Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no do you and bodey need one? I am fine with people having faith, even when I dont. And you call chirstans intolerant.See, another attack on christians, Dr. Quack is not fooling anyone. Go tell your christian gay friends how thier religion is bs.You mean, like your opinion about what is and is not a christian church.Thanks for your opinion
That Bible you quoted earlier calls what you do an abomination...think about it
It also says that wearing a cotton/polyester blend is an abomination.
How is paraphrasing the Old testament an "attack" on Christians?
I didn't realize you were so sensative. Do you need a hug?
Oh...that made it SO MUCH BETTER when the Church Hierarchy hide them and moved them around for decades. Because there was a lower percentage of them...................................................wonderful.There you are, trying to "think" again. You keep on defending the Catholic Hierarchy and their long-term protection of pedophile priests.I think Bodey went to Catholic school and the Nuns damaged her. I have watched her go after catholics with angry foaming fever.
The percentage of pedophile priests in the Church is lower than in the general population
Still waiting on proof that I defend pedophiles? Or were you just lying ....again.Ah...here you are:And you'd be wise to learn about the 14th Amendment and its case law before trying to discriminate against gay Americans.And shell fish is a major no no....and divorce gives you a one-way ticket to damnation.It also says that wearing a cotton/polyester blend is an abomination.
Once again, Mosaic Law, part of the Old Covenant and replaced by the New Covenant. You'd be wise to hone up on the Bible before trying to use it against a Christian
The 14th mentions homos? Where?
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Gay Americans are citizens. Gay Americans are subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Gay Americans cannot be denied the equal protection of the laws.
The fool is getting massacredDr.Quack thinks he is an expert on every thing, haven't you noticed?I used an absurd example to show that your interpretation of the decision ("People can now freely exempt themselves from laws they deem violate their religious convictions. Solid case.") was absurd.
It isn't. You can call it absurd all you want to, but having a general sense of how the law actually works, I can tell you for a fact that this ruling will impact federal law regarding discrimination against homosexuals. Trust me, I know.
The law specifically impacted will be this one:
42 U.S.C. 2000a
(a) Equal access
All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
It can be gleaned here that people can and will file for an exemption based on this law, because such compliance would violate their religious beliefs, they will cite the Burwell v Hobby Lobby case as precedent.
Filing an "exemption" is not the same as receiving one.
And please don't try to act like an expert on the law. I know you're not a lawyer, you're no more an expert on how the law works than any of us are.
You don't need to be a lawyer to know about the law. But you seem to think you are an expert on Supreme Court rulings, so please, be my guest and show me why the scope of this SCOTUS ruling will only be limited to contraception?
Moreover, simply filing an exemption will, in the process of consideration, allow the proprietor to continue his or her desired practice unless granted a reprieve or denied and ordered to comply with the law. Simple.
So...what about lesbians....are we your gods' chosen then?Romans Chapter 1It also says that wearing a cotton/polyester blend is an abomination.
Old Covenant, it was done away with by the New Covenant and it was also Mosaic Law which only applied
to Jews, you've been crushed and your Biblical knowledge is laughable
The verses calling homosexuality an "abomination" are also Mosaic law.
Except that homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament. Keep trying old fool
Quote?
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Wont admit that pedophile priests are GAY, if you are a male and you molest a boy , you are a HOMOSEXUALOh...that made it SO MUCH BETTER when the Church Hierarchy hide them and moved them around for decades. Because there was a lower percentage of them...................................................wonderful.There you are, trying to "think" again. You keep on defending the Catholic Hierarchy and their long-term protection of pedophile priests.I think Bodey went to Catholic school and the Nuns damaged her. I have watched her go after catholics with angry foaming fever.
The percentage of pedophile priests in the Church is lower than in the general population
You defend the Hierarchy by your constant condemnation of posters like myself who point out what they did for decades. I have YET to hear you state that what the Hierarchy did was wrong. But you haven't hesitated to get on my case for pointing out what they did to children.Still waiting on proof that I defend pedophiles? Or were you just lying ....again.Ah...here you are:And you'd be wise to learn about the 14th Amendment and its case law before trying to discriminate against gay Americans.And shell fish is a major no no....and divorce gives you a one-way ticket to damnation.
Once again, Mosaic Law, part of the Old Covenant and replaced by the New Covenant. You'd be wise to hone up on the Bible before trying to use it against a Christian
The 14th mentions homos? Where?
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Gay Americans are citizens. Gay Americans are subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Gay Americans cannot be denied the equal protection of the laws.
There you are, trying to "think" again. You keep on defending the Catholic Hierarchy and their long-term protection of pedophile priests.I think Bodey went to Catholic school and the Nuns damaged her. I have watched her go after catholics with angry foaming fever.
The percentage of pedophile priests in the Church is lower than in the general population
You and the baker are both ignorant of the law.I think one baker can disagree.To be fair I don't hear fags bitching about christians or their lifestyles. Can't say the same thing from the opposite perspectiveChristians need to get a grip. Fagots are here to stay, get used to it.
Christians are here to stay, too. Gay people must get used to that fact as well.
Oh...so no girls were molested? Or don't they count?Wont admit that pedophile priests are GAY, if you are a male and you molest a boy , you are a HOMOSEXUALOh...that made it SO MUCH BETTER when the Church Hierarchy hide them and moved them around for decades. Because there was a lower percentage of them...................................................wonderful.There you are, trying to "think" again. You keep on defending the Catholic Hierarchy and their long-term protection of pedophile priests.I think Bodey went to Catholic school and the Nuns damaged her. I have watched her go after catholics with angry foaming fever.
The percentage of pedophile priests in the Church is lower than in the general population
So...what about lesbians....are we your gods' chosen then?Romans Chapter 1Old Covenant, it was done away with by the New Covenant and it was also Mosaic Law which only applied
to Jews, you've been crushed and your Biblical knowledge is laughable
The verses calling homosexuality an "abomination" are also Mosaic law.
Except that homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament. Keep trying old fool
Quote?
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
There isnt a non christian who takes your church seriously. Honestly Catholics don't take any other denominations seriously. Born again too. You're all stupid. Oh and don't forget Mormons. Who takes them serious? Oh yea you voted for one.Why do homos and the homo's supporters keep squawking about Westboro? There isn't a true Christian alive that takes that "church" serious
Wont admit that pedophile priests are GAY, if you are a male and you molest a boy , you are a HOMOSEXUALOh...that made it SO MUCH BETTER when the Church Hierarchy hide them and moved them around for decades. Because there was a lower percentage of them...................................................wonderful.There you are, trying to "think" again. You keep on defending the Catholic Hierarchy and their long-term protection of pedophile priests.I think Bodey went to Catholic school and the Nuns damaged her. I have watched her go after catholics with angry foaming fever.
The percentage of pedophile priests in the Church is lower than in the general population
And hateful bigotry is hateful bigotry. Is it a sacrament in your faith?So...what about lesbians....are we your gods' chosen then?Romans Chapter 1The verses calling homosexuality an "abomination" are also Mosaic law.
Except that homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament. Keep trying old fool
Quote?
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Queer is queer
of course it is wrong, it is also wrong for you to say that I defend homosexual gay priest pedophiles, when I dont. Still waiting on that link? I have never defended the church' s actions on gay pedophile preists, you need to link to that as well. STOP LYINGYou defend the Hierarchy by your constant condemnation of posters like myself who point out what they did for decades. I have YET to hear you state that what the Hierarchy did was wrong. But you haven't hesitated to get on my case for pointing out what they did to children.Still waiting on proof that I defend pedophiles? Or were you just lying ....again.Ah...here you are:And you'd be wise to learn about the 14th Amendment and its case law before trying to discriminate against gay Americans.Once again, Mosaic Law, part of the Old Covenant and replaced by the New Covenant. You'd be wise to hone up on the Bible before trying to use it against a Christian
The 14th mentions homos? Where?
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Gay Americans are citizens. Gay Americans are subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Gay Americans cannot be denied the equal protection of the laws.
Romans Chapter 1It also says that wearing a cotton/polyester blend is an abomination.
Old Covenant, it was done away with by the New Covenant and it was also Mosaic Law which only applied
to Jews, you've been crushed and your Biblical knowledge is laughable
The verses calling homosexuality an "abomination" are also Mosaic law.
Except that homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament. Keep trying old fool
Quote?
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
The fool is getting massacredDr.Quack thinks he is an expert on every thing, haven't you noticed?I used an absurd example to show that your interpretation of the decision ("People can now freely exempt themselves from laws they deem violate their religious convictions. Solid case.") was absurd.
It isn't. You can call it absurd all you want to, but having a general sense of how the law actually works, I can tell you for a fact that this ruling will impact federal law regarding discrimination against homosexuals. Trust me, I know.
The law specifically impacted will be this one:
42 U.S.C. 2000a
(a) Equal access
All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
It can be gleaned here that people can and will file for an exemption based on this law, because such compliance would violate their religious beliefs, they will cite the Burwell v Hobby Lobby case as precedent.
Filing an "exemption" is not the same as receiving one.
And please don't try to act like an expert on the law. I know you're not a lawyer, you're no more an expert on how the law works than any of us are.
You don't need to be a lawyer to know about the law. But you seem to think you are an expert on Supreme Court rulings, so please, be my guest and show me why the scope of this SCOTUS ruling will only be limited to contraception?
Moreover, simply filing an exemption will, in the process of consideration, allow the proprietor to continue his or her desired practice unless granted a reprieve or denied and ordered to comply with the law. Simple.
Obviously they do, but that hasnt stopped gay pedophiles from becoming preists has it.Wont admit that pedophile priests are GAY, if you are a male and you molest a boy , you are a HOMOSEXUALOh...that made it SO MUCH BETTER when the Church Hierarchy hide them and moved them around for decades. Because there was a lower percentage of them...................................................wonderful.There you are, trying to "think" again. You keep on defending the Catholic Hierarchy and their long-term protection of pedophile priests.I think Bodey went to Catholic school and the Nuns damaged her. I have watched her go after catholics with angry foaming fever.
The percentage of pedophile priests in the Church is lower than in the general population
So the Catholic Church has a problem with allowing gay men to become priests? Interesting.
of course it is wrong, it is also wrong for you to say that I defend homosexual gay priest prdophiles, when I dont. Still waiting on that link? I have never defended the church' s actions on gay pedophile preists, you need to link to that as well. STOP LYINGYou defend the Hierarchy by your constant condemnation of posters like myself who point out what they did for decades. I have YET to hear you state that what the Hierarchy did was wrong. But you haven't hesitated to get on my case for pointing out what they did to children.Still waiting on proof that I defend pedophiles? Or were you just lying ....again.Ah...here you are:And you'd be wise to learn about the 14th Amendment and its case law before trying to discriminate against gay Americans.
The 14th mentions homos? Where?
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Gay Americans are citizens. Gay Americans are subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Gay Americans cannot be denied the equal protection of the laws.
no do you and bodey need one? I am fine with people having faith, even when I dont. And you call chirstans intolerant.See, another attack on christians, Dr. Quack is not fooling anyone. Go tell your christian gay friends how thier religion is bs.You mean, like your opinion about what is and is not a christian church.
That Bible you quoted earlier calls what you do an abomination...think about it
It also says that wearing a cotton/polyester blend is an abomination.
How is paraphrasing the Old testament an "attack" on Christians?
I didn't realize you were so sensative. Do you need a hug?
