I don’t wrestle with pigsA pity you're incapable of presenting a cogent rebuttal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don’t wrestle with pigsA pity you're incapable of presenting a cogent rebuttal.
Would you like that?It’s illegal to pretend to be an elector when you aren’t.
Lynchings used to be a part of the system. Is that your next revival?
You enjoy it too much?I don’t wrestle with pigs
Questioning election results illegal in yours?Falsely affirming in a federal election is considered legal on your planet?
According to you, since it's our history it's fair game.Would you like that?
The electors were not certified by an ascertaining certifier.
How many were jailed?According to you, since it's our history it's fair game.
But that just shows how absolutely absurd your argument is. Just because we had fake electors in the 19th century doesn't mean it's okay. Those elections were incredibly corrupt. We aren't going back to the corrupt system. Just like we aren't going back to lynchings or any of the other illegal and corrupt practices from the dredges of our history.
It is what it is…Good, Bad, and the ugly….still doesn’t mean that anything illegal was done…So, am I to green from your posts in here, that you think it’s illegal to question the result of an election? Or just ones where dems are the stated winner?
Who was the 'ascertaining certifier'?
It was just part of the system back then.How many were jailed?
How long before you say voting for anyone other than democrats is illegal?Of course something illegal was done. Legitimate slates of electors must be certified by their state to be legitimate electors...
- list the names of the electors chosen by the voters and the number of votes received.
- list the names of all other candidates for elector and the number of votes received.
- be signed by the Executive and carry the seal of the State.
- contain at least one security feature, as determined by the State, for purposes of verifying the authenticity of the certificate.
These were not alternate electors, they were fake electors. Alternate electors are certified as genuine electors by their state. Fake electors are not.
So, none?It was just part of the system back then.
I don’t wrestle with pigs
It’s absolutely not our system. The system is that the states certify the electors and Congress counts them.
A bunch of political hacks pretending to be electors is not part of the system.
No one gives a shit about the super corrupt elections from the 1850s.
No idea, and also not relevant.So, none?
Questioning election results illegal in yours?
Our history is incredibly corrupt. Is that your attempt to claim precedent?
Sending uncertified electors to be counted in Congress is NOT questioning the election. It's fraud.
These losers love the bait and switch.Sending uncertified electors to be counted in Congress is NOT questioning the election. It's fraud.