Hush Money Trial Starts Monday: Ex-Playmate Karen McDougal details 'love' affair with Trump

[Lakhota]

 

[Lakhota]

 

[surada]

An opinion…meh..

In the second paragraph of the Statement of Facts, Bragg claims: "From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant's electoral prospects."

 

[Lakhota]

Pecker first...

David Pecker, Former National Enquirer Publisher, Set To Testify First In Trump Trial​

 

[ThisIsMe]

In the second paragraph of the Statement of Facts, Bragg claims: "From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant's electoral prospects."

Ok? And I’m sure they will prove those allegations in court, right? I’ll wait to see the results of the court case.

 

[ThisIsMe]

View attachment 935831

Good deal, hope it happens this way, it will be wonderful…

 

[surada]

Ok? And I’m sure they will prove those allegations in court, right? I’ll wait to see the results of the court case.

David Pecker testifies to that.

 

[WorldWatcher]

David Pecker testifies to that.

WW

 

[ThisIsMe]

David Pecker testifies to that.

And…the defense gets to poke holes in his testimony. That’s how it works. If they find him guilty, then fine, until then, I’ll wait and see what happens.

 

[Lakhota]

Trump can't "catch and kill" Pecker's story at his trial.



PECKER UP: National Enquirer publisher to be 1st witness in Trump hush money trial

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Lakhota]

 

[WEATHER53]

Tawdry issues really get the lib loon emotions in gear. Thinkers have actual reality to attend to

 

[Rawley]

View attachment 931325

Ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal revealed intimate details about her “love” affair with former President Trump Friday — while announcing her surprising pick for president in 2024.

McDougal — one of the women at the center of Trump’s Manhattan “hush money” charges — is a lifelong Republican who voted for him in 2016.

“He can be crass and vulgar, but when he has his kind moments, it’s lovely to see because it shows there’s still a human in there,” she explained.

“He needs to have more compassion for people in general — a lot more.”

McDougal described a tender 10-month relationship with the married then-reality TV star beginning in 2006.

“I was in love with him. He was in love with me. I know that because he told me all the time,” the actress told the Mail. “He’d say, ‘You’re my baby and I love you.’ He showed me off to his friends.”

More at the link below...

Ex-Playmate Karen McDougal details 'love' affair with Trump​

We must not forget that Karen McDougal will also be a witness at Trump's hush money trial. She had a ten-month affair with Trump. What do you think.

WHat does her testimony have to do with Trump allegedly falsifying records?

 

[Rawley]

#1 There are three different entities involved, each is separate: Trump (the individual), Trump Organization (a business entity), and a campaign.

You just solidified that Trump in fact DID pay for the NDA not for personal reasons, but in support of the campaign. Something Trump supporters vehemently deny.
.
.
#2 Boinking a porn star while on vacation in Las Vegas attending a golf tournament is not a legitimate business expense for the Trump Organization. Now the Trump Organization could have paid for the NDA without legal jeopardy by entering it in the ledger for what it was a non-business, non-tax deductible charge. Again, not legal problems. But instead the scheme was to invoice it as "Attorney Fees" (tax deductible) instead of as a non-tax deductible expense.

WW

LOL Why didn't you let Bragg know that Trump committed tax fraud? One would think after eight years his office might have thought of that one.

 

[Rawley]

Ok? And I’m sure they will prove those allegations in court, right? I’ll wait to see the results of the court case.

Why would the need to prove it? They didn't charge him with influencing an election

 

[Rawley]

But the state will be showing to the jury that the Trump Organization (business entity) falsified business records (not personal records) when members of the organization along with FPOTUS#45 conspired to commit the crime that Cohen was convicted of.

Have they yet told you what "records" Trump falsified?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Why would the need to prove it? They didn't charge him with influencing an election

Well, that is supposedly the underlying crime used to upgrade the book keeping error to a felony. Again, never underestimate the depths at which the left will sink to in order to win

 

[Rawley]

Well, that is supposedly the underlying crime used to upgrade the book keeping error to a felony. Again, never underestimate the depths at which the left will sink to in order to win

I've heard that. Going to have to look at that a bit closer. Makes this case even more absurd.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I've heard that. Going to have to look at that a bit closer. Makes this case even more absurd.

Yep, it’s absurd..I’ve got the popcorn ready. It’s going to be an interesting few months ahead.