gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 67,251
- 35,823
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #41
Agreed. If the government followed the Constitution to a T, then we would have limited government. We don't.I think if our govt was as small as it WAS SUPPOSED TO BE we probably wouldnt even be complaining about it.Defined: a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.
I know the statists don't think it possible or workable. However, a stateless society is conceivable and far better than the state run society we have today.
Nothing has caused more death, suffering, and destruction than the state throughout human history. So, logically, why continue something so heinous?
There is NOTHING to fear from a stateless society. There is much to fear from a state run society.
...okay...now you can call me CRAZY!
PS. Anarchy is not synonymous with chaos.
I have always felt like SOMEONE would try to take control. Most humans REQUIRE someone to tell them what to do. That could cause ALOT of problems.
I dont wish for anarchy. I dont wish for bloated govt. I wish for our country to be run the way it was supposed to be.
Madison assumed that the Constitution with its checks and balances, would prevent government abuses. Today we have a central government that has coalesced into one big tyranny, designed to prey on the people...there are no checks and balances.