Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you imagine the howls of indignation from Trumpleton's if something Chelsea said caused contradictory language on a website to be scrubbed?
And that the comment was outrageously stupid and inaccurate. Made to cover up for her mom's incompetence.
For example, this.....................Stories are forgotten because many of you cry wolf CONSTANTLY and the general public has become immune to your endless scandals.
You waste your time trying to get anything but more lies and half truths from these vermin.more than one of these outrages is a violation of the law, that comes with criminal penalties. Jared, Ivanka, and the pile of orange vomit better damn well hope they don't lose in November.
What laws are those?
Please be specific...
No one is saying they should. But the federal government should have taken charge of procurement and dispersal of supplies in short supply to ensure states with the greatest need get as much as they can.They aren’t there to provide everything for them.
After Kushner says 'it's our stockpile,' HHS website changed to echo his comments on federal crisis role
![]()
After Kushner says 'it's our stockpile,' HHS website changed to echo his comments on federal crisis role
"We're a backup," President Donald Trump said Thursday. "We're not an ordering clerk."abcnews.go.com
But the national stockpile actually is intended for states' use, which was clearly explained on the government's own website -- until the language was changed, without explanation, hours after Kushner provided his inaccurate description.
Until Friday morning, the website of the Department of Health and Human Services, which maintains the stockpile, read, "When state, local, tribal, and territorial responders request federal assistance to support their response efforts, the stockpile ensures that the right medicines and supplies get to those who need them most during an emergency."
But midday Friday, hours after Kushner directly contradicted the language on the HHS website, the text was changed without explanation. Retroactively matching what Kushner said, the website no longer says states can rely on the stockpile, but now says it exists to “supplement” them.
..............................................................................................................
WTF? THEY CHANGED THE LANGUAGE ON THE WEBSITE!!!!!!!!!
Did they think people wouldn't notice???????
This is what nepotism looks like. A comment made by Big Fat Don's moronic son-in-law that was so stupid they changed the language on the HHS website to try to cover it up.
If this had happened during a Clinton presidency right wing nuts would be talking about it for months. But with this admin it will get lost in the shuffle of all the other deceitful, incompetent things they do every day.
Did you get to the part where it says FAILED TO TAKE ACTION??
Have we found those hundreds of children that the Federal government lost a couple years ago? ...
Nope. Then they would have to face realityThey are included in the link I provided. Don't you ever read the information supplied to you?
This isn't tRivia Suez, people live and die on the decisions made by these worthless fucktards.Another day another Trump bashing thread over trivia.
Yeah everyone blew it ACCEPT the leader of the free world who's FIRST duty is to protect Americans?Did you get to the part where it says FAILED TO TAKE ACTION??
Are you talking about Cuomo.
If so, I agree.
Deblazio really blew it.
The world has 840,000 active cases.
130,000 of those are in the New York City/Newark area.
Why is it the Gub'mit's job at all?
Where are all the 'free marketers' that used to post here?????
~S~
Yeah everyone blew it EXCEPT the leader of the free world who's FIRST duty is to protect Americans?
The Trump administration received its first formal notification of the outbreak of the coronavirus in China on Jan. 3. Within days, U.S. spy agencies were signaling the seriousness of the threat to Trump by including a warning about the coronavirus — the first of many — in the President’s Daily Brief.Believe this gramps
April 1, 2020, 11:01 AM EDT
By Steve Benen
The New York Times reported overnight on a September 2019 study prepared by White House economists that warned of devastating public-health and economic consequences of a pandemic, but the report "went unheeded inside the administration."
[The 2019 study specifically urged] Americans not to conflate the risks of a typical flu and a pandemic. The existence of that warning undermines administration officials' contentions in recent weeks that no one could have seen the virus damaging the economy as it has. The study was requested by the National Security Council, according to two people familiar with the matter.
If it seems like there have been a lot of reports along these lines, it's not your imagination.
On March 16, Politico reported last week on a presentation prepared for Team Trump during the presidential transition process, which warned the incoming Republican administration about how the U.S. federal government would have to respond to a deadly viral outbreak. It didn't appear to have much of an effect.
On March 19, the New York Times reported on government exercises, including one conducted just last year, warning officials that the country was ill-prepared for a pandemic. As the article explained, an unreleased HHS report described a likely outcome that sounds awfully familiar: "Federal agencies jockeyed over who was in charge. State officials and hospitals struggled to figure out what kind of equipment was stockpiled or available. Cities and states went their own ways on school closings."
On March 20, the Washington Post reported, "U.S. intelligence agencies were issuing ominous, classified warnings in January and February about the global danger posed by the coronavirus while President Trump and lawmakers played down the threat and failed to take action that might have slowed the spread of the pathogen." The Post spoke to one U.S. official who reportedly had access to intelligence reporting and who told the newspaper, "Donald Trump may not have been expecting this, but a lot of other people in the government were -- they just couldn't get him to do anything about it. The system was blinking red."