Alan Dershowitz Trashes the Lawfare Cases Against Donald Trump

[elektra]

I didn't have an argument with what you said.

Now to what I said.

Asking for evidence is, "fake news"?
I guess I just proved you have a low iq

 

[Billo_Really]

Dershowitz is en fuego in this video.

He says Fani Willis should be in the dock.

He trashes the Manhattan case.

Beginning at 20:12

Dershowitz is a piece of shit!

He's a MAGA homer.

 

[pknopp]

Asking for evidence is, "fake news"?
I guess I just proved you have a low iq

The facts surrounding Dershowitz have been provided many times. You know what they are. I have zero interest in running down your rabbit hole.

 

[elektra]

The facts surrounding Dershowitz have been provided many times. You know what they are. I have zero interest in running down your rabbit hole.

Liars are not found in rabbit holes. I understand why you must discredit a great democrat lawyer who shows democrats broke the law in prosecuting Trump

Alan Dershowitz​

 

[elektra]

Dershowitz is a piece of shit!

He's a MAGA homer.

Dersowitz is a known lifelong Democrat

 

[pknopp]

Liars are not found in rabbit holes. I understand why you must discredit a great democrat lawyer who shows democrats broke the law in prosecuting Trump

Alan Dershowitz​

And I can't understand and will never understand why you give someone like Dershowitz the time of day.

 

[Billo_Really]

Dersowitz is a known lifelong Democrat

Bull fucking shit!

 

[pknopp]

Bull fucking shit!

It's largely irrelevant anyway. He is first a real scumbag.

 

[Billo_Really]

It's largely irrelevant anyway. He is first a real scumbag.

I agree.

 

[elektra]

Dershowitz is a known lifelong Democrat

Bull fucking shit!

Voted for Obama twice and voted for Biden

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Do you think Alan Dershowitz thought OJ was innocent? Of course not. As a defense attorney he defends, and does so brilliantly. He was a law professor for many years.

Nope. This was outside of a role as a defense attorney for OJ.

Alan said OJ was being framed. He said OJ was not guilty and innocent. In the courts there is no innocent judgement, it is not guilty.

Imbecilic people like you should have to pass some sort of a test in order to post publicly.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

If Dershowitz is so damn smart why isn't he Trumpy's lawyer?

Because he's smarter than the ones who have been?

plus he doesn't want to lose his contract with FOX

LOL

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The Epstein card.

Both were democrats. Epstein did learn a lot from Bill Clinton. Remember that party Clinton through where they claimed it was Clonton's brother that gave the cocaine to the underage girl and then went to jail for it.

OK. Convicted Felon and Sexual Predator Trump

 

[elektra]

OK. Convicted Felon and Sexual Predator Trump

Trump is not convicted of anything remotely related to sex.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Trump is not convicted of anything remotely related to sex.

Nope. He's only proven to be a sexual predator now arguing over a technicality regarding "rape"

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"​

In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."

Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"

 

[elektra]

Nope. He's only proven to be a sexual predator now arguing over a technicality regarding "rape"

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"​

In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."

Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"

A civil court trial does not prove rape, is not used to prove rape, ever.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Nope. He's only proven to be a sexual predator now arguing over a technicality regarding "rape"

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"​

In a sexual assault case in May of last year, a jury found Mr. Trump had “sexually abused” E Jean Carroll. That jury found that Mr. Trump had not “raped” Ms. Carroll. Why? Because under New York state law, "rape is defined as penile penetration whereas the jury found that he had digitally penetrated her."

Yet,
In a later legal challenge, the federal judge presiding over the Carroll sexual assault case, Lewis Kaplan, concluded that the jury’s finding that she had failed to prove Trump had raped her under New York’s definition did not mean she failed to prove “rape” as many people understood it. He said the jury’s verdict had established that Trump “raped” Carroll, “albeit digitally rather than with his penis”.

Trump Lawsuit Against ABC Argues New York Penal Law "penile penetration vs digital penetration"

.

A civil court trial does not prove rape, is not used to prove rape, ever.

Being held liable is based on a preponderance of the evidence presented.

Donald Trump has been proven to be a sexual predator. You can keep denying this. But reality is what it is: Donald Trump is a sexual predator/rapist.

case closed

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

He stuck up for another A-hole who ended up in civil court

OJ



When other evidence came in -- we knew OJ did it. Alan was a loser a-hole defending that creep.

ty

 

[elektra]

Being held liable is based on a preponderance of the evidence presented.

that is a clever way to declare you are right

Yet we have something here in America that say you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

a claim of, "I dont remember which year it happened over 30 years ago" is a very dangerous precedent. One in which the civil court had to destroy the law of, statute of limitations.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

that is a clever way to declare you are right

Yet we have something here in America that say you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

a claim of, "I dont remember which year it happened over 30 years ago" is a very dangerous precedent. One in which the civil court had to destroy the law of, statute of limitations.

yawn

the jury spoke

Trump is a sexual predator