About That Lying Low Life Scum Sucking POS 45 Being Able To Confront The Whistle Blower.

[bravoactual]

So, the Randian of Kentucky is demanding that, under the United States Constitution the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Dried Up Dog Turd 45 has a "Right To Confront His Accuser". Giving Randy his due, he kinda, sorta, maybe correct.

Under the Sixth Amendment of The Constitution of The United States of America, the "Accused" does have the right to confront his/her accuser. There is just one stipulation. Yes, that right written into the Constitution.

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.


Now, if you bunch of slug eating 45 sycophants want to admit that the Lying Sack of Orange Shit Traitor did break the law (he did) fine well right and good. May be prison doors him where the Mystical Magical Non-Existent Sky Shit Him.

But the 6th. Amendment only applies in Criminal Cases.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Now, I am sure the Russian Ass kissing Orange Shit Gibbon will of course plead the 5th. Amendment (Compulsory Self Incrimination is prohibited) as time goes on. But as for being allowed to confront the Whistle Blower, nope....unless he admits he is a criminal.

 

[Oddball]

Like you authoritarian goons give a shit about the Constitution in the first place.

Spare us all your twaddle.

 

[fncceo]

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.

Your huge butt aside... what is an impeachment but a trial to determine if The President had committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors'?

 

[LaDairis]

The language of the far left.....

bunch of slug eating 45 sycophants want to admit that the Lying Sack of Orange Shit Traitor

doesn't help winning elections, which is why they are trying this stunt now....

 

[Third Party]

So, the Randian of Kentucky is demanding that, under the United States Constitution the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Dried Up Dog Turd 45 has a "Right To Confront His Accuser". Giving Randy his due, he kinda, sorta, maybe correct.

Under the Sixth Amendment of The Constitution of The United States of America, the "Accused" does have the right to confront his/her accuser. There is just one stipulation. Yes, that right written into the Constitution.

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.


Now, if you bunch of slug eating 45 sycophants want to admit that the Lying Sack of Orange Shit Traitor did break the law (he did) fine well right and good. May be prison doors him where the Mystical Magical Non-Existent Sky Shit Him.

But the 6th. Amendment only applies in Criminal Cases.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Now, I am sure the Russian Ass kissing Orange Shit Gibbon will of course plead the 5th. Amendment (Compulsory Self Incrimination is prohibited) as time goes on. But as for being allowed to confront the Whistle Blower, nope....unless he admits he is a criminal.

DUE PROCESS BABY!

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump will have a chance to face his accusers when the trial is held in the Senate.

 

[fncceo]

Trump will have a chance to face his accusers when the trial is held in the Senate.

And how do you think that will go in the Senate?

 

[hadit]

So, the Randian of Kentucky is demanding that, under the United States Constitution the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Dried Up Dog Turd 45 has a "Right To Confront His Accuser". Giving Randy his due, he kinda, sorta, maybe correct.

Under the Sixth Amendment of The Constitution of The United States of America, the "Accused" does have the right to confront his/her accuser. There is just one stipulation. Yes, that right written into the Constitution.

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.


Now, if you bunch of slug eating 45 sycophants want to admit that the Lying Sack of Orange Shit Traitor did break the law (he did) fine well right and good. May be prison doors him where the Mystical Magical Non-Existent Sky Shit Him.

But the 6th. Amendment only applies in Criminal Cases.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Now, I am sure the Russian Ass kissing Orange Shit Gibbon will of course plead the 5th. Amendment (Compulsory Self Incrimination is prohibited) as time goes on. But as for being allowed to confront the Whistle Blower, nope....unless he admits he is a criminal.

False. Only if he is ACCUSED of being a criminal. Notice that the ACCUSED shall enjoy the right, not the CONVICTED.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump will have a chance to face his accusers when the trial is held in the Senate.

And how do you think that will go in the Senate?

To tell the truth, I'm not really sure at this point. The investigation is still going on and there are lots of witnesses still needed to testify.

However....................if the information that comes to light shows that he's guilty, I'm guessing that those in the Senate will see the light and vote to impeach.

But..................like I said, we have to wait and see what all the testimonies are going to bring. So far, there have been a couple of people who said Trump was shaking down the Ukraine.

 

[MarathonMike]

So, the Randian of Kentucky is demanding that, under the United States Constitution the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Dried Up Dog Turd 45 has a "Right To Confront His Accuser". Giving Randy his due, he kinda, sorta, maybe correct.

Under the Sixth Amendment of The Constitution of The United States of America, the "Accused" does have the right to confront his/her accuser. There is just one stipulation. Yes, that right written into the Constitution.

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.


Now, if you bunch of slug eating 45 sycophants want to admit that the Lying Sack of Orange Shit Traitor did break the law (he did) fine well right and good. May be prison doors him where the Mystical Magical Non-Existent Sky Shit Him.

But the 6th. Amendment only applies in Criminal Cases.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Now, I am sure the Russian Ass kissing Orange Shit Gibbon will of course plead the 5th. Amendment (Compulsory Self Incrimination is prohibited) as time goes on. But as for being allowed to confront the Whistle Blower, nope....unless he admits he is a criminal.

I sense that you do not like President Trump. Why is that? Is he too rich for you? Too unfiltered? Too honest? Too American? Just curious.

 

[Third Party]

Trump will have a chance to face his accusers when the trial is held in the Senate.

Why wait? TRANSPARENCY NOW!

 

[Timmy]

The whistleblower wasn’t even a real witness remember ? She was responding to what she heard from others . (Who have since testified)

Now Mob Boss Trump wants to expose them so they will be targeted by his goons .

 

[skews13]

Trump will have a chance to face his accusers when the trial is held in the Senate.

And how do you think that will go in the Senate?

Depends on how you define how it will go. For Trump, a temporary reprieve from his eventual prison cell. For 22 Republicans having to defend those seats next year, maybe not.

And just think, another 22 of them have to defend seats in 2022, just two years later.

I wonder how it will go.

 

[Paulie]

Like you authoritarian goons give a shit about the Constitution in the first place.

Spare us all your twaddle.

Hilarious isn’t it?

 

[Third Party]

The whistleblower wasn’t even a real witness remember ? She was responding to what she heard from others . (Who have since testified)

Now Mob Boss Trump wants to expose them so they will be targeted by his goons .

Hope so-teach them liars a lesson...

 

[Siete]

corroborated testimony-

kinda like saying fuck you mother fucker -

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH'

 

[Third Party]

corroborated testimony-

kinda like saying fuck you mother fucker -

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH'

Don't believe any of these democrat hucksters they been parading around.

 

[bravoactual]

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.

Your huge butt aside... what is an impeachment but a trial to determine if The President had committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors'?

Has a Bill of Impeachment been passed by the House laying any criminal conduct? No. This is the investigation. 6th. Amendment does not apply

 

[bravoactual]

The right to confront is guaranteed under 6th. Amendment in Criminal Cases. Are you Cons admitting fuck wad 45 is a criminal....that is how the Constitution lays it out.

 

[Third Party]

But....and this is helluva huge BUT , under the 6th. Amendment that apples to CRIMINAL CASES ONLY.

Your huge butt aside... what is an impeachment but a trial to determine if The President had committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors'?

Has a Bill of Impeachment been passed by the House laying any criminal conduct? No. This is the investigation. 6th. Amendment does not apply

Correction-not an investigation-Witch Hunt II