francoHFW
Diamond Member
op- Total BS, for ignorant dupes only....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You'll note that they always, ALWAYS, fail to mention the other reasons given for going into Iraq.The rest of the world laughs at us?
You mean like the time we invaded Iraq looking for WMDs?
We and 48 other countries in a coalition invaded Iraq, so what part of the world that matters was laughing?
I guess we should report the copyright violation, but who care what that vile bitch says anyways.
You'll note that they always, ALWAYS, fail to mention the other reasons given for going into Iraq.The rest of the world laughs at us?
You mean like the time we invaded Iraq looking for WMDs?
We and 48 other countries in a coalition invaded Iraq, so what part of the world that matters was laughing?
Many of which are now being used by them to support their president's desire to hurl "the lightening bolt" at an evil-doer!
The only connection between this and Iraq is W's total BS that turned the Labour party against this. Great job, Georgie.
Syria intervention plan fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern
Massacres of civilians are being exploited for narrow geopolitical competition to control Mideast oil, gas pipelines
COMMUNITY ORGANIZER GOES TO WAR
September 4, 2013
Oh, how I long for the days when liberals wailed that "the rest of the world" hated America, rather than now, when the rest of the world laughs at us.
With the vast majority of Americans opposing a strike against Syria, President Obama has requested that Congress vote on his powers as commander in chief under the Constitution. The president doesn't need congressional approval to shoot a few missiles into Syria, nor -- amazingly -- has he said he'll abide by such a vote, anyway.
COPYRIGHT 2013 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
Edited by Moderator.
Full articles of copyrighted material are not allowed. Post a snip and a link.
Nice me, I'm providing the link this time. Community Organizer Goes to War - Ann Coulter - Page 1
It was an edit of your post. Violation of Copyright Law.COMMUNITY ORGANIZER GOES TO WAR
September 4, 2013
Oh, how I long for the days when liberals wailed that "the rest of the world" hated America, rather than now, when the rest of the world laughs at us.
With the vast majority of Americans opposing a strike against Syria, President Obama has requested that Congress vote on his powers as commander in chief under the Constitution. The president doesn't need congressional approval to shoot a few missiles into Syria, nor -- amazingly -- has he said he'll abide by such a vote, anyway.
COPYRIGHT 2013 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
Edited by Moderator.
Full articles of copyrighted material are not allowed. Post a snip and a link.
Nice me, I'm providing the link this time. Community Organizer Goes to War - Ann Coulter - Page 1
I feel so bad about the infraction. I will pray the rosary five times before I sleep...so God might forgive me should I die tonight. Mea culpa,mea culpa,mea maxima culpa.....
That would be the same Ann Coulter who said in 2006 we should invade Iran and China, yes?
Hypocritical bitch.
The truth sticks in your craw, doesn't it.
Not at all. Her hypocrisy only makes her worshippers' butts hurt, not mine.
It is long past time to kick the crazy bitch to the curb. When you grow up some day, you will see this. Too late.
Reading through the OP, one realizes quickly that all she is really doing doing is trying to build up some sort of rationale as to why she can oppose this action after having been such a zealous supporter of the Iraq disaster,
without looking like a two-faced Obama deranged hack.
She fails.
Reading through the OP, one realizes quickly that all she is really doing doing is trying to build up some sort of rationale as to why she can oppose this action after having been such a zealous supporter of the Iraq disaster,
without looking like a two-faced Obama deranged hack.
She fails.
and yet you see know problem with libs who opposed iraq now supporting the same thing in syria. how hypocritical of you
You'll note that they always, ALWAYS, fail to mention the other reasons given for going into Iraq.The rest of the world laughs at us?
You mean like the time we invaded Iraq looking for WMDs?
We and 48 other countries in a coalition invaded Iraq, so what part of the world that matters was laughing?
Many of which are now being used by them to support their president's desire to hurl "the lightening bolt" at an evil-doer!
You'll note that they always, ALWAYS, fail to mention the other reasons given for going into Iraq.We and 48 other countries in a coalition invaded Iraq, so what part of the world that matters was laughing?
Many of which are now being used by them to support their president's desire to hurl "the lightening bolt" at an evil-doer!
If Kerry's case for military action against Syria is essentially the same case that was made against Iraq,
why is military action against Syria getting virtually NO support from all the USMB'ers who supported, and still defend, the war against Iraq?
The only connection between this and Iraq is W's total BS that turned the Labour party against this. Great job, Georgie.
Don't forget oil.
Syria intervention plan fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern
Massacres of civilians are being exploited for narrow geopolitical competition to control Mideast oil, gas pipelines
Syria intervention plans fuelled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concerns | Nafeez Ahmed | Environment | theguardian.com
Reading through the OP, one realizes quickly that all she is really doing doing is trying to build up some sort of rationale as to why she can oppose this action after having been such a zealous supporter of the Iraq disaster,
without looking like a two-faced Obama deranged hack.
She fails.
and yet you see know problem with libs who opposed iraq now supporting the same thing in syria. how hypocritical of you
And what is your evidence that I have no problem with that?
and yet you see know problem with libs who opposed iraq now supporting the same thing in syria. how hypocritical of you
And what is your evidence that I have no problem with that?
will you vote republican in the next elections or continue to blindly follow the party line