Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly. Why wouldn't you pick the warmest pre-industrialization temperature?So you pick a cold period to compare modern temps with; cool!!! Dishonest but cool.
Greg
I like how Crick believes that CO2 saved the planet from further cooling.I'm still amazed at how CO2 can cause either fires or floods.
Were it not for man-made global warming we would be getting colder, not hotter.
There must be some context missing, right?I like how Crick believes that CO2 saved the planet from further cooling.
Nope. He was trying to defend the IPCC's benchmark temperature for measuring incremental warming which was bench-marked to a cold period.There must be some context missing, right?
Nope. He was trying to defend the IPCC's benchmark temperature for measuring incremental warming which was bench-marked to a cold period.
He walked right into it.
Do not try to put words in my mouth asshole.I like how Crick believes that CO2 saved the planet from further cooling.
Do not try to put words in my mouth asshole.
Were it not for man-made global warming we would be getting colder, not hotter.
I am constantly amazed at your stupidity. Increasing temperatures means that more water is evaporated, and when that water vapor rains out, there is more of it. So it rains where it normally rains, but a lot more rain. And the increase in heat in the atmosphere means normally dry areas are even drier as the snow packs come later and leave sooner, and more water is evaporated out of the soil. Of course, believing in a hollow moon with reptilians or grays makes a lot more sense to you. LOLI'm still amazed at how CO2 can cause either fires or floods.
Now that is the ultimate in dumb fuckery. As a specie, we have only been here for 200,000 to 300,000 years, and have had an industrial civilization for less than 300 years. But in that time with have increased the CO2 level from 280 ppm to 410+ ppm. and the CH4 from about 600-700 ppb to over 1450 ppb. By the Milankovitch Cycles, we should be in a slow cooling period leading to another ice age. And were for the 6000 year period prior to about 1700.You mortals think in terms of 100's of years. The earth has been turning for over a Billion years. When the dinosaurs roamed, the climate was 10 degrees higher, and they complained it was too cold.
Instead of punishing yourself, get used to it. This cycle will be hot, the next rain and then snow again.
Make Preparations.
I am constantly amazed at your stupidity. Increasing temperatures means that more water is evaporated, and when that water vapor rains out, there is more of it. So it rains where it normally rains, but a lot more rain. And the increase in heat in the atmosphere means normally dry areas are even drier as the snow packs come later and leave sooner, and more water is evaporated out of the soil. Of course, believing in a hollow moon with reptilians or grays makes a lot more sense to you. LOL
It must be a flaw in the ignorant that they see themselves and their own behaviors in others who'd never think of such things. I don't really care whether or not you believe what you say Frank. That you continue to say it is your 'crime'.I realize that neither you nor mamooth actually believe a word of what you say.
It must be a flaw in the ignorant that they see themselves and their own behaviors in others who'd never think of such things. I don't really care whether or not you believe what you say Frank. That you continue to say it is your 'crime'.
Damn, you are such an ignorant ass. Ice age, 180 ppm, interglacial, 280 ppm, 100 ppm of CO2 difference. Now we have increased the CO2 content by 130 ppm. And the temperatures are rising rapidly.Here's a few things you cannot refute:
- You've never posted a single experiment demonstrating that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM raises temperature. Can you post it now?
- The Mauna Loa CO2 readings show the global economic shutdown has had NO EFFECT of global CO2 output, meaning mankind has no measurable effect on CO2
Well he did credit CO2 for saving the planet from colder temperatures.I realize that neither you nor mamooth actually believe a word of what you say.
Prior to the industrial revolution CO2 tracked temperature. In other words, CO2 was a proxy for temperature. It didn't drive temperature. This is the fundamental error in the logic of people who have concluded CO2 drives climate. It doesn't. It's a minor greenhouse gas.Damn, you are such an ignorant ass. Ice age, 180 ppm, interglacial, 280 ppm, 100 ppm of CO2 difference. Now we have increased the CO2 content by 130 ppm. And the temperatures are rising rapidly.
Damn, you are such an ignorant ass. Ice age, 180 ppm, interglacial, 280 ppm, 100 ppm of CO2 difference. Now we have increased the CO2 content by 130 ppm. And the temperatures are rising rapidly.
Now that is the ultimate in dumb fuckery. As a specie, we have only been here for 200,000 to 300,000 years, and have had an industrial civilization for less than 300 years. But in that time with have increased the CO2 level from 280 ppm to 410+ ppm. and the CH4 from about 600-700 ppb to over 1450 ppb. By the Milankovitch Cycles, we should be in a slow cooling period leading to another ice age. And were for the 6000 year period prior to about 1700.
