Semantics. The end result is the same, he rejects God's existence and will be rejected by God.That definition is miles off. An atheist does not deny God's existence. An atheist is convinced there is no God to deny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Semantics. The end result is the same, he rejects God's existence and will be rejected by God.That definition is miles off. An atheist does not deny God's existence. An atheist is convinced there is no God to deny.
I am saying plucking one verse from the Bible to make a point is pointless. Too much is left out.It's far more than one verse, and you are not a Bible scholar if you pretend it is. You're trying to ignore that passage by pretending it's only "one verse". Don't do that.
Not another verse from you! Jesus is not addressing atheists; he is addressing those who used him for their own ends. Jesus never did have much patience for hypocrites.I'm not, Jesus is:
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
Even those who have impressive lists of things they did in God's name, even miracles, will be denied by Christ if He does not know them. I'm not saying it, Jesus is. Do you deny Him?
Rather, those who know God and reject him can go their own way.Semantics. The end result is the same, he rejects God's existence and will be rejected by God.
And I didn't do that. I posted that verse IN CONTEXT, and cited the place where it came from. It's not the only place that Scripture says that, either. Will you please deal with the passage I cited?I am saying plucking one verse from the Bible to make a point is pointless. Too much is left out.
He is clearly addressing those who think they have done so many things for God that He will accept them on their merits and have not bothered to actually have a relationship with Him.Not another verse from you! Jesus is not addressing atheists; he is addressing those who used him for their own ends. Jesus never did have much patience for hypocrites.
You will not spend eternity in God's presence if you deny His existence.Rather, those who know God and reject him can go their own way.
You don't understand what I am saying. Lifting ANY verse out of the whole of the Bible is out of context. I already dealt with it.And I didn't do that. I posted that verse IN CONTEXT, and cited the place where it came from. It's not the only place that Scripture says that, either. Will you please deal with the passage I cited?
He is clearly addressing those who think they have done so many things for God that He will accept them on their merits and have not bothered to actually have a relationship with Him.
Let's not limit the limitless--i.e., the love and mercy of God.You will not spend eternity in God's presence if you deny His existence.
Do an old man a favor and point out where you did, because I don't want you to repeat yourself unnecessarily. I would like to hear what you think of that PASSAGE, note I did not say one verse. How do you deal with Romans 4 that clearly indicates God values faith so highly that He credits it for righteousness, even though people are not working for it?You don't understand what I am saying. Lifting ANY verse out of the whole of the Bible is out of context. I already dealt with it.
Let us also not ignore God's justice, which is every bit as deep and limitless as His love and mercy. Answer me this, do you believe that God forgives unrepented sin? Do you believe He will accept into eternity with Him those who reject Him their entire lives?Let's not limit the limitless--i.e., the love and mercy of God.
Post #173Do an old man a favor and point out where you did, because I don't want you to repeat yourself unnecessarily. I would like to hear what you think of that PASSAGE, note I did not say one verse. How do you deal with Romans 4 that clearly indicates God values faith so highly that He credits it for righteousness, even though people are not working for it?
I replied to that one but did not see anything that dealt directly with what the writer of Romans was talking about, namely that even those who do not work, but have faith have that faith credited to them for righteousness.Post #173
The question to address is that a man of faith with no works is credited with righteousness. However, a righteous man with no faith, has zero credit?I replied to that one but did not see anything that dealt directly with what the writer of Romans was talking about, namely that even those who do not work, but have faith have that faith credited to them for righteousness.
The question to address is that a man of faith with no works is credited with righteousness. However, a righteous man with no faith, has zero credit?
Earlier in Romans Paul speaks of God judging a man's deeds; that those following the Law will be judged under the Law; that those not under the Law will have their deeds judged under their God-given conscience.
Consider non-belief as one deed a man chooses. This very well may count against him when all his deeds are judged. We believe God is just. For that reason the deed of non-belief, in all that is just, would not knock out all other good works a person lived by under their God-given conscience.
That is what we read, yes.The question to address is that a man of faith with no works is credited with righteousness.
Is a man righteous who has no faith? Scripture says that without faith it is impossible to please God. IOW, how can he be considered righteous without faith? He does good things, great. Does he do them for the glory of God or for his own selfish purposes?However, a righteous man with no faith, has zero credit?
And those in Christ are judged by neither, because of Him. That is the Gospel. Those who try to be justified by following the Law will also be judged BY the Law and found wanting. Again, that's where faith comes in, because none of us can be "good enough" on our own. We have to trust that God not only exists but wants us to live with Him forever. The bottom line remains, good deeds do not wipe out or cancel sin.Earlier in Romans Paul speaks of God judging a man's deeds; that those following the Law will be judged under the Law; that those not under the Law will have their deeds judged under their God-given conscience.
Non-belief is deadly, because how can God forgive sin when a person is not penitent because they refuse to believe? And don't tell me I'm limiting God, I'm just going by what He has to say on the subject of sin. I'm sure I'll be surprised both by who is in heaven and who is not.Consider non-belief as one deed a man chooses. This very well may count against him when all his deeds are judged. We believe God is just. For that reason the deed of non-belief, in all that is just, would not knock out all other good works a person lived by under their God-given conscience.
It's fascinating that the etymology of heretic/heresy is to choose. Students were given issues to study and were then encouraged to choose. The usage became more negative when the choice differed from orthodox Christianity.
Points to ponder is that Jesus commanded we spread the Good News. He asked us to love as he loves. He taught God is love. Somehow, telling anyone they won't be forgiven for anything, their goodness will be looked on as filth, falls well short of teaching the love of God and his Good News.Non-belief is deadly, because how can God forgive sin when a person is not penitent because they refuse to believe? And don't tell me I'm limiting God, I'm just going by what He has to say on the subject of sin. I'm sure I'll be surprised both by who is in heaven and who is not.
Presenting a different perspective is not waxing superior to Catholic beliefs.So much for what you believe. A lot of Protestants wax superior in the fake knowledge that their beliefs are better than... totally superior to, those of the Catholics..
I apologize for posting something incoherent.This is the most incoherent comment you have posted so far! First you bring up etymology as you often do and then you are
all over the place!
When fellow posters can't tell what the main point is, it's a fail.
In any case, we'd like to know what you have to say about the OP