Really?As magnanimous as I am, just say the word and I will provide a curriculum that might....might....make you a tad less an imbecile.
It requires that bête noire of yours.....books.
What book may THAT be?
Trump's picture book.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really?As magnanimous as I am, just say the word and I will provide a curriculum that might....might....make you a tad less an imbecile.
It requires that bête noire of yours.....books.
What a crackpot, traitor.............SURPRISE.1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork
Goldberg's mother Lucianne Goldberg was involved in the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal as detailed in The New Yorker.
West writes on the extent of Soviet influence during the Roosevelt and Truman Presidencies.
WTF?4. Extra Credit:
View attachment 664713
And I want you to do what I do: check every statement for accuracy.
BFD, you got crackpots like yourself.Get started forthwith.
What a crackpot, traitor.............SURPRISE.
From 1973 to 1977, he served as Solicitor General under President Richard Nixon and President Gerald Ford, successfully arguing several cases before the Supreme Court. During the October 1973 Saturday Night Massacre, Bork became acting U.S. Attorney General after his superiors in the U.S. Justice Department chose to resign rather than fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, who was investigating the Watergate scandal.
Following an order from the President, Bork fired Cox, his first assignment as Acting Attorney General. Bork served as Acting Attorney General until January 4, 1974, and was succeeded by Ohio U.S. Senator William B. Saxbe.
On October 20, 1973, Solicitor General Bork was instrumental in the "Saturday Night Massacre" when President Richard Nixon ordered the firing of Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox following Cox's request for tapes of his Oval Office conversations.
Goldberg's mother Lucianne Goldberg was involved in the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal as detailed in The New Yorker.
Goldberg has spoken of his mother and the Lewinsky scandal:
My mother was the one who advised Linda Tripp to record her conversations with Monica Lewinsky and to save the dress. I was privy to some of that stuff, and when the administration set about to destroy Lewinsky, Tripp, and my mom, I defended my mom and by extension Tripp ... I have zero desire to have those arguments again. I did my bit in the trenches of Clinton's trousers.
Jonah Goldberg
West writes on the extent of Soviet influence during the Roosevelt and Truman Presidencies.
She argues that infiltration of the American government by Stalinist agents and fellow-travelers had significantly altered Allied policies in favor of the Soviet Union during the Second World War.
Frank J. Gaffney Jr. finds that West "painstakingly documents how America's government, media, academia, political and policy elites actively helped obscure the true nature of the Soviet Union."
West contends that there is a parallel with the failure to face the dangers of communism in the 1930s and the failure to face the threat of Islamic extremism today.
Diana West
WTF?
"Illiberal left"?
Never describes HOW they are silencing free speech, just a rant.
BFD, you got crackpots like yourself.
7. “An Originalist Victory
The Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling is a tremendous success for the constitutional theory around which conservatives rallied for nearly half a century.
To acknowledge this achievement is to acknowledge the constitutional theory around which the coalition that brought it about rallied for a half-century: originalism. It was originalism that the pro-life movement adopted after Roe and supported through the confirmation defeat of Robert Bork; the attempted defeats of Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh; and the setback of Casey. The goal of overruling Roe and Casey bound the conservative political movement to the conservative legal movement, and originalism was their common constitutional theory.”
Dobbs Abortion Ruling Is a Triumph for Originalists | City Journal
If there is disagreement, the only argument available is to find any mention of abortion in the Constitution.
Or….to cleave to this argument:
"We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is, and the judiciary is the safeguard of our liberty and of our property under the Constitution."
Speech before the Chamber of Commerce, Elmira, New York (3 May 1907); published in Addresses and Papers of Charles Evans Hughes, Governor of New York, 1906–1908 (1908), p. 139
And this was a Republican.....clearly not a conservative.
The FBI said there were no guns.
"So much for 'armed insurrection': FBI official says no guns confiscated at Jan. 6 Capitol riot"
So much for 'armed insurrection': FBI official says no guns confiscated at Jan. 6 Capitol riot
An FBI official had some bad news for Democrats at a congressional hearing Wednesday on the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Here's the Daily Caller:www.americanthinker.com
So we can agree that you are a mindless drone who simply repeats what your masters tell you to?
A full term baby is not viable.
If you put it on the table and leave it, as Democrats are wont to do, it will die.
New born babies require support in order to survive.
Babies in the womb require support in order to survive.
Are you suggesting euthanasia as a practice in the United States?
Is a patient with terminal cancer viable?
Because the life of the living, feeling, hearing, seeing, baby in the womb isn't a valid argument for the inconvenience of the consequences of recreational sex.
And based on the above, every American is pro-life.
I just did, moron.Wow!!!
You'll do anything not to read, huh?
Because you only get one side of the story..................THEIRS.How about you read the books and make up your own mind....
Sure, regurgitating opinions, I'll leave to the gullible.;
....Oh.....I forgot....you'd lose your Liberal creds if you did that.
how old was that link vs real time video & communications from guess whoooooooooooooo -
the secret service. so you fail.
Any which has been BORN is entitled to constitutional protections by virtue of equal protection .No, you are far from a constitutionalist, or enen an adherent in the DoI
. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.
And based on the above, every American is pro-life.
View attachment 664660
The liberal versus conservative paradigm is a mentally retarded political science schema that continues to be spat out of the mouth of degenerate drones .1. "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,"
by Robert H. Bork
2. "Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change,"
by Jonah Goldberg
3. "American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation's Character,"
by Diana West
4. Extra Credit:
View attachment 664713
And I want you to do what I do: check every statement for accuracy.
Get started forthwith.
" Claiming Innocence While Exclaiming Carnality "
* Self Aggrandized Preformationism Melodrama *
Any which has been BORN is entitled to constitutional protections by virtue of equal protection .
Those opposing abortion and capital punishment make the claim that a biological life should not be ended , but the constitution requires birth for instantiation of wrights that includes a wright to life , while any sentenced to death has had their constitutional wright to life removed .
* Embracing Without Understanding *
At the same time, the Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are different kinds of documents with different purposes. The Declaration was designed to justify breaking away from a government; the Constitution and Bill of Rights were designed to establish a government.The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center
Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.constitutioncenter.org
Given the 19th amendment , that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL surreptitiously includes that all WOMEN ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL WITH MEN as they were made after the fact from a RIB BONE .
PER SON means MALE and COUNTABLE BY CENSUS .
" Blabbering Non Sense While Betraying Individual Liberty "
* Sanctimonious Psychopathy Bemoans The Root Term Liberty As Heinous Liberalism *
The liberal versus conservative paradigm is a mentally retarded political science schema that continues to be spat out of the mouth of degenerate drones .
Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism that advocates free market and laissez-faire economics; civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on limited government, economic freedom, and political freedom.Classical liberalism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Classical liberalism, contrary to liberal branches like social liberalism, looks more negatively on social policies, taxation and the state involvement in the lives of individuals, and it advocates deregulation.[8]
Oh my , am I a dunce ?Liberals are not classical liberals......they are the Socialist Party in disguise, dunce.
they have co-opted the term itself.
John Dewey got the Socialist Party to take the name Liberal.
These are not the classical liberals with which they'd like to be identified.
Communist John Dewey did the deed.
How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron
- Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
- The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
- Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
- [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
- In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
- But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
- Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
- The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
- Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
- [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. o-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.
http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm
Democracy & free markets vs socialism
www.freerepublic.com
http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2
What if a woman is carrying the bastard of another man ?No, moron.....it is a human being from the instant the two strands of DNA join.
At fertilization, continued in the birth canal, and up to the moment of death.
So...no, you cannot kill the human being and claim it is not murder.