Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,327
- 12,380
- 973
For the uninformed, the memo from Trump's favorite election expert.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They weren't certified. How do you not understand that?
How long before you say voting for anyone other than democrats is illegal?
Are you on drugs? I said they are fake because they weren't certified.
In Arizona, it's the Secretary of State.
So tell us how these 'fake electors' were going to be accepted by Pence and counted?
Exactly. The corrupt piece of shit that is now 'governor'. She's an expert at stealing elections.
How long before you say voting for anyone other than democrats is illegal?
Irrelevant. Maybe they would have counted them, maybe they wouldn't have, maybe they would have dismissed both.
That doesn't make them legitimate. One slate was certified by the state and one was not.
Your approval of her is not required for her to do her job. You can't even show she did anything wrong or illegal in certifying Biden electors and not Trump's.
How long before you say that voting for anyone other than Trump is not actually a vote?How long before you say voting for anyone other than democrats is illegal?
Tell us how congress counts uncertified electors?
These losers love the bait and switch.
Yeah, they introduced fraudulent electors and tried to disrupt the electoral vote counting to deprive states of their actual electoral votes.
But that's just "questioning the election".
They don't need you to, they make up their own and count them several times over in the few districts they know they can get away with it and it pushes their piece of shit over the top. It only had to be 3 or 4 swing state districts in the case of the 2020 election, not 'wide spread' at all.
It's irrelevant??? Of course it is, you need it to be in order for your slimy little accusations to make sense. Such utter and complete bullshit.
Don't both parties always have their own slate for every single election?? Why yes, they do. Nothing 'fake' about them.
Tell me, if Trump wins in AZ in November, will she certify the right ones? That's going to hurt, isn't it?
Marener posted a link to their plan...
2. When he [Pence] gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act. 3. At the end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States. That means the total number of “electors appointed” – the language of the 12th Amendment -- is 454. This reading of the 12th Amendment has also been advanced by Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe (here). A “majority of the electors appointed” would therefore be 228. There are at this point 232 votes for Trump, 222 votes for Biden. Pence then gavels President Trump as re-elected.
Pretty ironic statement from the group championing fake electors.
Both parties have their own slate in preparation of determining the winning candidate. But by the safe harbor deadline, if there is a winning candidate, only one slate, that for the winning candidate, gets certified and sent to Congress.
That you don't already know this explains a lot.
If that happens, it will hurt if she certifies Biden's electors. Wouldn't you agree?
Sure.