ABC News Is Perplexed: Why Isn’t Kamala Harris Getting a Post-Debate Bounce? The Answer Is…

[Doc7505]

ABC News Is Perplexed: Why Isn’t Kamala Harris Getting a Post-Debate Bounce? ​

The Answer Is…​

ABC News Is Perplexed: Why Isn’t Kamala Harris Getting a Post-Debate Bounce? The Answer Is…

pjmedia.com

16 Sep 2024 ~~ By Scott Pinsker

This brings us to the first opinion polls from the Harris-Biden presidential debate: The verdict is in, and Kamala Harris did such a wonderful, splendid performance… she picked up NO new voters.
ABC News, the same network that hosted the debate/train wreck, put a happy spin on its poll results: “Harris seen as debate winner while maintaining slight lead over Trump: POLL” (For the sub-header, you can almost hear the “womp-womp” sad sax music: “Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris shows little impact, the poll found.”)
Alas, CNN (believe it or not) pulled back the curtain with a more truthful spin: “New poll finds no change in presidential race post-debate” CNN’s first two sentences let the cat out of the bag: “New polling post-debate from ABC News and Ipson finds Vice President Kamala Harris leading former President Trump among likely voters, with the margin in the race unchanged from ABC News polling conducted in late August. Overall, 52% of likely voters back Harris, 46% Trump in the poll, the same margin the pollsters found among likely voters in an August 23 through 27 poll.” [emphasis added]
So what gives? By all objective accounts, last week’s debate was NOT Trump’s best moment. Why aren’t the American people punishing him more in the polls? Why didn’t Harris shoot ahead by a dozen or so points?
It goes back to proportionality. We have an instinctive impulse for fairness.
~Snip~
Last week’s debate was a three-on-one dumpster fire. The media wants to talk about Kamala eating Trump’s lunch, but the American people are talking about who’s eating cats. Our lasting takeaways were the utter weirdness of it all — and the intrinsic unfairness of a three-on-one debate.
Plus, the obvious implication: The media must’ve helped Kamala that much… because she needed the help. Clearly, she can’t do it on her own.
So, no, we won’t reward her for “winning” a three-on-one fistfight. Kamala Harris wasn’t the plucky heroine who KO’d the class bully; she was the shrieking banshee who stretched out his shirt while the moderators held him down.
And so, nothing was decided. Our journey remains unresolved.


Commentary:
The Democrat Leftist contributors to this board have been touting obscene humbers of Harris over Trump after the September 10th three man tag team debacle against Trump.
The fact is that the Harris campaign even with the Quisling Media's assisstance has had a "Dead Cat Bounce".
Aside from the history of Neo-Marxist ideology and all the previous rhetoric about Fracking, oil production, low taxes, and the law enforcement, Harris decided to reverse course for this election. Everything Kamala Harris was against before she now say's she os for.
Harris at best is an empty pants suit "Red Diaper Baby".

 

[luiza]

Is it that hard for Americans to spot the landslide result ?

 

[lafayette]

Probably less than 6% have made up their minds. She has solidly won the debate by 18 points but that has maybe increased her margin of error lead by 1%.

Trump will (he cannot help it) booboo again.

 

[Doc7505]

Is it that hard for Americans to spot the landslide result ?

~~~~~~

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump

 

[rampart]

Is it that hard for Americans to spot the landslide result ?

we saw it all right .this debate inflicted a deeper wound than either fake assassination.

it came down to trump admitting that harris' ear rings are smarter than he is

if kamala was wearing smart ear rings, i want a pair.

maybe as dangerfield

i get no respect i never win an argument with mrs rampart, her ear rings are smarter than i am.

 

[crossbody]

The media did not judge the debate truthfully, so now Kamala is collapsing.

What we saw at home is not what was reported, and we do not have lying eyes. We saw a woman with a strange, awkward, and weird look on her face as she kept starring at Trump in a strange SNL-style of oddness. Kamala Harris looked silly starring to the right at Trump like a child. That is what we saw at home.

We saw that Kamala Harris failed to look straight ahead and present herself as presidential material. From Trump, we saw Trump just being Trump.

The truth has now prevailed.

 

[crossbody]

we saw it all right .this debate inflicted a deeper wound than either fake assassination.

it came down to trump admitting that harris' ear rings are smarter than he is

if kamala was wearing smart ear rings, i want a pair.

maybe as dangerfield

i get no respect i never win an argument with mrs rampart, her ear rings are smarter than i am.

so what you're saying is that even with microphone earrings on and some one giving Kamala answers; that she is still a loser with no debate bounce, no Taylor Swift bounce, no nothing ?

Could it be that Kamala Harris is the problem? She is not presidential and America does to want her.

 

[Doc7505]

Is it that hard for Americans to spot the landslide result ?

 

[rampart]

so what you're saying is that even with microphone earrings on and some one giving Kamala answers; that she is still a loser with no debate bounce, no Taylor Swift bounce, no nothing ?

Could it be that Kamala Harris is the problem? She is not presidential and America does to want her.

trump insisted , from the very beginning, that this election is being held by 'rasslemania rules.

if harris had chat gpt in one ear and karl marx in the other i wouldn't care if she hit him on the head with a steel chair.

yes, we all saw "trump being trum;p": a nazi asshole unleashing krystallnacht on innocent, legally resident, neighbors.

 

[SweetSue92]

trump insisted , from the very beginning, that this election is being held by 'rasslemania rules.

if harris had chat gpt in one ear and karl marx in the other i wouldn't care if she hit him on the head with a steel chair.

yes, we all saw "trump being trum;p": a nazi asshole unleashing krystallnacht on innocent, legally resident, neighbors.

How many Haitians you taking in? Hide your cats

 

[Votto]

View attachment 1012962​

But........but.................but...............Kamala will fix everything Joe did wrong don't ya know.

Not that Joe did anything wrong, mind you.

 

[rampart]

How many Haitians you taking in? Hide your cats

we acceded similarly placed vietnamese americans after that war. that community are now among our most productive citizens, including my primary m d .

 

[SweetSue92]

we acceded similarly placed vietnamese americans after that war. that community are now among our most productive citizens, including my primary m d .

Should people who are taking geese out of ponds and cooking them be able to stay here? Or just people who go on to get MDs, in your estimation?

How about driver's licenses? Why did we have to pay thousands of dollars in fees to get our kids their license--American citizens--and Haitians just get to drive around wherever?

 

[rampart]

Should people who are taking geese out of ponds and cooking them be able to stay here? Or just people who go on to get MDs, in your estimation?

How about driver's licenses? Why did we have to pay thousands of dollars in fees to get our kids their license--American citizens--and Haitians just get to drive around wherever?

you may not remember that we had a depression here. a dust bowl a civil war.

if putin succeeds in instigating this civil war ii, we might be besieged in this version of vicksburg. you will eat cat. until they run out.

 

[hadit]

trump insisted , from the very beginning, that this election is being held by 'rasslemania rules.

if harris had chat gpt in one ear and karl marx in the other i wouldn't care if she hit him on the head with a steel chair.

yes, we all saw "trump being trum;p": a nazi asshole unleashing krystallnacht on innocent, legally resident, neighbors.

Godwin's. Automatic fail.

 

[Votto]

Godwin's. Automatic fail.

After the Left started calling Trump Hitler, Godwin went on a hiatus it seems.

Wonder where he went exactly.

 

[rampart]

Godwin's. Automatic fail.

i'm familiar with fidwin. if you have a better worg for inspiring selof radicalized gangs to abuse their neighbors, i'll be very glad to use it.

 

[hadit]

i'm familiar with fidwin. if you have a better worg for inspiring selof radicalized gangs to abuse their neighbors, i'll be very glad to use it.

Sober up and we can talk.

 

[1srelluc]

After the Left started calling Trump Hitler, Godwin went on a hiatus it seems.

Wonder where he went exactly.

He tried a drinking game where downed a shot every time the MSM invoked Godwin's Law.

He passed due to alcohol poisoning.

 

[bugs]

ABC News Is Perplexed: Why Isn’t Kamala Harris Getting a Post-Debate Bounce? ​

The Answer Is…​

ABC News Is Perplexed: Why Isn’t Kamala Harris Getting a Post-Debate Bounce? The Answer Is…

pjmedia.com

16 Sep 2024 ~~ By Scott Pinsker

This brings us to the first opinion polls from the Harris-Biden presidential debate: The verdict is in, and Kamala Harris did such a wonderful, splendid performance… she picked up NO new voters.
ABC News, the same network that hosted the debate/train wreck, put a happy spin on its poll results: “Harris seen as debate winner while maintaining slight lead over Trump: POLL” (For the sub-header, you can almost hear the “womp-womp” sad sax music: “Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris shows little impact, the poll found.”)
Alas, CNN (believe it or not) pulled back the curtain with a more truthful spin: “New poll finds no change in presidential race post-debate” CNN’s first two sentences let the cat out of the bag: “New polling post-debate from ABC News and Ipson finds Vice President Kamala Harris leading former President Trump among likely voters, with the margin in the race unchanged from ABC News polling conducted in late August. Overall, 52% of likely voters back Harris, 46% Trump in the poll, the same margin the pollsters found among likely voters in an August 23 through 27 poll.” [emphasis added]
So what gives? By all objective accounts, last week’s debate was NOT Trump’s best moment. Why aren’t the American people punishing him more in the polls? Why didn’t Harris shoot ahead by a dozen or so points?
It goes back to proportionality. We have an instinctive impulse for fairness.
~Snip~
Last week’s debate was a three-on-one dumpster fire. The media wants to talk about Kamala eating Trump’s lunch, but the American people are talking about who’s eating cats. Our lasting takeaways were the utter weirdness of it all — and the intrinsic unfairness of a three-on-one debate.
Plus, the obvious implication: The media must’ve helped Kamala that much… because she needed the help. Clearly, she can’t do it on her own.
So, no, we won’t reward her for “winning” a three-on-one fistfight. Kamala Harris wasn’t the plucky heroine who KO’d the class bully; she was the shrieking banshee who stretched out his shirt while the moderators held him down.
And so, nothing was decided. Our journey remains unresolved.


Commentary:
The Democrat Leftist contributors to this board have been touting obscene humbers of Harris over Trump after the September 10th three man tag team debacle against Trump.
The fact is that the Harris campaign even with the Quisling Media's assisstance has had a "Dead Cat Bounce".
Aside from the history of Neo-Marxist ideology and all the previous rhetoric about Fracking, oil production, low taxes, and the law enforcement, Harris decided to reverse course for this election. Everything Kamala Harris was against before she now say's she os for.
Harris at best is an empty pants suit "Red Diaper Baby".

it's Because Communism is Not a Popular Thing..