🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Advocate for criminal justice reform in DC shot and killed

Stop and frisk wasn't a deterrent. It was the penalty, immediately. Stop, frisk, find a weapon. The criminal doesn't get it back. It's immediate that's why it worked.

Life in prison isn't a deterrent. The death penalty isn't a deterrent. If someone serving a life sentence somehow gets mercy and gets out, they almost immediately reoffend. The just know that this time, they won't get caught.

Stop and frisk worked because they not only took away guns from criminals, they were charged with illegally carrying a firearm in public and went to prison for it. Most of them were felons so they got hit with that charge as well. It stopped a lot of them from carrying a gun because it wasn't worth going to prison for just have a gun on them.

Look at NYC under the leadership between Rudy and DeBlazio. Night and day. The difference is one Mayor was pro law and order and the other was pro-criminal. You seen the pictures of those animals dumping buckets of water on top of police and they couldn't do a thing about it. The criminals had the upper hand and used that advantage and still are today.
 
Yep. That's how leftists want to deal with crime: lots of restrictions on getting and using a gun against a criminal. Defund, weaken their police, or both. Get leftist prosecutors DA's and judges to hand out the least penalty possible.


Then, they will fill the ranks of the cops with political stooges who protect the party over enforcing the law....
 
Stop and frisk worked because they not only took away guns from criminals, they were charged with illegally carrying a firearm in public and went to prison for it. Most of them were felons so they got hit with that charge as well. It stopped a lot of them from carrying a gun because it wasn't worth going to prison for just have a gun on them.

Look at NYC under the leadership between Rudy and DeBlazio. Night and day. The difference is one Mayor was pro law and order and the other was pro-criminal. You seen the pictures of those animals dumping buckets of water on top of police and they couldn't do a thing about it. The criminals had the upper hand and used that advantage and still are today.


And stop and frisk stopped the spur of the moment shootings when one gang banger would see another banger on the street.......they didn't carry their guns with them for fear of actually being arrested and going to prison.....and when they did have a gun, it was usually in their baby mommas purse so they wouldn't get popped for illegal gun possession...

It is funny that the anti-gun fanatics keep reducing penalties for these gun criminals and then releasing them over and over.........it makes you think they want them out on the street using illegal guns to shoot people....

You wonder why that is......hmmmmm....
 
And stop and frisk stopped the spur of the moment shootings when one gang banger would see another banger on the street.......they didn't carry their guns with them for fear of actually being arrested and going to prison.....and when they did have a gun, it was usually in their baby mommas purse so they wouldn't get popped for illegal gun possession...

It is funny that the anti-gun fanatics keep reducing penalties for these gun criminals and then releasing them over and over.........it makes you think they want them out on the street using illegal guns to shoot people....

You wonder why that is......hmmmmm....

We have a small section in a local news paper that highlights some of the crimes that take place in our neighboring suburb. They get a guy with an illegal gun, they take it away and write him a ticket. Like that would discourage anybody else from illegally carrying a gun?
 
In other news...

1669518371885.png


He, apparently, had information that could lead to Hillary Clinton's arrest.
 

Forum List

Back
Top