Who isn't?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
And now, the TRUTH: Archer's actual testimony--Hunter may have sold sizzle, but no steak.
- Thread starter Rumpole
- Start date
Who isn't?
Why because I stated a fact?You just keep piling on with your antisemitism. It’s delicious. Yum yum yum
As of 2023, the world's "core" Jewish population (those identifying as Jews above all else) was estimated at 16 million, 0.2% of the 8 billion worldwide population.
Most normal people. LOLWho isn't?
Just admit you’re an antisemite. It’s OK
And you want to make it 16mil less. We get it, SealyNaziWhy because I stated a fact?
As of 2023, the world's "core" Jewish population (those identifying as Jews above all else) was estimated at 16 million, 0.2% of the 8 billion worldwide population.
Here's the thing about Jews. They think everyone is anti semetic.Most normal people. LOL
Just admit you’re an antisemite. It’s OK
I'll prove it. What percent of the world population would you say is anti semetic? More or less than 50%?
16 million, 0.2% of the 8 billion worldwide population.
Do you think 4 billion of us are anti semetic give or take a billion? I bet you do.
I do believe Israel had a lot to do with helping Bush lie us into Iraq. How many Americans died in Iraq? Are you anti American?And you want to make it 16mil less. We get it, SealyNazi
No. But you definitely are.Here's the thing about Jews. They think everyone is anti semetic.
I'll prove it. What percent of the world population would you say is anti semetic? More or less than 50%?
16 million, 0.2% of the 8 billion worldwide population.
Do you think 4 billion of us are anti semetic give or take a billion? I bet you do.
And you have proof of this? It wasn’t Cheney and his Haliburton investment? Nah…Israel is an enemy of Iran why would they want Irans biggest enemy weakened?I do believe Israel had a lot to do with helping Bush lie us into Iraq. How many Americans died in Iraq? Are you anti American?
BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Irony is DumpHole employing the term “truth” about his own empty contentions.
What percent of us do you think are anti semetic? 25%?No. But you definitely are.
And you have proof of this? It wasn’t Cheney and his Haliburton investment? Nah…Israel is an enemy of Iran why would they want Irans biggest enemy weakened?
Why would a Democratic Senator from Connecticut who ran as Gore's running mate in 2000 become so chummy with George Bush? And such a strong vocal supporter of the Iraq war?
Lieberman was a supporter of the Iraq War and has urged action against Iran. In July 2008, Lieberman spoke at the annual conference of Christians United for Israel (CUFI) then later, in July 2009, accepted from John Hagee CUFI's "Defender of Israel Award".[77] Pastor Hagee, CUFI's founder and leader, has made a number of controversial remarks, including a statement that the Catholic Church is "the great whore" and a suggestion that God allowed the Holocaust to happen to bring the Jews to Israel.
In April 2010, Lieberman blasted President Obama for stripping terms like "Islamic extremism" from a key national security document, calling the move dishonest, wrong-headed and disrespectful to the majority of Muslims who are not terrorists.
I think Joe was working for citizens of Israel not Connecticut.
Lieberman was one of the Senate's strongest advocates for the war in Iraq.
Joe Lieberman - Wikipedia
20%What percent of us do you think are anti semetic? 25%?
You'd be surprised. Hey, do you know that the right wing Christians in America defend Israel but for their own weird reasons? Are you familiar with this? You probably know more about this than I do.
Half of evangelicals support Israel because they believe it is important for fulfilling end-times prophecy
And although Jews know it's crazy talk, they don't care because why argue with defending Israel? No matter what the reason.
This is interesting
Polls taken in 2021 and 2022 show a significant gap between Republicans and Democrats in their levels of support for Israel and for the Palestinians.
“Republicans and those who lean to the GOP are much more likely to express a favorable view of the Israeli people (78%) than of the Palestinian people (37%). Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, on the other hand, similar shares express favorable views toward both groups (60% and 64%, respectively).”
Yet 70% of American Jews are Democrats. Go figure.
Wouldn't you say that 22% of Republicans and 40% of Democrats to be anti semetic?
That's a lot of Americans. Is that more or less than 20% I'm bad at math. 332 Americans. That's 36 million and 66 million is let's just say 20% is 110 million. That's 33% you would actually say are anti semetic because they don't totally side with Israel 100% of the time on everything.
What does this have to do with you being an antisemite?You'd be surprised. Hey, do you know that the right wing Christians in America defend Israel but for their own weird reasons? Are you familiar with this? You probably know more about this than I do.
Half of evangelicals support Israel because they believe it is important for fulfilling end-times prophecy
And although Jews know it's crazy talk, they don't care because why argue with defending Israel? No matter what the reason.
This is interesting
Polls taken in 2021 and 2022 show a significant gap between Republicans and Democrats in their levels of support for Israel and for the Palestinians.
“Republicans and those who lean to the GOP are much more likely to express a favorable view of the Israeli people (78%) than of the Palestinian people (37%). Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, on the other hand, similar shares express favorable views toward both groups (60% and 64%, respectively).”
Yet 70% of American Jews are Democrats. Go figure.
Wouldn't you say that 22% of Republicans and 40% of Democrats to be anti semetic?
That's a lot of Americans. Is that more or less than 20% I'm bad at math. 332 Americans. That's 36 million and 66 million is let's just say 20% is 110 million. That's 33% you would actually say are anti semetic because they don't totally side with Israel 100% of the time on everything.
I said if anyone disagrees with Israel's position on anything once, or if a person argues with a Jewish American about anything relating to Israel or Jewish people, they are immidately anti semetic. I just showed you 33% of America is anti semetic. You guessed 20%. Just pulled it out of your ass. My number is at least based on something other than a hunch.What does this have to do with you being an antisemite?
Nope. You called Jared “Jew Boy”. Zero to do with Israel. We are talking about YOU.I said if anyone disagrees with Israel's position on anything once, or if a person argues with a Jewish American about anything relating to Israel or Jewish people, they are immidately anti semetic. I just showed you 33% of America is anti semetic. You guessed 20%. Just pulled it out of your ass. My number is at least based on something other than a hunch.
You are an antisemite. And your number was 50%
and WAPO is as reliable a source as the Enquirer.I said if anyone disagrees with Israel's position on anything once, or if a person argues with a Jewish American about anything relating to Israel or Jewish people, they are immidately anti semetic. I just showed you 33% of America is anti semetic. You guessed 20%. Just pulled it out of your ass. My number is at least based on something other than a hunch.
themirrorthief
Diamond Member
old man, you are trying way to hard....the genie is out of the bottle the buydim family is corrupt as al caponeWe now have the transcripts of Archer's testimony, here.
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Devon-Archer-Transcript.pdf
Starting on page 102 of the Hearing involving Devon Archer's testimony: Lines staring
with the letter A, (for Answer) are Archer's testimony/answers to questions which are the heart of what this hearing is all about, whether or not any real access was 'sold', or whether or not foreign policy was affected by Hunter's presence on the board of Burisma, or whether or not Joe Biden benefited, financially, from Hunter Biden's presence on the Board, or whether or not Archer was aware of any wrongdoing by Joe Biden, etc.
On the issue of the 'Joe calling in on speakerphone" on page 41, Archer states:
I think you have to understand that there was no business conversation about a cap table or a fee or anything like that. It was, you know, just general niceties and, you know, conversation in general, you know, about the geography, about the weather, whatever it may be.
I'm sorry to report to you Republicans, but, although it is clear that Hunter leveraged his dad's 'Brand', he did it entirely independently of his father, and the calls from Joe did not prove Joe involved himself in his son's deals, it seems clear to me that this is Hunter just showing off to his associates who is father is, and the spectacle of having the Vice President of the United States 'call in'.
In short, Hunter sold sizzle, but no steak.
Is that illegal? he can allude to steak, i.e.,, the 'illusion of access' as it was referred to in another thread, but I don't think that is illegal. And if it is, I don't care because there is NOTHING on Joe here that proves any wrongdoing.
Hunter is a private citizen, and that's the end of it..
The worst you got on Hunter is a FARA violation. But FARA violations are not proof of corruption, it's a process crime.
Transcript, starting on page 102, noting that Biden's getting Ukraine to fire Shokin, that issue was dealt with, towards the end of this OP,
Q At the conclusion of that investigation, Senate minority staff issued a report summarizing the findings. And I'd like to read those for you.
"Every witness interviewed for this investigation testified that Vice President Biden did not alter United States foreign policy to benefit his son Hunter Biden, and that Hunter Biden's presence on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma had no effect on U.S. foreign policy. Every witness stated that Hunter Biden and his associates had no role in the formulation of U.S. policy, that Hunter Biden's role did not influence U.S. foreign policy decisions, and that Vice President Biden carried out U.S. foreign policy in the interest of the United States. The investigation's evidence, set forth in this Minority report, confirms there was no corruption, wrongdoing, or impropriety on the part of" the Vice President."
Having read that for you, I have a few questions for you based on your own knowledge and experience. So based on your own knowledge and experience -- your relationship with Hunter Biden, your time on Burisma's board, and the entirety of your knowledge and experience -- do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that, quote, "Vice President Biden did not alter U.S. foreign policy to benefit his son Hunter Biden"?
A I have no basis to know if he altered. I have no basis to know if he altered policy to benefit his son.
Q So you have no knowledge --
A I have no knowledge. Sorry.
Q -- of him --
A Yes, I have no knowledge.
Q -- altering U.S. policy to benefit his son.
A I have no knowledge.
Q You -- do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that "Hunter Biden's presence on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma had no effect on U.S. foreign policy"?
A Not directly. You mean like making laws? I don't -- I don't think so.
Mr. Goldman. Foreign policy.
Mr. Archer. No -- no -- no on foreign policy.
Q No basis to disagree with that conclusion.
A No.
Q Do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that "Hunter Biden's role did not influence U.S. foreign policy decisions"?
A I have -- yeah, I have no basis.
Q Do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that "Vice President Biden carried out U.S. foreign policy in the interest of the United States"?
A I have no basis to judge.
Q Or to disagree with that.
A Or disagree.
Q You have no knowledge -- nothing based on your knowledge or experience contradicts this conclusion.
A No.
Q Does anything in your knowledge or experience contradict the conclusion that "there was no corruption, wrongdoing, or impropriety on the part of Vice President Biden"?
A I have no basis to know.
Q The report also found, quote, "No --"
Mr. Goldman. I'm sorry. You have no basis to know or is that a no?
Mr. Archer. I have -- I have -- I would have no idea.
Mr. Goldman. No basis --
Mr. Schwartz. Are you aware of any wrongdoing by Vice President Biden?
Mr. Archer. No, I'm not aware of any.
Q So based on your knowledge and experience, you have no evidence that would contradict any of these conclusions I just read.
A No.
Q The report also found, quote, "No evidence that any action of the U.S. Government or any U.S. official was taken to benefit Burisma or Hunter Biden." Do you have any evidence or knowledge that contradicts this conclusion?
A No.
Q So based on everything you saw, heard, and observed, did you have any knowledge of Joe Biden having any involvement with Burisma?
A No -- not direct, no.
Q No involvement of Joe --
A No.
And on the issue of Biden getting Ukraine to fire Shokin:
Q And so this goes to this idea that Shokin, who was prosecutor general in 24 2015, was good for Burisma.
A Uh-huh.
Q Is that fair? Now, Vice President Biden was vocal about his concerns about corruption in the prosecutor general's office in Ukraine during this time period.
A Correct.
Q And called for the removal of Shokin from office. Is that correct?
A Yes. That was very well publicized.
Q Okay. And the Senate minority report, which I referenced earlier, described how Vice President's public calls for the Ukrainian Government to remove Shokin as prosecutor general was part of an anticorruption policy of the U.S. Government with broad bipartisan support, as well as support from allies and international institutions like the EU and the International Monetary Fund. Do you agree with that conclusion?
A Sorry. Can you repeat that?
Q Yeah. The Vice President's public calls for the removal of Shokin was part of this broad bipartisan, international anticorruption effort in Ukraine.
A Yes, I believe that was -- that was part of the conversation.
Q so do you have any basis to believe that Vice President Biden's call for
Shokin's removal was driven by anything other than the U.S. Government's anticorruption
policy in Ukraine?
A Yeah, I have no -- I have no other -- I have no proof or thought that he fired him for that reason.
Q You have no reason to believe otherwise?
A I have no reason to believe.
Sorry, there simply is no wrongdoing evidenced in this testimony regarding our president, Joe Biden. I look forward to Hunter's testimony. I'm confident it will be similar, and all you Republicans, for all the accusations, 'Biden Crime Family" Bribed Joe this, Bribed Joe that, all of you will have a tank load of EGG on your faces.
In truth, what is really going on here is a massive witch hunt in order to thwart attention away from Trump's indictments, and he will have a total of 4, no doubt, very soon. I can't help that your guy is a real criminal and ours is not, perhaps you should vote for a decent human being instead of a crook.
That's on you.
Proves you're brainwashed.and WAPO is as reliable a source as the Enquirer.
You say that as your boy is on his 4th case. LOL. Did you hear Trump's lawyer hacked into voting machines the day after his insurrection?old man, you are trying way to hard....the genie is out of the bottle the buydim family is corrupt as al capone
I've known about this since it happened. How come you don't know about this? You need to watch the trial.
Georgia Election Indictment Highlights Wider Attempts To Illegally Access Voting Equipment
The new indictment in Georgia includes charges against several people accused of illegally accessing voting equipment in one rural county.
Your boy is busted.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 125
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 116
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 115
- Replies
- 34
- Views
- 665
- Replies
- 54
- Views
- 710
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 17
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8513
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-