Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,901
- 1,530
The workers would not be doing anything if no one was there telling them what to doNot reallyAmerican CEOs claim to be rare. But they are no more rare than CEOs in international corporations. Yet, they are paid significantly higher.Neither do workers, probably even less so.
People have value, and nobody is going to pay somebody of little value a lot of money. They have to have value in some capacity. Conversely, nobody is going to overpay a worker either in most cases. CEO's, especially the best ones, are very rare; just as rare as that star quarterback, ace pitcher, beautiful and talented actress, or the great song writer. Because they are rare, they can make higher demands for compensation, because if you don't want to meet those demands, somebody else just might, and then those people get the talent.
In other words, take your job for instance. What if only you and a handful of people had the ability to do your job? What kind of money would you make? Well.....as long as you could produce profit for a company, you might be able to ask for millions a year, and companies would have no choice but to take it.
Over the last three decades, American CEOs have seen significant increases in their compensation. Yet, American companies have not done significantly better
![]()
So what does employees pay have to do with what a CEO makes? It's totally irrelevant.
It relates to the distribution of company profit.
The workers used to get a larger slice of the pie. The amount of profit that goes to workers has decreased, while the amount going to executive compensation has increased
After enough time, corporations realized it was not a successful plan. Paying workers more money does not equal greater profit. Paying a CEO more money does.
Not necessarily.
It is the workers who are creating wealth.
CEOs move money around giving the illusion of wealth and profit while adding nothing of value
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk