A Male Fold-Out In Playboy Magazine

[Ringel05]

Last week it was the Boy Scouts. This week Playboy. What's next?

Playboy features first transgender ‘playmate’

I stopped looking at Playboy when I started high school, had the real thing by then.

You're late!

Not really....... Kindergarten, kinda....... Let's just say I enjoyed what happened, kinda set the tone for my life.....

I remember her...

I'm just glad you didn't say you were her......... I think she was 10.

 

[ChrisL]

The whole transsexual situation is just weird. Don't even try to tell me that it isn't really weird because it is. I don't want to harm them or see harm come to them. Just don't expect others to buy into your weird BS. If you were born a man, then you are a man. If you were born a woman, then you are a woman. Period. You don't get to pick your sex. You just don't. Nope, life isn't always fair. That's just the way it is. If one of these MTF transsexuals was to die and the body wasn't discovered until only bones remained, guess what? The forensics examiner would determine it to be a male based on it's skeletal structure and other features that are biologically ingrained into each of the sexes.

You sure are active in this thread. I have a question for you, why does your avatar look like you're about to rape someone?

Why is it that every time you reply to one of my posts, it is about rape?

 

[ChrisL]

You sure are active in this thread. I have a question for you, why does your avatar look like you're about to rape someone?

Not that it's my place to speak for ChrisL, but I think it rather obvious that this is an instance of you projecting your own sick, twisted sexual fantasies on her, somehow wishing and fantasizing that she would rape you.

Please seek professional help.

He actually started a thread in the Flame Zone talking about how he would enjoy raping women who supported Trump. Dude has some serious issues. We don't really know who these people are, so you can never be too careful with whom you converse, especially being a petite woman. That is the reason why I usually don't reply to some people.

He thinks he should be able to assault, rape and hurt women Trump supporters. What a big tough man, huh? Lol! That is what a liberal mindset gets you. Crazy.

 

[Crixus]

Last week it was the Boy Scouts. This week Playboy. What's next?

Playboy features first transgender ‘playmate’

It doesn't surprise me at all. Playboy was going down for years. It's likely that they think they are being foward thinking by doing this just like I
They were when they sold a magazine with nude chicks in it. Where they are out of touch is that they like the politicians just don't care, and they certainly don't want to loot at Pat in scrimpy sweat pants.

 

[Crixus]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

 

[Pogo]

You sure are active in this thread. I have a question for you, why does your avatar look like you're about to rape someone?

Not that it's my place to speak for ChrisL, but I think it rather obvious that this is an instance of you projecting your own sick, twisted sexual fantasies on her, somehow wishing and fantasizing that she would rape you.

Please seek professional help.

He actually started a thread in the Flame Zone talking about how he would enjoy raping women who supported Trump. Dude has some serious issues. We don't really know who these people are, so you can never be too careful with whom you converse, especially being a petite woman. That is the reason why I usually don't reply to some people.

He thinks he should be able to assault, rape and hurt women Trump supporters. What a big tough man, huh? Lol! That is what a liberal mindset gets you. Crazy.

Come on Chris. Rape fantasies are unquestionably disgusting, but they have nothing to do with "Liberalism". You shoot your post in the foot when you do that.

 

[Crixus]

You sure are active in this thread. I have a question for you, why does your avatar look like you're about to rape someone?

Not that it's my place to speak for ChrisL, but I think it rather obvious that this is an instance of you projecting your own sick, twisted sexual fantasies on her, somehow wishing and fantasizing that she would rape you.

Please seek professional help.

He actually started a thread in the Flame Zone talking about how he would enjoy raping women who supported Trump. Dude has some serious issues. We don't really know who these people are, so you can never be too careful with whom you converse, especially being a petite woman. That is the reason why I usually don't reply to some people.

He thinks he should be able to assault, rape and hurt women Trump supporters. What a big tough man, huh? Lol! That is what a liberal mindset gets you. Crazy.

Come on Chris. Rape fantasies are unquestionably disgusting, but they have nothing to do with "Liberalism". You shoot your post in the foot when you do that.

Rape fantasy is not a lib issue. That’s just a radical thing we say before diving into the mud.

 

[Pogo]

You sure are active in this thread. I have a question for you, why does your avatar look like you're about to rape someone?

Not that it's my place to speak for ChrisL, but I think it rather obvious that this is an instance of you projecting your own sick, twisted sexual fantasies on her, somehow wishing and fantasizing that she would rape you.

Please seek professional help.

He actually started a thread in the Flame Zone talking about how he would enjoy raping women who supported Trump. Dude has some serious issues. We don't really know who these people are, so you can never be too careful with whom you converse, especially being a petite woman. That is the reason why I usually don't reply to some people.

He thinks he should be able to assault, rape and hurt women Trump supporters. What a big tough man, huh? Lol! That is what a liberal mindset gets you. Crazy.

Come on Chris. Rape fantasies are unquestionably disgusting, but they have nothing to do with "Liberalism". You shoot your post in the foot when you do that.

Rape fantasy is not a lib issue. That’s just a radical thing we say before diving into the mud.

Engrish?

Why would you do that, for any reason?

 

[Crixus]

You sure are active in this thread. I have a question for you, why does your avatar look like you're about to rape someone?

Not that it's my place to speak for ChrisL, but I think it rather obvious that this is an instance of you projecting your own sick, twisted sexual fantasies on her, somehow wishing and fantasizing that she would rape you.

Please seek professional help.

He actually started a thread in the Flame Zone talking about how he would enjoy raping women who supported Trump. Dude has some serious issues. We don't really know who these people are, so you can never be too careful with whom you converse, especially being a petite woman. That is the reason why I usually don't reply to some people.

He thinks he should be able to assault, rape and hurt women Trump supporters. What a big tough man, huh? Lol! That is what a liberal mindset gets you. Crazy.

Come on Chris. Rape fantasies are unquestionably disgusting, but they have nothing to do with "Liberalism". You shoot your post in the foot when you do that.

Rape fantasy is not a lib issue. That’s just a radical thing we say before diving into the mud.

Engrish?

sometimes.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

When was this magically time?

Playboy has always been a political magazine.

 

[TheDude]

Won't be long now before this business is done, and Hefner is rolling in his grave. Looks like a dude in women's underwear.

The First Transgender Playmate Was Just Announced and the Pictures Are Turning Heads

As I've already pointed out in this thread a number of times, Hef was a lifetime supporter of gay and trans rights, and had already featured a trans woman in a pictorial back in 1981.

Don't project your sexual fears onto Hef.

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins.

Could you translate this into English for me?

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

That's because you're a confused quasi-dude.

No, it's because your word salad was unintelligible.

I'm giving you the opportunity to clarify your point, if you have one. If not, I'm just going to go with initial assessment, and chalk it up to your own sexual fears and insecurities.

The fact that you're now trying to project them onto me lends credence to that idea.

A challenge huh? Okay, I'll break it down for you:

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? You saying you've never heard LGBT and/or liberals suggest those who don't think like them are in the closet or "homophobic"? Get it now, or do I need to explain further?

Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations. You know what flattery means. As for imitations, LGBT culture thrives on imitation, i.e., playing the role of an opposite sex, adjusting dialect, tone etc. playing a roles.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Not much else to say. He's dead, which is already a hit, then they feature a trans. which Hefner likely wouldn't approve. As for the 1981 trans., at least "he" appears female attractive, because Hefner had taste. Also, 1981 to 2017 is 36 years, Hefner wouldn't have approved of this.

Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins.[/QUOTE]. I'm saying Playboy is nearly finished, they're desperate, they've lost control and are fucking shit up. I'm also saying modern liberal policy is a determent to society & country. Sorry, I'm not on-board with normalizing the abnormal nor reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator. In this case, reducing everyone down to the lowest uncommon denominator. I guess that means I'm homophobic. ..................Oh look Transgender Charged With Raping 10-Year-Old Girl In Bathroom

 

[theDoctorisIn]

As I've already pointed out in this thread a number of times, Hef was a lifetime supporter of gay and trans rights, and had already featured a trans woman in a pictorial back in 1981.

Don't project your sexual fears onto Hef.

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins.

Could you translate this into English for me?

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

That's because you're a confused quasi-dude.

No, it's because your word salad was unintelligible.

I'm giving you the opportunity to clarify your point, if you have one. If not, I'm just going to go with initial assessment, and chalk it up to your own sexual fears and insecurities.

The fact that you're now trying to project them onto me lends credence to that idea.

A challenge huh? Okay, I'll break it down for you:

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? You saying you've never heard LGBT and/or liberals suggest those who don't think like them are in the closet or "homophobic"? Get it now, or do I need to explain further?

You misunderstand why people are called "homophobic", but that's expected. I don't know what the fuck that has to do with my post, though.

Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations. You know what flattery means. As for imitations, LGBT culture thrives on imitation, i.e., playing the role of an opposite sex, adjusting dialect, tone etc. playing a roles.

You don't spend much time around gay people, do you? Watching movies about gay people doesn't count.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Not much else to say. He's dead, which is already a hit, then they feature a trans. which Hefner likely wouldn't approve. As for the 1981 trans., at least "he" appears female attractive, because Hefner had taste. Also, 1981 to 2017 is 36 years, Hefner wouldn't have approved of this.

And here we are, at the meat of it. You want to believe that Hef wouldn't approve, because it scares you, and you want company in your fear. But the evidence shows otherwise - Hef supported trans rights his whole life, and did not fear that he would lose his masculinity by looking at a naked picture of a trans woman. You don't speak for Hef - he was orders of magnitude more confident in his masculinity and sexuality than you are.

Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins. I'm saying Playboy is nearly finished, they're desperate, they've lost control and are fucking shit up. I'm also saying modern liberal policy is a determent to society & country. Sorry, I'm not on-board with normalizing the abnormal nor reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator. In this case, reducing everyone down to the lowest uncommon denominator. I guess that means I'm homophobic. ..................Oh look Transgender Charged With Raping 10-Year-Old Girl In Bathroom

Print media is dying. But transgender models in Playboy aren't the reason.

As for your attempt to change the topic, it's already been dealt with in this thread.

 

[Crixus]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

When was this magically time?

Playboy has always been a political magazine.

No, not really. Sure, political views were asked about and given, but it was not a political magazine at all. At least not by today's standards.

 

[WinterBorn]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

When was this magically time?

Playboy has always been a political magazine.

No, not really. Sure, political views were asked about and given, but it was not a political magazine at all. At least not by today's standards.

You mean there were articles?

 

[TheDude]

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins.

Could you translate this into English for me?

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

That's because you're a confused quasi-dude.

No, it's because your word salad was unintelligible.

I'm giving you the opportunity to clarify your point, if you have one. If not, I'm just going to go with initial assessment, and chalk it up to your own sexual fears and insecurities.

The fact that you're now trying to project them onto me lends credence to that idea.

A challenge huh? Okay, I'll break it down for you:

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? You saying you've never heard LGBT and/or liberals suggest those who don't think like them are in the closet or "homophobic"? Get it now, or do I need to explain further?

You misunderstand why people are called "homophobic", but that's expected. I don't know what the fuck that has to do with my post, though.

Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations. You know what flattery means. As for imitations, LGBT culture thrives on imitation, i.e., playing the role of an opposite sex, adjusting dialect, tone etc. playing a roles.

You don't spend much time around gay people, do you? Watching movies about gay people doesn't count.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Not much else to say. He's dead, which is already a hit, then they feature a trans. which Hefner likely wouldn't approve. As for the 1981 trans., at least "he" appears female attractive, because Hefner had taste. Also, 1981 to 2017 is 36 years, Hefner wouldn't have approved of this.

And here we are, at the meat of it. You want to believe that Hef wouldn't approve, because it scares you, and you want company in your fear. But the evidence shows otherwise - Hef supported trans rights his whole life, and did not fear that he would lose his masculinity by looking at a naked picture of a trans woman. You don't speak for Hef - he was orders of magnitude more confident in his masculinity and sexuality than you are.

Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins. I'm saying Playboy is nearly finished, they're desperate, they've lost control and are fucking shit up. I'm also saying modern liberal policy is a determent to society & country. Sorry, I'm not on-board with normalizing the abnormal nor reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator. In this case, reducing everyone down to the lowest uncommon denominator. I guess that means I'm homophobic. ..................Oh look Transgender Charged With Raping 10-Year-Old Girl In Bathroom

Print media is dying. But transgender models in Playboy aren't the reason.

As for your attempt to change the topic, it's already been dealt with in this thread.

So you are gay. Seriously, I don't care. You managed to validate my original point throughout.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Could you translate this into English for me?

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

That's because you're a confused quasi-dude.

No, it's because your word salad was unintelligible.

I'm giving you the opportunity to clarify your point, if you have one. If not, I'm just going to go with initial assessment, and chalk it up to your own sexual fears and insecurities.

The fact that you're now trying to project them onto me lends credence to that idea.

A challenge huh? Okay, I'll break it down for you:

To LGBT, calling them who they are means you're secretly part of the team, right liberal? You saying you've never heard LGBT and/or liberals suggest those who don't think like them are in the closet or "homophobic"? Get it now, or do I need to explain further?

You misunderstand why people are called "homophobic", but that's expected. I don't know what the fuck that has to do with my post, though.

Don't flatter yourselves, it adds to your imitations. You know what flattery means. As for imitations, LGBT culture thrives on imitation, i.e., playing the role of an opposite sex, adjusting dialect, tone etc. playing a roles.

You don't spend much time around gay people, do you? Watching movies about gay people doesn't count.

Cause and effect, Hefner is dead and so is Playboy. Not much else to say. He's dead, which is already a hit, then they feature a trans. which Hefner likely wouldn't approve. As for the 1981 trans., at least "he" appears female attractive, because Hefner had taste. Also, 1981 to 2017 is 36 years, Hefner wouldn't have approved of this.

And here we are, at the meat of it. You want to believe that Hef wouldn't approve, because it scares you, and you want company in your fear. But the evidence shows otherwise - Hef supported trans rights his whole life, and did not fear that he would lose his masculinity by looking at a naked picture of a trans woman. You don't speak for Hef - he was orders of magnitude more confident in his masculinity and sexuality than you are.

Anytime failure is certain liberal policy takes the reins. I'm saying Playboy is nearly finished, they're desperate, they've lost control and are fucking shit up. I'm also saying modern liberal policy is a determent to society & country. Sorry, I'm not on-board with normalizing the abnormal nor reducing everyone down to the lowest common denominator. In this case, reducing everyone down to the lowest uncommon denominator. I guess that means I'm homophobic. ..................Oh look Transgender Charged With Raping 10-Year-Old Girl In Bathroom

Print media is dying. But transgender models in Playboy aren't the reason.

As for your attempt to change the topic, it's already been dealt with in this thread.

So you are gay. Seriously, I don't care. You managed to validate my original point throughout.

Nope, straight as an arrow.

What "point" are you referring to? I wasn't aware you made one.

 

[Valerie]

Last week it was the Boy Scouts. This week Playboy. What's next?

Playboy features first transgender ‘playmate’

sorry snowflake!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

When was this magically time?

Playboy has always been a political magazine.

No, not really. Sure, political views were asked about and given, but it was not a political magazine at all. At least not by today's standards.

Yes, really.

Playboy has always been a place for political opinions, particularly ones that challenge accepted views. Perhaps you were just distracted by the pictures.

For example, Playboy started publishing articles in support of gay rights in 1951.

 

[Crixus]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

When was this magically time?

Playboy has always been a political magazine.

No, not really. Sure, political views were asked about and given, but it was not a political magazine at all. At least not by today's standards.

Yes, really.

Playboy has always been a place for political opinions, particularly ones that challenge accepted views. Perhaps you were just distracted by the pictures.

For example, Playboy started publishing articles in support of gay rights in 1951.

In support of or were they informing the consumer? You don’t need to twisting everything into supporting a political position. That’s that hyper partisan type shit that wrecks things like playboy.

 

[Crixus]

magazines are dead. Free porn is all over the internet.
Frankly, posting naked pics of crazy people wont revive it, either.

Like you said, porn takes care of that for us. For real though, Play bow would do really good articles. It was a good magazine before the age of hyper political crap started.

When was this magically time?

Playboy has always been a political magazine.

No, not really. Sure, political views were asked about and given, but it was not a political magazine at all. At least not by today's standards.

You mean there were articles?

Yup. Some good ones to. I think Hannity even may have done one. Don’t know.