Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im notOr maybe that we are hard wired to worship something.Or maybe everyone else already had a religion and abrahamic religions were the ones for the middle east.Maybe he didn't have a preference for an outcome.Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
Logic is lost on youActually faith means to have complete trust in something. I don't put complete trust in anything I don't have good reason to trust.Oh bullshit ding. You have faith. Faith can only remain stable through bias.There is only one creator. He doesn't care what you call him. You intentionally muddy the water of religion and God as much as you blame acts of men for acts of God. I don't see much difference between what you do and what those you criticize did. You just have a different dogma is all.From all the evidence i have seen, the indians werent introduced to the christian god until the Europeans got on this continent and starting forcing the tribes to convert. You know, when they stole the children and forced them into indoctrinating schools..Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
There is compelling evidence that he did for the native tribes in north america.
Their stories have many things that speak of the great creator. They got it by having his spirit in everything.
Native Americans had their own version of spirits, afterlife etc. It has nothing to do with the christian god. Kinda narcissistic, dont you think?
What good reason do you have to trust your beliefs? Negatives?
Physical and moral.I see that you think you are clever. What you are is confirming your bias. That's not clever. That's ignorant and lazy.He had a concubine. Actually two if you count hagar. Although some scholars have said they were the same person.
He married his sister
He was subordinate to his sister wife
Made an illegitimate child and kicked him out
Lied to his son that he was going to kill him
He was obviously mentally ill. With some incest and sins in there.
My point is, how did this crazy person become the patriarch of Judaism, Christianity and Islam?
Apparently, despite all of these moral flaws and repugnant behavior, he was still chosen by god for loyalty. This "moral" God was able to look past all of his sins because he was willing to kill his child? WTF
And people say atheists have no morals? Lol
Before you can understand "who" God is, you have to believe that there is intelligence behind the rules which existed before space and time were created.
Which rules are you talking about ?
probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
Of course it does. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success just as failed behaviors naturally lead to failure. Do you think a master designer would not give us a way to tell the difference between doing good and rationalizing that we were doing good?Physical and moral.I see that you think you are clever. What you are is confirming your bias. That's not clever. That's ignorant and lazy.He had a concubine. Actually two if you count hagar. Although some scholars have said they were the same person.
He married his sister
He was subordinate to his sister wife
Made an illegitimate child and kicked him out
Lied to his son that he was going to kill him
He was obviously mentally ill. With some incest and sins in there.
My point is, how did this crazy person become the patriarch of Judaism, Christianity and Islam?
Apparently, despite all of these moral flaws and repugnant behavior, he was still chosen by god for loyalty. This "moral" God was able to look past all of his sins because he was willing to kill his child? WTF
And people say atheists have no morals? Lol
Before you can understand "who" God is, you have to believe that there is intelligence behind the rules which existed before space and time were created.
Which rules are you talking about ?
probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
your answer is silly------NATURAL LAW----has nothing to do with human morality. ------you should read the first chapter of your high school physics text
It's kind of embarrassing when a non-Jew has studied a bit more in depth than a Jew.Of course it does. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success just as failed behaviors naturally lead to failure. Do you think a master designer would not give us a way to tell the difference between doing good and rationalizing that we were doing good?Physical and moral.I see that you think you are clever. What you are is confirming your bias. That's not clever. That's ignorant and lazy.
Before you can understand "who" God is, you have to believe that there is intelligence behind the rules which existed before space and time were created.
Which rules are you talking about ?
probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
your answer is silly------NATURAL LAW----has nothing to do with human morality. ------you should read the first chapter of your high school physics text
The only difference between physical laws and moral laws is that when we violate a physical law the consequence is immediate.
If you don't understand the concept of a revealed religion how can you place the differences and similarities of the different world religions in the proper context?Try meWhy? It would just go ever your head.Oh gosh lol. You better define thatThere is only one revealed religion. No other makes that claim.All religions have spread to the worldGospel spread to the world.
Israel becoming a Nation again.
The world against Israel and Christianity.
ok
The world is against islam too. Weird how that works. Different religions being against the other..
I thought you were going to say something extraordinary lol
Something Huston Smith wrote stuck with me. I'm going to have to paraphrase it though as I do not have the direct quote in front of me.It's kind of embarrassing when a non-Jew has studied a bit more in depth than a Jew.Of course it does. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success just as failed behaviors naturally lead to failure. Do you think a master designer would not give us a way to tell the difference between doing good and rationalizing that we were doing good?Physical and moral.Which rules are you talking about ?
probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
your answer is silly------NATURAL LAW----has nothing to do with human morality. ------you should read the first chapter of your high school physics text
The only difference between physical laws and moral laws is that when we violate a physical law the consequence is immediate.
Anyway, very well stated.
Everyone worships something. The only choice we have in the matter is choosing what we worship.Im notOr maybe that we are hard wired to worship something.Or maybe everyone else already had a religion and abrahamic religions were the ones for the middle east.Maybe he didn't have a preference for an outcome.Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
You do realize that the laws of nature are such that beings that know and create were predestined by the laws of nature before space and time were created, right? And that tangible items can be used as evidence, right?Logic is lost on youActually faith means to have complete trust in something. I don't put complete trust in anything I don't have good reason to trust.Oh bullshit ding. You have faith. Faith can only remain stable through bias.There is only one creator. He doesn't care what you call him. You intentionally muddy the water of religion and God as much as you blame acts of men for acts of God. I don't see much difference between what you do and what those you criticize did. You just have a different dogma is all.From all the evidence i have seen, the indians werent introduced to the christian god until the Europeans got on this continent and starting forcing the tribes to convert. You know, when they stole the children and forced them into indoctrinating schools..There is compelling evidence that he did for the native tribes in north america.
Their stories have many things that speak of the great creator. They got it by having his spirit in everything.
Native Americans had their own version of spirits, afterlife etc. It has nothing to do with the christian god. Kinda narcissistic, dont you think?
What good reason do you have to trust your beliefs? Negatives?
It's kind of embarrassing when a non-Jew has studied a bit more in depth than a Jew.Of course it does. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success just as failed behaviors naturally lead to failure. Do you think a master designer would not give us a way to tell the difference between doing good and rationalizing that we were doing good?Physical and moral.Which rules are you talking about ?
probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
your answer is silly------NATURAL LAW----has nothing to do with human morality. ------you should read the first chapter of your high school physics text
The only difference between physical laws and moral laws is that when we violate a physical law the consequence is immediate.
Anyway, very well stated.
Yes, you did miss something.... what I was saying.It's kind of embarrassing when a non-Jew has studied a bit more in depth than a Jew.Of course it does. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success just as failed behaviors naturally lead to failure. Do you think a master designer would not give us a way to tell the difference between doing good and rationalizing that we were doing good?Physical and moral.probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
your answer is silly------NATURAL LAW----has nothing to do with human morality. ------you should read the first chapter of your high school physics text
The only difference between physical laws and moral laws is that when we violate a physical law the consequence is immediate.
Anyway, very well stated.
there is morality in the sir Isaac newton's laws of thermodynamics? ----gravity? ------
mass times the speed of light? -------I must have missed something
Not morality...Torah.It's kind of embarrassing when a non-Jew has studied a bit more in depth than a Jew.Of course it does. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success just as failed behaviors naturally lead to failure. Do you think a master designer would not give us a way to tell the difference between doing good and rationalizing that we were doing good?Physical and moral.probably "natural laws"----the WAY STUFF ACTS----like Sir Isaac Newton's laws of thermodynamics.
your answer is silly------NATURAL LAW----has nothing to do with human morality. ------you should read the first chapter of your high school physics text
The only difference between physical laws and moral laws is that when we violate a physical law the consequence is immediate.
Anyway, very well stated.
there is morality in the sir Isaac newton's laws of thermodynamics? ----gravity? ------
mass times the speed of light? -------I must have missed something
Im asking you to define it because our definitions might not be the same. I can think of a few ancient religions that could be defined as "revealed"If you don't understand the concept of a revealed religion how can you place the differences and similarities of the different world religions in the proper context?Try meWhy? It would just go ever your head.Oh gosh lol. You better define thatThere is only one revealed religion. No other makes that claim.All religions have spread to the world
ok
The world is against islam too. Weird how that works. Different religions being against the other..
I thought you were going to say something extraordinary lol
What is your definition?Im asking you to define it because our definitions might not be the same. I can think of a few ancient religions that could be defined as "revealed"If you don't understand the concept of a revealed religion how can you place the differences and similarities of the different world religions in the proper context?Try meWhy? It would just go ever your head.Oh gosh lol. You better define thatThere is only one revealed religion. No other makes that claim.
revelations by a god given to "prophets"What is your definition?Im asking you to define it because our definitions might not be the same. I can think of a few ancient religions that could be defined as "revealed"If you don't understand the concept of a revealed religion how can you place the differences and similarities of the different world religions in the proper context?Try meWhy? It would just go ever your head.Oh gosh lol. You better define that
That's a good answer but more broadly it means it is the only religion where God has revealed Himself to man. All other religions are men seeking God. This was the only one where God was seeking man.revelations by a god given to "prophets"What is your definition?Im asking you to define it because our definitions might not be the same. I can think of a few ancient religions that could be defined as "revealed"If you don't understand the concept of a revealed religion how can you place the differences and similarities of the different world religions in the proper context?Try meWhy? It would just go ever your head.
According to Medrish, G-d offered the Torah to all the nations and only the Jews accepted it.Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
Also Bilaam, was a prophet. He was an evil prophet, but a non Jewish prophet nonetheless.
actually BILAAM ends up a good guy-------a gentile prophet good person------started out questionable---
he probably had a rough childhood
OMG!According to Medrish, G-d offered the Torah to all the nations and only the Jews accepted it.Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
Also Bilaam, was a prophet. He was an evil prophet, but a non Jewish prophet nonetheless.
actually BILAAM ends up a good guy-------a gentile prophet good person------started out questionable---
he probably had a rough childhood
According to Medrish, G-d offered the Torah to all the nations and only the Jews accepted it.Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
Also Bilaam, was a prophet. He was an evil prophet, but a non Jewish prophet nonetheless.
actually BILAAM ends up a good guy-------a gentile prophet good person------started out questionable---
he probably had a rough childhood
No, he was evil.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
OMG!According to Medrish, G-d offered the Torah to all the nations and only the Jews accepted it.Why didnt God speak to Native Americans? Or Asians? Or Europeans?
Why didnt he speak to cro-magnum? He could have had us far more advanced
Also Bilaam, was a prophet. He was an evil prophet, but a non Jewish prophet nonetheless.
actually BILAAM ends up a good guy-------a gentile prophet good person------started out questionable---
he probably had a rough childhood
You have zero idea of what you're talking about.
Stop "learning" Torah piecemeal.
