However, the main concern that many of you true believers seem to have, is not the science of global warming, but the heretics who refuse to believe. Then, a reasonable person has to ask why are they so upset that people don't believe? What is behind their need for people to believe? We aren't dealing with a religion here, or are we?
This really is a hileraious post.
You don't want to labeled a heretic, and yet you have no problem in labeling me a 'true believer'.
And you wonder why people get frustrated?
I get frustatrated by people needing to slap a childish and insulting label on anyone and everyone who disagrees with them.
Here's an idea - stop using insulting labels and maybe you won't be labeled in return?
I have no problem with being labeled a heretic. When it comes to the religion of global warming, that is what I am.
A true believer is someone who accepts a concept as true, and has a problem with those who do not have the same view. That pretty well seems to define your defense of the science of global warming. Your feigned indignation over being referred to as a true believer has to be nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to being outed.
However, your response is non responsive to the gist of my remarks. Why are you true believers so upset that many of us refuse to accept the science of global warming?
Could it be that you are more interested in the politics of global warming, and are afraid that the skeptics are derailing your goals?