kyzr
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
1. The definition of falsifying business records in the 1st degree is NOT "court records". Publishing a Bill of Particulars with the actual crime is needed, it was not provided.![]()
Don't listen to pundits (which is what Turley is). Try reading the court documents.
Trump was not charged with an statute of limitations expired misdemeanor which would be New York Penal Code Section 175.05, he was charged with a felony well within the statute of limitations under New York State Penal Code 175.10.
Don't believe what others tell you, verify actual records to the greatest extent possible. Takes more effort but you end up incorrect less. WW
2. Turley is a LAW PROFESSOR at GW university. Dershowitz, from Harvard Law agrees with Turley.
3. (from the buzz kill Turley article, post #15)
"The indictment claimed a violation under New York’s election law 17-152 that the falsification of business records were committed to further another crime as an unlawful means to influence the election. However, in a maddeningly circular theory, that other crime could be the falsification of business records. It could also be violations of federal election and taxation laws, which Trump was never charged with, let alone convicted of. "
4. If I understand your argument you believe that Bragg and Merchan followed the Law and Trump's 34 felonies will NOT be overturned on appeal, correct? I'll take the other side and say they will, eventually. We'll need to wait and see how it plays out.