One can't exist without the other.I said Mathematics and Theoretical Physics are not natural sciences. Your Wiki quote agrees.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
One can't exist without the other.I said Mathematics and Theoretical Physics are not natural sciences. Your Wiki quote agrees.
I've been talking to you about it for over 5 years.If you disagree, let's talk about the facts.
You've been talking but the facts in your arguments have been excruciatingly rareI've been talking to you about it for over 5 years.
You consider the empirical climate evidence from the geologic record to be exceedingly rare? Actually it's considerably voluminous.You've been talking but the facts in your arguments have been excruciatingly rare
The geological record is filled with information. It is a mixture of facts and theories, extrapolation, interpolations, interpretations, estimates and best guesses. Where the facts come up short is your interpretation of what it all means writh regards to to the present day situation.You consider the empirical climate evidence from the geologic record to be exceedingly rare? Actually it's considerably voluminous.
You mean like the planet transitioning from a greenhouse state to an icehouse state? Or the 30 or so glacial cycles that have occurred since it did? Or maybe the influence that plate tectonics have on landmass distributions that led to thermal isolation at each pole?The geological record is filled with information. It is a mixture of facts and theories, extrapolation, interpolations, interpretations, estimates and best guesses. Where the facts come up short is your interpretation of what it all means writh regards to to the present day situation.
None of which caused the current warming.You mean like the planet transitioning from a greenhouse state to an icehouse state? Or the 30 or so glacial cycles that have occurred since it did? Or maybe the influence that plate tectonics have on landmass distributions that led to thermal isolation at each pole?
All of which are part of the explanation for the current warming.None of which caused the current warming.
NopeAll of which are part of the explanation for the current warming.
Sure they are. Want to discuss it in the bull ring?Nope
I really don't want to discuss anything with you anywhere. I have you on ignore, but when no one else is active, you're all I've got.Sure they are. Want to discuss it in the bull ring?
That's because you know better than to debate me in the bull ring. Keep throwing rocks at your betters.I really don't want to discuss anything with you anywhere. I actually have you on ignore, but when no one else is talking, you're all I've got.
Is there something you can say in the "bull ring" that you can't say here?
You admit you've lost the argument then.I really don't want to discuss anything with you anywhere.
Ding was never in the argument.You admit you've lost the argument then.
Looks like you weren't either.Ding was never in the argument.
No theory is ever proven. It's part of the definition of the word "theory" and a constraint on all the natural sciences. This particular theory is supported by an enormous amount of evidence and is accepted as valid by an extremely large percentage of published experts in the field. That is not what is typically found in something pulled from the "lame ass" category
Staying out in the heat weeds out thickos, just like staying out in the artic cold. The average temperature in Saudi Arabia is 27c to 43c. As world temperatures and sea levels change, just like dinosaurs, they will move about. Don't forget, your sauna is warmer, but you always move to a cooler room.![]()
Opinion | The U.S. heat dome is a warning about the 2024 election
And there may be no policy area with a clearer divide between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.www.msnbc.com
No one would describe Saudi Arabia in the summer as chilly, but pilgrims at this year’s Hajj experienced something unusual even for this largely desert nation. According to the Saudi weather service, temperatures at the Grand Mosque in Mecca reached an astonishing 125 degrees Fahrenheit on Monday; 2,700 people reportedly were overcome by heat exhaustion, and dozens of pilgrims died from the temperatures.
If you have grandchildren and you want them to see a bright future, you will not vote for trump. He has vowed to roll back all environmental efforts to battle climate change. His view into the future extends no farther than the end of his orange nose. With trump is is all about power and money. He is thinking of his Saudi friends and their dependence on fossil fuel revenue.
Within five years, we may be seeing 120+ degrees temperature in the US, on a regular basis. Then the repubs will come up with another excuse to deny climate change.
Correct, and the climate based on computer models is not science, it's political science. That's why predictions come, fail, and then go, and what this global warming, to climate change, to man made climate change, to now speed of climate change keeps morphing. Political science changes more often than the wind. At least today I've learnt were not going to go extinct, we just need to figure out the dinosaur's secrets to surviving naughty weather.No theory is ever proven. It's part of the definition of the word "theory" and a constraint on all the natural sciences. This particular theory is supported by an enormous amount of evidence and is accepted as valid by an extremely large percentage of published experts in the field. That is not what is typically found in something pulled from the "lame ass" category.
Wrong. It is science using computer models. Science WITHOUT computers can be just as fucked up as science WITH them. There is nothing magically flawed in the use of computers. The automatic rejection of computer model results that the denier movement has taken as dogma is a unsupportable act of desperation.Correct, and the climate based on computer models is not science, it's political science.
Predictions like continued increases in CO2? Predictions like continued and accelerating increases in temperature? Predictions like continued and accelerating ice melt around the planet? Predictions like continued and accelerating sea level rise? Predictions like the acidification of the world's oceans? Predictions like expanding coral bleaching events? Predictions like seasonal timing effects on wildlife? Have these come, failed and gone?That's why predictions come, fail, and then go
It has NEVER morphed. The world has continued to warm. If you think the term global warming was abandoned due to a lack of warming, you need to show us the data that support that claim. Science has ALWAYS known that the problem with this change was the rate at which it was taking place. That YOU did not know that was, once again, YOUR error, not science's.and what this global warming, to climate change, to man made climate change, to now speed of climate change keeps morphing.
Do not confuse political science with politics. Political science changes no more than any other field of science.Political science changes more often than the wind.
That was your error, not that of mainstream science.At least today I've learnt were not going to go extinct
As the KT impact clearly shows, there was climate change they could not survive. However, during their span of dominance in Earth fauna, temperature changes were consistently slow.we just need to figure out the dinosaur's secrets to surviving naughty weather.