Aleppo: Would Hillary's Earpiece have saved Gary Johnson?

[HappyJoy]

Hillary wore an earpiece to get her talking points during the CinC "debate" last night.

LIAR!

Oh, come on, someone whispered in her ear to take it out when the camera panned by her on the left. Everybody knows this, just ask Alex Jones once he removes his tongue from Trump's ass.

 

[edthecynic]

Smialowski's image has been cropped to show only Clinton's face (and then blown up back to size), revealing what looks like a small light inside Clinton's ear. However, this "object" can't be seen in otherphotographs of the candidate from the same event:

Frankie and his dipshit pals could care less ... they have a brand new conspiracy to whack off to, and by damn they intend to rub the hide off the head.

bend over frankie, Clintons earpiece is in your ass ..

it ain't in her ear ...

It you adjust the grain and blur it until it disappears, yes it's not there. Unaltered photos clearly show it.

Oh, and what happened to its a "Light reflecting in her ear" excuse?

It is YOUR photo that is photoshopped!!!! It is the over-sharpening in Photoshop that adds the graininess in your photo.

 

[flacaltenn]

The question was about refugees, not about what military action we should or should not do inside Syria. That is why 'Aleppo' was in the question, Barnacle wasn't asking what we should do about the fucking town for Christ sake.

"We" don't know WHY Barnacle blurted that out. I'm sure the M. Joe crew could wring their hands and screw up their noses over it for a full segment. But DEALING with a destroyed city in Syria ain't our job.

What WAS our job was to fucking "think about Aleppo" BEFORE the death toll and destruction was all that was left. The fact that the U.N. and the G20 and every western nation took a pass on 2.5Mill civilians in a mass migration --- BEFORE they started drowning in the Med. ----- has kept ME very angry for literally YEARS now.

And NOW -- the MSNBC libs want to go beating folks about the head for paying attention to it NOW...

Not recognizing Aleppo -- before your Morning Joe -- is less serious than claiming you didn't know what the little (C) in your emails meant.

 

[HappyJoy]

The question was about refugees, not about what military action we should or should not do inside Syria. That is why 'Aleppo' was in the question, Barnacle wasn't asking what we should do about the fucking town for Christ sake.

"We" don't know WHY Barnacle blurted that out. I'm sure the M. Joe crew could wring their hands and screw up their noses over it for a full segment. But DEALING with a destroyed city in Syria ain't our job.

What WAS our job was to fucking "think about Aleppo" BEFORE the death toll and destruction was all that was left. The fact that the U.N. and the G20 and every western nation took a pass on 2.5Mill civilians in a mass migration --- BEFORE they started drowning in the Med. ----- has kept ME very angry for literally YEARS now.

And NOW -- the MSNBC libs want to go beating folks about the head for paying attention to it NOW...

Not recognizing Aleppo -- before your Morning Joe -- is less serious than claiming you didn't know what the little (C) in your emails meant.

You seemed to be upset that Gary Johnson was asked a very simple question and completely failed in his response, even when 'Aleppo' was explained to him, he didn't talk about refugees at all, he still didn't get it, just gave a canned response.

 

[amethyst]

brady had his balls checked at half time. moderators should check ears at the 1st debate.​

 

[Snouter]