A Snapshot of "selling out to Israel" our troops

LaDexter

Gold Member
Jun 5, 2016
10,361
843
290
We know that this election is essentially

Clinton/Bush/Obama vs. Trump

Hate to admit it, but my side had its chance, and Gary Johnson wasn't up to the task. Bob Barr would be winning this election had he been the Libertarian Candidate.

So in this unholy alliance of Bush and Clinton (all the Bushes are backing Hillary), a quick review of what W did in one aspect of the "Terror War" will demonstrate why the United States cannot afford another term of this group.

Most of you know I am a 911 Truther. Ok, assume we were hit by "Al Qaeda" based in Afghan and our troops were rightfully deployed there. When our troops arrived, there was an ongoing civil war in Afghan between Taliban (including Col Osman's orphanage "Al Qaeda") and something called Northern Alliance. Iran in 2001 had been quiet since the kidnappings by Khomeni, and had voted "moderate" with Rafsanjani, who was in power in 2001. With Afghan on its border, Iran had a choice - do nothing, support Taliban, or back Northern Alliance (TNA). The Taliban included Sunnis, while TNA included Shias. Naturally, Rafsanjani had Iran arming and funding TNA. Indeed, the "moderate" player there, TNA welcomed our troops and helped them.,. initially.

Northern Alliance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Northern Alliance fought a defensive war against the Taliban government. They received support from Iran"


Then W sold out...

His master Netanyahu didn't want any part of a US alliance with Iran. Presumably, getting the "911 terrorists" was "The Priority," but W later admitted it wasn't. Living in San Diego at the time, our Marines started telling us our Afghan deployment was "just sitting there" with "no target" and "nobody there knew who Al Qaeda was."

W then completely flipped off TNA with his "Axis of Evil" suck up to Israel. Iran was evil, so TNA must be too.

W deployed our troops to country A to fight enemy B with ally C, and then flipped off ally C with our troops still there and the mission not accomplished.

That's at least 200 of our casualties in Afghan, W's flipping off TNA.

If you want another Commander in Chief who will put

Sucking up to ISRAEL

over

the lives of our troops and the national interest of the US


vote for Hillary, because she has the same master....
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Apparently nobody on USMB thinks W did anything wrong here. Who cares about our troops?

The GOP - get real. The pre 1998 GOP cared, but they no longer exist. The post 1998 GOP doesn't have anything in common with the pre-1998 GOP, which was a patriotic and fiscally conservative party

The Dems/Hillary - get real - did Madeleine Albright care about the life of the US pilot she wanted to fly "low enough and slow enough so Saddam can shoot it down and start the war WE want?"

It is telling about the mentality of people here that they do not care about this subject, but subjects like how Trump legally took a loss on his taxes gets 4000000 idiotic responses.


Is there a single USMB member besides me who thinks just selling out the lives of our troops to suck up to the Israel lobby is wrong????


didn't think so...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
and, to those who were absolutely obsessed with Ahmadinijad, he only wins in 2005 because Rafsanjani trusted W and got stabbed in the back. That's when Iran became a problem again. That cost us what, in taxdollars??? About four billion?

So, in short, Iran was a non-problem in 2001 waging war in Afghan AGAINST the Taliban.

Then W sold out our troops and put Ahmadinijad in power.

Hillary would've done the same thing, bowing to the same master...




 

Forum List

Back
Top