An example of how much we don't know regarding this Planet...

[ClosedCaption]

I posted the link to over 20 different organizations all agreeing with GW.

Lets compare that to the link given by Takeastep that said only .3% agreed but failed to mention how he came up with that number.

One guy blog against all the different science societies and organizations.

You're right, Nothing with prove it to you because you don't want to believe it. Science, Scientists, research etc don't matter when you simply go with "your gut"

 

[mal]

The Union of Concerned Scientists is a public policy advocacy group, not a scientific outfit. You fuckin' wanker.

Honesty doesn't matter to Liberals.



peace...

 

[ClosedCaption]

The Union of Concerned Scientists is a public policy advocacy group, not a scientific outfit. You fuckin' wanker.

Why do you lie? From their site and Now tell me why this is NOT a science group. You have a habit of saying things aren't what they are without explanation

The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.

What began as a collaboration between students and faculty members at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1969 is now an alliance of more than 400,000 citizens and scientists. UCS members are people from all walks of life: parents and businesspeople, biologists and physicists, teachers and students. Our members understand that scientific analysis—not political calculations or corporate hype—should guide our efforts to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

Our experts work on some of the world's most complex and daunting problems: stemming the tide of global warming, finding sustainable ways to feed, power and transport ourselves, and reducing the threat of catastrophic war. Our achievements over the decades show that thoughtful action based on the best available science can help safeguard our future and the future of our planet.

How are they not a science outfit?

 

[ClosedCaption]

2012 AMS Information Statement on Climate Change

This statement provides a brief overview of how and why global climate has changed over the past century and will continue to change in the future. It is based on the peer-reviewed scientific literature and is consistent with the vast weight of current scientific understanding as expressed in assessments and reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Although the statement has been drafted in the context of concerns in the United States, the underlying issues are inherently global in nature.

These guys wrong too?

 

[ClosedCaption]

How about these guys...Wrong also?

American Physical Society: Statement on Climate Change

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (November 2007)

Everyones wrong except you. Curiously you are right all the time by simple proclaiming to be so.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

I've already shown that the Union of Concerned Scientists is nothing more than a public policy advocacy group. They aren't scientists adn do not practice science. Regardless of the outlandish claims they make about their outfit.

 

[Dot Com]

mal in the politics sub-forum? Has the world turned upside down?

As to the OP, we're experiencing the "tipping point" right now. Grab your ankles Rightists/deniers.

http://news.yahoo.com/greenhouse-gas-volumes-reached-high-2012-wmo-103517684.html

 

[TakeAStepBack]

How about these guys...Wrong also?

American Physical Society: Statement on Climate Change

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (November 2007)

Everyones wrong except you. Curiously you are right all the time by simple proclaiming to be so.

Jeebus. Since Novemeber of 2007, the IPCC has been forced to acknowledge no warming beyond the margin of error for over 12 years. Thes slogan sayings from societies whos members are in line with a national geographic subscription have no scientific bearing. None.

There is no consesnsus on AGW within the peer reviewed scientific community. You can roll out as many of those membership fee society proclamations all you want. it means nothing in real science. Nothing,.

 

[Old Rocks]

How about these guys...Wrong also?

American Physical Society: Statement on Climate Change

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (November 2007)

Everyones wrong except you. Curiously you are right all the time by simple proclaiming to be so.

Jeebus. Since Novemeber of 2007, the IPCC has been forced to acknowledge no warming beyond the margin of error for over 12 years. Thes slogan sayings from societies whos members are in line with a national geographic subscription have no scientific bearing. None.

There is no consesnsus on AGW within the peer reviewed scientific community. You can roll out as many of those membership fee society proclamations all you want. it means nothing in real science. Nothing,.

LOL. Stated without links or backup of any kind. Well, I am off to the University, more math and science classes, and a lab. Guess what, many of the scientists that I meet there on a every other day basis are actually doing research on this very subject, and writing peer reviewed articles.

You want respect on this subject, don't make stupid statements that you cannot back up.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Math 95 and Science for beginners will love to have you, Rocks. Bring your #2.

 

[ClosedCaption]

http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/mtg_200702/aaas_climate_statement.pdf

All these scientists agree but they all don't know what they are talking about. How weird is that?

And they all know less than the guy with the blog Sparky linked to that had no evidence and no peer reviewed information.

LOL

 

[TakeAStepBack]

The sources can be found all over.

IPCC Railroad engineer Pachauri acknowledges ?No warming for 17 years? | Watts Up With That?

Guest post by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley (one of the authors of the peer reviewed paper that crushed that fucking LOLberal nonsense about 97.3% consensus from the consensus project)

Following my statement at the Doha climate conference last December that there had been no global warming for 16 years, Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, the railroad engineer who for some reason chairs the IPCC’s climate “science” panel, has been compelled to admit there has been no global warming for 17 years.

The Hadley Centre/CRU records show no warming for 18 years (v.3) or 19 years (v.4), and the RSS satellite dataset shows no warming for 23 years (h/t to Werner Brozek for determining these values).


Engineer Pachauri said warming would have to endure for “30 to 40 years at least” to break the long-term global warming trend. However, the world’s leading climate modelers wrote in the NOAA’s State of the Climate report in 2008 that 15 years or more without warming would indicate a discrepancy between the models and measured reality.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/mtg_200702/aaas_climate_statement.pdf

All these scientists agree but they all don't know what they are talking about. How weird is that?

And they all know less than the guy with the blog Sparky linked to that had no evidence and no peer reviewed information.

LOL

Yay. Nine board of directors! Woohoo!

 

[ClosedCaption]

The Importance of Science in Addressing Climate Change: Scientists? letter to the U.S. Congress | Climate Science Watch

“The assertions of climate deniers should not be given scientific weight equal to the comprehensive, peer-reviewed research presented by the vast majority of climate scientists. … Congress should, we believe, hold hearings to understand climate science and what it says about the likely costs and benefits of action and inaction. It should not hold hearings to attempt to intimidate scientists or to substitute ideological judgments for scientific ones.”

I'm putting each one in a different post. Lets see Takeastep click each one and tell everyone why everyone is wrong and he alone is correct

 

[ClosedCaption]

The sources can be found all over.

IPCC Railroad engineer Pachauri acknowledges ?No warming for 17 years? | Watts Up With That?

Wait, you're taking the word of a Railroad engineer on Climate Science.

Was the shoe shine guy busy?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

mal in the politics sub-forum? Has the world turned upside down?

As to the OP, we're experiencing the "tipping point" right now. Grab your ankles Rightists/deniers.

Greenhouse gas volumes reached new high in 2012 - WMO

And yet no temperature increases! Amazing. it's like CO2 drives temperature. Execpt when it doesn't. Then the ocean ate the waqrming. At least for now. until we come up with a new explanation for our failed psuedo-science.