All Violent Felony Antifa 2017 Trump Inauguration Protest Charges Dismissed, Peaceful J6 Protester Gets 15 Years

The National Guard is very organized, so I guess that's why Trump wanted 20,000 of them at the Capitol on January 6th.
So, TRUMP! wanted 20,000 troops there to contain any violence. I'm glad you remembered that, because that alone should squash any narrative about TRUMP! "trying to overthrow the government".
 
So, TRUMP! wanted 20,000 troops there to contain any violence.
Or did he want them to go there so that he could take over the government?

Having 20,000 troops at your command certainly would be a good way to do that.
 
Real patriots who objected to the 2020 results. You expect everyone to just lay down for you and your ilk? Fuck that, fuck you, and the Democrat party you belong to.
So no link and a tantrum instead.

Sorry Trump lost in 2020.

Also, I'm not a Democrat.
 
Obviously not since they weren't even charged with that.
Shouldn’t they have been? By your logic?

They tried to interfere in government proceeding with its business. They attempted basically the same thing, just weren’t as “successful”, even though both miserably failed and neither had the ability to succeed.
 
Or did he want them to go there so that he could take over the government?

Having 20,000 troops at your command certainly would be a good way to do that.
His motive will always remain pure supposition because his request was denied. That being said, however, there is no reason to believe anything other than wanting to preserve order should violence erupt, which is the correct motorcycle.

Now if you think National Guard troops would actually obey him instead of the Constitution, you have a very low opinion of the National Guard. Basically, that's pretty wild conspiracy theory carp right there.
 
His motive will always remain pure supposition because his request was denied. That being said, however, there is no reason to believe anything other than wanting to preserve order should violence erupt, which is the correct motorcycle.

Now if you think National Guard troops would actually obey him instead of the Constitution, you have a very low opinion of the National Guard. Basically, that's pretty wild conspiracy theory carp right there.
Well, it’s certainly suspicious for a few reasons. First, 20,000 national guard is an absurd number to control a crowd. Absolutely astoundingly overkill for the size of the crowd that day. Second, we know Trump had planned to go to the Capitol that day, but would need additional security to do so.

Either way, you can see why people in Congress were concerned about having the national guard present.
 
Well, it’s certainly suspicious for a few reasons. First, 20,000 national guard is an absurd number to control a crowd. Absolutely astoundingly overkill for the size of the crowd that day. Second, we know Trump had planned to go to the Capitol that day, but would need additional security to do so.

Either way, you can see why people in Congress were concerned about having the national guard present.
Again, why do you think they would support him against the Constitution? That's a pretty wild conspiracy theory, especially knowing that he would have no control over the makeup of the troops present and I don't believe for a moment they would have fired on Congress in action. That's a really long stretch to believe that.

Let's just say it this way, if congresscritters were REALLY afraid of the troops being there, maybe they are hiding some things they don't want to come to light and SHOULD be afraid.
 
Shouldn’t they have been? By your logic?

It's not my logic. It is the courts legal system.

They tried to interfere in government proceeding with its business. They attempted basically the same thing, just weren’t as “successful”, even though both miserably failed and neither had the ability to succeed.
Who tried to interfere? Name please.
 
MSN J6 prisoner Zachary Rehl, 38, who walked through the Capitol peacefully for 20 minutes, took a selfie, and left, has been sentenced to 15 years in prison by a jury which is all from a district which voted 92% for Biden.

The treatment of Rehl by federal prosecutors differs markedly from that of transgender woman Eva Warner, who during the Portland riots of 2021 was charged with assault on police officers and other felonies, including pointing a high-powered laser into the eyes of police, which could and did result in eye injuries. A laser was found on Warner on her arrest.

Warner’s charges were dismissed after the prosecutor noted she had performed 30 hours of community service.

PJ Media reports:

Portland Police said Warner directed a high-powered laser into the eyes of law enforcement officers trying to disperse the crowd. Warner resisted arrest, prompting officers to use force, the DOJ said. A laser pointer was found on Warner.

Warner was booked into custody and charged with intentionally obstructing, impeding, interfering with law enforcement officers engaged in official duties but later released without bail.

About a week later, Warner was arrested again and charged with second-degree criminal mischief in connection with another riot. Warner was again released from custody without bail.”


Rehl’s fate also contrasts sharply to the treatment of Antifa member Tara Walker, another Portland Antifa terrorist who pleaded guilty to felonies including possession of a loaded firearm during a riot. Walker’s charges were dismissed on her day of sentencing.

On March 13, 2020 Portland Police reported:

“On Friday, March 12, 2021 at about 9:00p.m., a group began marching in the street, blocking vehicular traffic, from Jamison Park, 810 Northwest 11th Avenue. They were advised by loudspeaker that the street was open to vehicular traffic, but the crowd continued to march in the street.

At about 9:15p.m., at Northwest 15th Avenue and Northwest Overton Street, some in the crowd began breaking windows (photo). Officers moved in to address the criminal behavior. They created a perimeter around the group on Northwest Marshall Street between Northwest 13th Avenue and Northwest 14th Avenue.

The group was advised that they were being detained for investigation of crimes, they were not free to leave, and they should comply with officers’ lawful orders…Some refused to comply…

Officers discovered numerous items left behind by people inside the perimeter, including a crowbar, hammers, bear spray, slugging weapon with rocks, high impact slingshot, and knives (photos).

As the event unfolded, groups formed on the outside and physically challenged officers. Some threw rocks and full cans of beer at officers (photo). Officers deployed some OC (pepper) spray and one impact munition. Arrests were made, including two suspects carrying firearms, wearing body armor and helmets.”


Tara Walker was among those resisting arrest.

tara-walker-guns-antifa-portland-zkZ8U1-696x434.jpeg



In March of 2021 Law Enforcement Today reported that federal prosecutors had by that time quietly dismissed one third of cases, including both misdemeanor and felony charges, against downtown Portland rioters of the previous summer.

Law Enforcement Today wrote:

Antifa and Black Lives Matter protesters battled with federal agents in Portland for weeks, costing the city at least $2.3 million. The courthouse and four other federal properties were damaged, fires were set, windows were broken, and commercial-grade fireworks were used against law enforcement.

More than 113 federal officers received eye injuries because of protesters’ use of lasers during the Portland violence.

One Department of Homeland Security officer deployed to protect the courthouse in Portland described the protesters as “catatonic with hate.”


Portland Antifa also that summer set fire to a courthouse, with people inside.

Eva Warner

FHkZjSUWYAA_zJg.jpg:large

In July 2018 federal prosecutors dropped all charges against the last of more than 190 indicted, 2016, Washington DC inauguration protesters, whose goal was to reach the inauguration procession and stop the inauguration of President Trump. The protesters set numerous fires including a limo. Six police officers were injured as Antifa protesters hurled bricks and rocks.

USA Today reported on January 20, 2017:

“… limo driver Luis Villarroel of Virginia said he was dropping off passengers near the Washington Post building when he saw “hundreds of masked men” coming his way.

“They threw food at me,” he said, adding that they pounded the vehicle and then threw a flare inside the car.”


USA Today wrote:

“….protesters yelled in defiance as Trump was sworn in, with some carrying signs of support for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Within moments of the 45th president being sworn in, rain began to fall on the crowd.”

Protesters held signs saying “Trump Lost” and “Not My President.”

Below: Limo set on fire by Trump inauguration protesters, January 2017,

170120-trump-protests-rhk-01.jpg
"The protesters set numerous fires including a limo. Six police officers were injured as Antifa protesters hurled bricks and rocks." -- ????

he Committee on House Administration has opened up access to the footage more broadly, allowing reporters, certain non-profit groups, January 6 defendants, and those who were injured during the riot to view the footage.

I decided to take them up on it. Here's how it went, and what I saw.

I watched the newly-public security camera footage from January 6. I saw things I hadn't seen before — including eerie scenes of lawmakers fleeing for their safety on one​

 

great quotes:

When Democrats controlled the House, they resisted releasing the entirety of the footage, arguing that doing so would be compromising to the security of the US Capitol complex. Even so, certain clips have made their way into documentaries about that day and played a prominent role in the public hearings staged by the January 6 committee last year.


When Republicans retook the chamber, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy granted then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson exclusive access to the footage — resulting in the broadcast of a distorted narrative of the day's events that angered even fellow Republicans.

But now, the Committee on House Administration has opened up access to the footage more broadly, allowing reporters, certain non-profit groups, January 6 defendants, and those who were injured during the riot to view the footage.

I decided to take them up on it. Here's how it went, and what I saw.

 

great quotes:

When Democrats controlled the House, they resisted releasing the entirety of the footage, arguing that doing so would be compromising to the security of the US Capitol complex. Even so, certain clips have made their way into documentaries about that day and played a prominent role in the public hearings staged by the January 6 committee last year.


When Republicans retook the chamber, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy granted then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson exclusive access to the footage — resulting in the broadcast of a distorted narrative of the day's events that angered even fellow Republicans.

But now, the Committee on House Administration has opened up access to the footage more broadly, allowing reporters, certain non-profit groups, January 6 defendants, and those who were injured during the riot to view the footage.

I decided to take them up on it. Here's how it went, and what I saw.

It should have been widely available from the get-go. When you control the release of information, you control the narrative, and when you look at who controlled the release of information, you know who crafted the narrative.
 
It should have been widely available from the get-go. When you control the release of information, you control the narrative, and when you look at who controlled the release of information, you know who crafted the narrative.
The idea that everyone should see every bit of an investigation is nutty. But run with it. Oh you citizen journalists types are so amusing :rofl:
 
"If we just make up enough crazy stories, our violent fascist traitor brethren will be set free!"

Sorry, Trump cult traitors, that's not how the legal system works. Your violence fascist douche pals will keep rotting in prison, no matter how many lies you tell.

And Traitor Ashli? She's still freezing in Hell. That cheers me up every time I think about it.

By the way, can you all settle on one idiot conspiracy theory? Half of you are saying Jan 6 was staged by paid liberal actors, now you're saying they were loyal conservatives.
It was a protest that turned violent. 15 years in prison for a non violent act? Are you kidding me? Come on, Mamooth that's ridiculous and you know it! Equal justice under the law. That's what our legal system is supposed to be based on. The Merrick Garland DOJ is a disgrace.
 
It was a protest that turned violent. 15 years in prison for a non violent act? Are you kidding me? Come on, Mamooth that's ridiculous and you know it! Equal justice under the law. That's what our legal system is supposed to be based on. The Merrick Garland DOJ is a disgrace.
Fact: Proud Boys, 3%ers, Oath Keepers went there to riot. - proven in court of law.

They did not go there to peacefully protest. And many who followed their lead regret it, but they were not all 'non-violent' and that also was proven in a court of law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top