Ill begin by saying the US should not get involved in Syrias civil war no matter which side used sarin gas.
Nevertheless, to satisfy my own curiosity Ive been trying to determine which entity in Syria launched the sarin gas attack. The answer could be Assad, the Syrian Free Army, or both. If the answer is both it follows that the rebels had to make it look like Assad did it.
I can only base my conclusions on what is reported in the media. Mendacity and media bias notwithstanding, I can only analyze the info the government via the media feeds me. I certainly will not take anything they say at face value.
Based on everything Ive heard and read to date, I tend to believe the chemical attack was launched by the Free Syrian Army. Barack Taqiyya & Company offer nothing that proves otherwise; no satellite photos showing vapor trails from delivery missiles in flight; no proof of any kind that Assad or his thugs launched the attack. The only proof the administration offers consists of horror stories, videos of corpses accompanied by emotional manipulation, scare tactics, and a moral obligation to engage in war when America is not threatened.
Parenthetically, the West should have learned by now that Arab Muslims will not convert to Christianity because of phoney humanitarian concerns. Americas foreign policy in the Middle East should be based on one rationale in for a penny in for a pound. If the Middle East is such bloody stink hole then the whole damned Arabian Peninsula should be leveled. The longer the West avoids the truth the stronger fanatics in the Middle East become. As for the only thing of value on the Arabian Peninsula petroleum either take it by force, or walk away and to hell with the moral garbage.
Heres one possibility I considered in the real world.
The UNs report is due next Monday. In the unlikely event the UN surprises the world and proves conclusively that the Syrian Free Army launched the attack does John Kerrys moral obligation call for bombing the rebels? No matter. I would not believe Kerry any more than Putin believes him:
Frankly, I think Putin despises Kerry for betraying his own country after he returned from Vietnam. The Administrations bungling of the civil war in Syria gave Putin a chance to publicly tell Kerry exactly what he thinks of him.
Aint it a bitch when an unrepentant Communist like Putin turns out to be morally superior to Americas secretary of state! And who knows what is in old KGB files. Im referring to information the North Vietnamese might have shared with the Soviets surrounding Kerrys activities in Paris in 1971:
Not only is Kerry a liar he cites liars to make his case for bombing Syria:
At this point in time the details in this article acquit Assad:
Of course, there is a possibility that Assad ran off a batch of the kitchen variety sarin gas then used it just to fool the world.
On the other side of the issue Walid Shoebat makes a case against the rebels supported by the administration. Whether or not a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood is credible is for you to decide. Always conscious of double agents, I cannot see how Shoebat, or the Muslim Brotherhood, benefits from the following article and videos:
Finally, experts say it will take eight to ten years to round up all of the chemical weapons in Assads stockpile; dismantle them, and dispose of them. I have a suggestion. If Putin and Assad are serious send in as many troops as it takes to gather up the weapons; load them on an old ship, then sink the vessel in the deepest part of the Marianas Trench. Regardless of how it is accomplished none of it should be done by United Nations hustlers.
I know that environmental freakazoids will object but screw them.
Nevertheless, to satisfy my own curiosity Ive been trying to determine which entity in Syria launched the sarin gas attack. The answer could be Assad, the Syrian Free Army, or both. If the answer is both it follows that the rebels had to make it look like Assad did it.
I can only base my conclusions on what is reported in the media. Mendacity and media bias notwithstanding, I can only analyze the info the government via the media feeds me. I certainly will not take anything they say at face value.
Based on everything Ive heard and read to date, I tend to believe the chemical attack was launched by the Free Syrian Army. Barack Taqiyya & Company offer nothing that proves otherwise; no satellite photos showing vapor trails from delivery missiles in flight; no proof of any kind that Assad or his thugs launched the attack. The only proof the administration offers consists of horror stories, videos of corpses accompanied by emotional manipulation, scare tactics, and a moral obligation to engage in war when America is not threatened.
Parenthetically, the West should have learned by now that Arab Muslims will not convert to Christianity because of phoney humanitarian concerns. Americas foreign policy in the Middle East should be based on one rationale in for a penny in for a pound. If the Middle East is such bloody stink hole then the whole damned Arabian Peninsula should be leveled. The longer the West avoids the truth the stronger fanatics in the Middle East become. As for the only thing of value on the Arabian Peninsula petroleum either take it by force, or walk away and to hell with the moral garbage.
Heres one possibility I considered in the real world.
The UNs report is due next Monday. In the unlikely event the UN surprises the world and proves conclusively that the Syrian Free Army launched the attack does John Kerrys moral obligation call for bombing the rebels? No matter. I would not believe Kerry any more than Putin believes him:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps2ssj8v3mo&feature=player_embedded"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps2ssj8v3mo&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
Frankly, I think Putin despises Kerry for betraying his own country after he returned from Vietnam. The Administrations bungling of the civil war in Syria gave Putin a chance to publicly tell Kerry exactly what he thinks of him.
Aint it a bitch when an unrepentant Communist like Putin turns out to be morally superior to Americas secretary of state! And who knows what is in old KGB files. Im referring to information the North Vietnamese might have shared with the Soviets surrounding Kerrys activities in Paris in 1971:
Not only is Kerry a liar he cites liars to make his case for bombing Syria:
At this point in time the details in this article acquit Assad:
Of course, there is a possibility that Assad ran off a batch of the kitchen variety sarin gas then used it just to fool the world.
On the other side of the issue Walid Shoebat makes a case against the rebels supported by the administration. Whether or not a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood is credible is for you to decide. Always conscious of double agents, I cannot see how Shoebat, or the Muslim Brotherhood, benefits from the following article and videos:
Finally, experts say it will take eight to ten years to round up all of the chemical weapons in Assads stockpile; dismantle them, and dispose of them. I have a suggestion. If Putin and Assad are serious send in as many troops as it takes to gather up the weapons; load them on an old ship, then sink the vessel in the deepest part of the Marianas Trench. Regardless of how it is accomplished none of it should be done by United Nations hustlers.
I know that environmental freakazoids will object but screw them.
Last edited:
