elektra
Platinum Member
Asking for evidence is, "fake news"?I didn't have an argument with what you said.
Now to what I said.
I guess I just proved you have a low iq
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asking for evidence is, "fake news"?I didn't have an argument with what you said.
Now to what I said.
Dershowitz is en fuego in this video.
He says Fani Willis should be in the dock.
He trashes the Manhattan case.
Beginning at 20:12
Asking for evidence is, "fake news"?
I guess I just proved you have a low iq
Liars are not found in rabbit holes. I understand why you must discredit a great democrat lawyer who shows democrats broke the law in prosecuting TrumpThe facts surrounding Dershowitz have been provided many times. You know what they are. I have zero interest in running down your rabbit hole.
Dersowitz is a known lifelong DemocratDershowitz is a piece of shit!
He's a MAGA homer.
Liars are not found in rabbit holes. I understand why you must discredit a great democrat lawyer who shows democrats broke the law in prosecuting Trump
Alan Dershowitz
Bull fucking shit!Dersowitz is a known lifelong Democrat
Bull fucking shit!
I agree.It's largely irrelevant anyway. He is first a real scumbag.
Dershowitz is a known lifelong Democrat
Voted for Obama twice and voted for BidenBull fucking shit!
Nope. This was outside of a role as a defense attorney for OJ.Do you think Alan Dershowitz thought OJ was innocent? Of course not. As a defense attorney he defends, and does so brilliantly. He was a law professor for many years.
Because he's smarter than the ones who have been?If Dershowitz is so damn smart why isn't he Trumpy's lawyer?
OK. Convicted Felon and Sexual Predator TrumpThe Epstein card.
Both were democrats. Epstein did learn a lot from Bill Clinton. Remember that party Clinton through where they claimed it was Clonton's brother that gave the cocaine to the underage girl and then went to jail for it.
Trump is not convicted of anything remotely related to sex.OK. Convicted Felon and Sexual Predator Trump
Nope. He's only proven to be a sexual predator now arguing over a technicality regarding "rape"Trump is not convicted of anything remotely related to sex.
A civil court trial does not prove rape, is not used to prove rape, ever.Nope. He's only proven to be a sexual predator now arguing over a technicality regarding "rape"
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."
Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
.Nope. He's only proven to be a sexual predator now arguing over a technicality regarding "rape"
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."
Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.
Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"
Being held liable is based on a preponderance of the evidence presented.A civil court trial does not prove rape, is not used to prove rape, ever.
He stuck up for another A-hole who ended up in civil court
OJ
When other evidence came in -- we knew OJ did it. Alan was a loser a-hole defending that creep.
that is a clever way to declare you are rightBeing held liable is based on a preponderance of the evidence presented.
yawnthat is a clever way to declare you are right
Yet we have something here in America that say you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
a claim of, "I dont remember which year it happened over 30 years ago" is a very dangerous precedent. One in which the civil court had to destroy the law of, statute of limitations.