justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 24,284
- 16,335
- 1,405
- Thread starter
- #41
I'm not going to argue that....lol..... Above and beyond all other things there is usually a reason why a person is back again and again.... Often we will find that they work extremely hard at getting reelected... If it showcases nothing else it showcases the fact that hard work usually bears some type of good result. As object lessons go you could certainly do worse.I would argue that these people get re-elected is that the represent the districts. Water's district was poor when she got there and it'll still be poor long after she leaves.
Taking the Lipinskis as an example, for 38 years, father and son represented a district that was largely white, catholic, working class people, mostly Polish from Chicago's South West Side. Socially conservative and fiscally liberal. Old Man Lipinski was praised as the mythical "Reagan Democrat".
Then as demographics shifted, the third district became more and more a suburban district. (That little section on the Northwest was what was left of the Chicago part of the district.
View attachment 548075
Yes, the Chicago Machine helped Danny out through most of his career, but at the end of the day, he really didn't represent the district. Especially with his views on Abortion. (He was one of the last anti-Abortion Democrats).
But looking at his list, most of the things on his list are geared towards changing elections. Not really a policy.
The biggest problem with politicians is they give us exactly what we want. We want government to do all this stuff and we don't want to pay for it.
Jo