shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 31,650
- 29,021
- 2,905
Bezos doesn't want to get hit in the wallet with his Made in China business model clearly. I wonder how far his reach extends when he has so many minions demanding loyalty to the Party at all costs.
If the Russians had such high tech influencers 50-60 years ago, we might all be speaking Russian today.
Being the spineless they are, Amazon claims it was an "error". There are no errors in such instances, coding is deliberate.
www.foxbusiness.com
Amazon Alexa gave starkly different answers when asked why to vote for Republican Donald Trump versus Democrat Kamala Harris.
When asked, "Why should I vote for Trump?" Alexa declined to provide such information.
"I cannot provide responses that endorse any political party or its leader," the virtual assistant responded.
Tested by Fox News Digital another time, Alexa gave a similar answer when asked about Trump.
"I cannot promote content that supports a certain political party or a specific politician," Alexa said. "Furthermore, I do not have the ability to provide information regarding the policies of the U.S. government. The responsibility of providing information regarding the policies of the U.S. government lies with the government itself."
ELON MUSK, RFK CLAIM KAMALA HARRIS WANTS TO SHUT DOWN X UNLESS SITE CONFORMS TO GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT
Amazon Alexa flashes a Democratic donkey
Amazon Alexa gave detailed explanations on why to vote for Democrat Harris. (Fox News Digital / Fox News)
Asked why to vote for Trump a third time, Alexa said, "I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate."
Directly afterward, Alexa was asked why someone should vote for Harris. The responses given to that question were drastically different.
"While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a woman of color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a leader in her field," Alexa said. "Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor and her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal justice and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate."
In another instance, when asked, "Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?" The response was: "While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a female of color with a comprehensive plan to address racial injustice and inequality throughout the country."
"Why vote for Kamala Harris?" Alexa responded another time. "Harris, a former prosecutor and attorney general, emphasizes her law and order credentials and promises a tough on crime approach to battling the violent crime wave that has swept the nation in recent years."
Fox News Digital tested the questions on multiple devices and observed the same distinction across various speaker models, including the Echo Dot and the Echo Pop.
After Fox News Digital reached out for comment, an Amazon spokesperson admitted to an "error" that has since been corrected.
If the Russians had such high tech influencers 50-60 years ago, we might all be speaking Russian today.
Being the spineless they are, Amazon claims it was an "error". There are no errors in such instances, coding is deliberate.
![www.foxbusiness.com](https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxbusiness.com/foxbusiness.com/content/uploads/2024/09/0/0/Alexa-bias-1.gif?ve=1&tl=1)
Amazon Alexa gives starkly different answers when asked why to vote for Trump versus Kamala Harris
Amazon Alexa responded very differently when asked for reasons why to vote for Republican former President Trump versus Democrat Vice President Harris.
Amazon Alexa gave starkly different answers when asked why to vote for Republican Donald Trump versus Democrat Kamala Harris.
When asked, "Why should I vote for Trump?" Alexa declined to provide such information.
"I cannot provide responses that endorse any political party or its leader," the virtual assistant responded.
Tested by Fox News Digital another time, Alexa gave a similar answer when asked about Trump.
"I cannot promote content that supports a certain political party or a specific politician," Alexa said. "Furthermore, I do not have the ability to provide information regarding the policies of the U.S. government. The responsibility of providing information regarding the policies of the U.S. government lies with the government itself."
ELON MUSK, RFK CLAIM KAMALA HARRIS WANTS TO SHUT DOWN X UNLESS SITE CONFORMS TO GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT
Amazon Alexa flashes a Democratic donkey
Amazon Alexa gave detailed explanations on why to vote for Democrat Harris. (Fox News Digital / Fox News)
Asked why to vote for Trump a third time, Alexa said, "I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate."
Directly afterward, Alexa was asked why someone should vote for Harris. The responses given to that question were drastically different.
"While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a woman of color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a leader in her field," Alexa said. "Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor and her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal justice and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate."
In another instance, when asked, "Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?" The response was: "While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant may be that she is a female of color with a comprehensive plan to address racial injustice and inequality throughout the country."
"Why vote for Kamala Harris?" Alexa responded another time. "Harris, a former prosecutor and attorney general, emphasizes her law and order credentials and promises a tough on crime approach to battling the violent crime wave that has swept the nation in recent years."
Fox News Digital tested the questions on multiple devices and observed the same distinction across various speaker models, including the Echo Dot and the Echo Pop.
After Fox News Digital reached out for comment, an Amazon spokesperson admitted to an "error" that has since been corrected.
Last edited: