2 things don’t point towards your invisible friend

But being agnostic you don’t know they don’t because red shift and cosmic background radiation proves the universe was created from nothing.

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

That’s because you have no understanding of scientific principles. There are no 100% efficient processes. None. Zero. Zilch.

You just spew anything out. You’re funny.

 

[ding]

But being agnostic you don’t know they don’t because red shift and cosmic background radiation proves the universe was created from nothing.

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

That’s because you have no understanding of scientific principles. There are no 100% efficient processes. None. Zero. Zilch.

You just spew anything out. You’re funny.

What’s your background in science?

 

[Taz]

Those 2 things don’t point towards your invisible friend

But being agnostic you don’t know they don’t because red shift and cosmic background radiation proves the universe was created from nothing.

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

 

[ding]

Red shift and cosmic background radiation is proof the universe was created.

No it’s not. It’s only proof of expansion and an explosive start.

That’s where the SLoT dynamics come in.

Together all three tell us the universe was created from nothing.

No they don’t. You seem dumber than usual lately, are you ok?

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

Science says that it can’t see all the way back to the BB. So that’s a no.

Science proves it in other ways. Specifically, red shift, cosmic background radiation and the SLoT.

 

[ding]

But being agnostic you don’t know they don’t because red shift and cosmic background radiation proves the universe was created from nothing.

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

Yes. 100%. Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So matter and energy had a beginning and that beginning was 14 billion years ago as shown by cosmic background radiation and red shift.

 

[Taz]

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

That’s because you have no understanding of scientific principles. There are no 100% efficient processes. None. Zero. Zilch.

You just spew anything out. You’re funny.

What’s your background in science?

I have a degree in astrophysics.

 

[Taz]

No it’s not. It’s only proof of expansion and an explosive start.

That’s where the SLoT dynamics come in.

Together all three tell us the universe was created from nothing.

No they don’t. You seem dumber than usual lately, are you ok?

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

Science says that it can’t see all the way back to the BB. So that’s a no.

Science proves it in other ways. Specifically, red shift, cosmic background radiation and the SLoT.

Those don’t prove an invisible being.

 

[Taz]

No it doesn’t prove that. There’s no link between them being created from nothing.

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

Yes. 100%. Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So matter and energy had a beginning and that beginning was 14 billion years ago as shown by cosmic background radiation and red shift.

Wishful thinking on your part.

 

[ding]

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

That’s because you have no understanding of scientific principles. There are no 100% efficient processes. None. Zero. Zilch.

You just spew anything out. You’re funny.

What’s your background in science?

I have a degree in astrophysics.

You misspelled trolling.

 

[ding]

Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium.

This we do not see. So, the universe was created from nothing.

That makes no sense.

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

Yes. 100%. Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So matter and energy had a beginning and that beginning was 14 billion years ago as shown by cosmic background radiation and red shift.

Wishful thinking on your part.

No. It’s called science.

 

[ding]

That’s where the SLoT dynamics come in.

Together all three tell us the universe was created from nothing.

No they don’t. You seem dumber than usual lately, are you ok?

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

Science says that it can’t see all the way back to the BB. So that’s a no.

Science proves it in other ways. Specifically, red shift, cosmic background radiation and the SLoT.

Those don’t prove an invisible being.

But since you are agnostic you don’t know that he didn’t create the universe.

 

[Taz]

That makes no sense.

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

Yes. 100%. Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So matter and energy had a beginning and that beginning was 14 billion years ago as shown by cosmic background radiation and red shift.

Wishful thinking on your part.

No. It’s called science.

Creation science, maybe.

 

[ding]

Do you at least understand that heat flows from hotter objects to cooler objects?

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

Yes. 100%. Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So matter and energy had a beginning and that beginning was 14 billion years ago as shown by cosmic background radiation and red shift.

Wishful thinking on your part.

No. It’s called science.

Creation science, maybe.

Nope. Physics.

 

[Taz]

No they don’t. You seem dumber than usual lately, are you ok?

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

Science says that it can’t see all the way back to the BB. So that’s a no.

Science proves it in other ways. Specifically, red shift, cosmic background radiation and the SLoT.

Those don’t prove an invisible being.

But since you are agnostic you don’t know that he didn’t create the universe.

Sure, but still no proof for that.

 

[ding]

100%. The universe was literally created from nothing. Science says so.

Science says that it can’t see all the way back to the BB. So that’s a no.

Science proves it in other ways. Specifically, red shift, cosmic background radiation and the SLoT.

Those don’t prove an invisible being.

But since you are agnostic you don’t know that he didn’t create the universe.

Sure, but still no proof for that.

Says the guy who doesn’t know.

 

[Taz]

And that means that the universe was created from nothing?

Yes. 100%. Matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So matter and energy had a beginning and that beginning was 14 billion years ago as shown by cosmic background radiation and red shift.

Wishful thinking on your part.

No. It’s called science.

Creation science, maybe.

Nope. Physics.

There’s creation physics too?