SwimExpert
Gold Member
- Nov 26, 2013
- 16,247
- 1,679
Bench strength? Who specifically?
O'Malley, Cuomo, Booker to name a few.
If that's your bench strength, you might want to think about switching hobbies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bench strength? Who specifically?
O'Malley, Cuomo, Booker to name a few.
Susan Rice?
Bench strength? Who specifically?
O'Malley, Cuomo, Booker to name a few.
If that's your bench strength, you might want to think about switching hobbies.
Susan Rice?
Probably will be a gubernatorial candidate if she stays in Politics. Six figure public speaker, senior counsel to Clinton II is more likely in the short-term.
Do you always sell half a pair of shoes?Nope. They'll simply point to the one or two elections they managed to win (while getting booted out of office in dozens of locales around the country) and announce that those few elections mean the Republicans are clearly a dying breed with no future.
If things don't go your way, lie about your intentions.
And if they do go your way, lie about the results of your programs.
The creed that liberals (must) live by.
So is Palin, but she can only muster half the fees Hillary can pull...Susan Rice?
Probably will be a gubernatorial candidate if she stays in Politics. Six figure public speaker, senior counsel to Clinton II is more likely in the short-term.
She's a paid liar that will never hold an elective office.
Same thing you said in 2002?Oh come on, boys, you did much better the last election. With all your predictions of suicide watchs on liberals. And all your crowing about the Romney landslide.
Now this election, the odds are for the GOP to take the Senate. That is the way the seats that are at stake fall. In 2016, the seats are exactly the opposite for the Senate, and the GOP will lose it's gains. And maybe a lot more. But, that is two years in the future, a long time in politics.
That's easy, liberals are stupid.So is Palin, but she can only muster half the fees Hillary can pull...Susan Rice?
Probably will be a gubernatorial candidate if she stays in Politics. Six figure public speaker, senior counsel to Clinton II is more likely in the short-term.
She's a paid liar that will never hold an elective office.
Susan Rice?
Probably will be a gubernatorial candidate if she stays in Politics. Six figure public speaker, senior counsel to Clinton II is more likely in the short-term.
She's a paid liar that will never hold an elective office.
Yeah, losing young voters is a start. Should've elected Hillary, your lies might still have their support. Obama has lied so much, even they can tell liberals are full of it.We should cry voter fraud like the GOP did. LOL.
If we did that though, we would be kidding ourselves. The DEMS need to do a better job in off year elections when they have the Oval office; it's that simple. Being out of power and a joke for about 8 years invigorates the opposition and you have to match that intensity or you get beat as it certainly looks like (and has looked like for 2 years now) the DEMS will in 11/14.
If there is a silver lining for the DEMS, the bench strength of the DNC seems to be growing as does their constituencies. Getting out their numbers in an off year is the trick.
said the n00b who joined the forum 13 days ago. Yeah you can have citation-free, rw/lolibertarian, kool aid-fest, debates like you people are wont to doGONE!
Then we can actually have intelligent conversations. I predicted this 2 years ago.
Must have had that retort copy and pasted...That's easy, liberals are stupid.So is Palin, but she can only muster half the fees Hillary can pull...Susan Rice?
Probably will be a gubernatorial candidate if she stays in Politics. Six figure public speaker, senior counsel to Clinton II is more likely in the short-term.
She's a paid liar that will never hold an elective office.
Not just 13 days ago for a certain sock...duplicate post
said the n00b who joined the forum 13 days ago. Yeah you can have citation-free, rw/lolibertarian, kool aid-fest, debates like you people are wont to doGONE!
Then we can actually have intelligent conversations. I predicted this 2 years ago.
Queen's English, no Gaelic...said the n00b who joined the forum 13 days ago. Yeah you can have citation-free, rw/lolibertarian, kool aid-fest, debates like you people are wont to doGONE!
Then we can actually have intelligent conversations. I predicted this 2 years ago.
Now say it in English.
What difference does it make?Must have had that retort copy and pasted...That's easy, liberals are stupid.So is Palin, but she can only muster half the fees Hillary can pull...Susan Rice?
Probably will be a gubernatorial candidate if she stays in Politics. Six figure public speaker, senior counsel to Clinton II is more likely in the short-term.
She's a paid liar that will never hold an elective office.
Whatever...pfft.
The number of women getting their BA/BS degrees are staggeringly higher than their male counterparts. This solidly dependable democrat voting block's financial strength should be hitting critical mass about the same time they are finding their strides nationally.
Bright days ahead for the Dems.
Sure it does.Whatever...pfft.
The number of women getting their BA/BS degrees are staggeringly higher than their male counterparts. This solidly dependable democrat voting block's financial strength should be hitting critical mass about the same time they are finding their strides nationally.
Bright days ahead for the Dems.
.....
None of any of that actually implies anything about political futures.
Not sexist...its the truth.So what if women are a "solidly dependable democrat voting block"? BTW, that's sexist, but I'll overlook it for now.
Few candidates if any go from zero to a "national platform". There are good Democrats who currently hold high State offices and federal ones as well. I think the better long-term DEMS are in the local levels currently but overall the future is bright. Having one of your most dependable voting blocks empowered financially only helps your outlook.So what if women are financially stable? That does not mean that your party's "rising stars" are viable candidates for upcoming national platforms.